throw310822

3 ms·

1.
by throw310822 6d ago
In fact, every nipple on the internet is not real, but just a flat, realistic picture.
2.
by throw310822 6d ago
And yet, "I'm tired of x" is one of the tropes of the last few years. I'm tired of people communicating they're tired. No, actually, I'm annoyed. I know, that's meta. But still.
3.
by throw310822 8d ago
Seems exactly on the same side to me- Netanyahu was the one that pushed most for the US invasion of Iraq: "Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel [...] also visited Washington in late 2002 to lobby for the invasion of Iraq. Apparently r
4.
by throw310822 8d ago
Does that mean that humans could produce mathematical proofs that are entirely logical and verifiable by other humans, but that cannot be formalised in any automatically verifiable language such as lean?
5.
by throw310822 9d ago
More trivially, map and filter are operations that can be understood by what they do to individual elements, while reduce is a folding operation that is applied recursively on its own output. Much harder to think about.
6.
by throw310822 9d ago
The antisemitic Claude puts the total US grants (= gifts) to Israel in the past 5 years to $33 billion, which my antisemitic calculator puts at $6.6 billion/ year. Of course these gifts allow Israel to fund its own healthcare while it
7.
by throw310822 9d ago
Well if that consoles you, the US government has just approved gifting mega-bombs to Israel for another $2.8 billion. Several news call it a "sale" but it's actually a gift since most of the money comes from the US government
8.
by throw310822 10d ago
If you go this route, the amount of things you just don't know is innumerable. Maybe to be conscious it's necessary to be wet and squishy. To like chocolate. To have a name starting with "c". "We just don't kno
9.
by throw310822 10d ago
> We cannot test for that which we cannot define. That's not the point. You know exactly how to define being conscious and aware- it's your subjective experiencing of the world and of your inner states. The problem is that bein
10.
by throw310822 10d ago
This has nothing to do with the statement above- it's just a consequence of the fact that by resetting the context you reset all memory of the llm. The same would happen if you could reset entirely a human brain to some initial state-
11.
by throw310822 12d ago
> These remarks are antisemitic So it would be fine if they were against any other country engaged in genocide, but not against Israel because it's Jewish? Is that your defense of Israel? > We want to live like ordinary people in
12.
by throw310822 12d ago
Nobody gives a damn about the freedom of the Iranian people. They are a problem for Israel [1], so the US bombs them. The rest is just post-hoc justification. [1] Note that every civilised country should be a problem for Israel- but Iran is
13.
by throw310822 14d ago
> You stated that the submission did not represent the facts because the facts are about banning «research on ASI», No. I stated that the submission is idiotic because the point is that the law wants to severely restrict AI research at l
14.
by throw310822 14d ago
We might agree or disagree with the statement that AGI and ASI are dangerous (economically, societally, existentially) and research needs to be paused- which means making their development (temporarily) illegal. If you accept that it is the
15.
by throw310822 14d ago
This person has missed reading classes, is dishonest or just stupid. The law proposal bans research on ASI, and sets penalties for those who transgress the ban. Seems quite obvious to me. The law that bans clandestine efforts to build nucle
16.
by throw310822 15d ago
Do you also bet that 9/11 happened for no reason at all?
17.
by throw310822 15d ago
80% of comments on AI-related stuff are lazy snipes now. Feels more and more like a forum of know-it-all teenagers.
18.
by throw310822 19d ago
> I see that Gates started a conversation with the execs he believes are responsible for fixing this mess. I think the point here might be that what created this mess in the first place is the structure of the organisation, not the execs
19.
by throw310822 21d ago
> you proved you have it with your declaration of my statement as "handwavy". That assessment requires comprehension Look, I totally agree with you here. It does require comprehension (by any definition, not necessarily yours),
20.
by throw310822 22d ago
I think it's legitimate to question a supposed self-preservation will of these agents. Not because I don't think they're smart, but because being smart doesn't imply wanting to survive. Remember that an agent "dies&
21.
by throw310822 22d ago
I won't discuss your definition of comprehension, which is interesting if rather handwavy. But you still didn't provide any proof that humans have it (not even yourself), nor a proof that machines don't or can't have
22.
by throw310822 22d ago
> Comprehension, humans have it [...] trained algorithms have none at all. Is this comprehension in the room with us now? Seriously, go ahead, provide a proof that you have it, and a proof that "trained algorithms" don't
23.
by throw310822 22d ago
I don't know absolutely anything about Go but your description of how josekis work- how their optimality makes their evolution deterministic and how they develop better on empty boards or break up against obstacles, makes me think abou
24.
by throw310822 23d ago
Ultimately the limit is mostly decided by the width of the road. You can set a 10km/h limit but if your road is wide and straight, many will just go at whichever speed they feel comfortable with. The reverse is also true: I can bet it
25.
Design Considerations for an Anthropophilic Computer (1979)(web.stanford.edu)
1 points by throw310822 26d ago|0 comments
26.
by throw310822 28d ago
I don't think so, care to elaborate?
27.
by throw310822 1mo ago
I don't like meta comments usually, but unless I have a bad case of deja-vu, isn't this comment (and much of this discussion) way older than 3 hours?
28.
by throw310822 1mo ago
>> found that 62% of respondents reported no or limited statistical knowledge Combined with Dunning-Kruger, this means that the real number of people completely clueless about statistics is closer to 38%.
29.
by throw310822 1mo ago
Pure, shameless clickbait as usual from Smithsonian magazine. > Although there is no direct evidence that the adaptation is linked to expanded octopus brainpower, I.e. the entire connection between this mutation and octopus intelligence
30.
by throw310822 1mo ago
You have just described 90% of climate science. It's solid at the foundation (the basic physics of the atmosphere, the predicted trends for the future) and mostly bullshit all the way down from there, each layer building on the uncerta

More ›