wand3r

6 ms·

61.
by wand3r 2y ago
This is primarily for US citizenship right? Do you offer US citizens help with emigrating as well?
62.
by wand3r 2y ago
Ah, I fell prey to the double negative and reread the article. I'll leave my comment for histories sake.
63.
by wand3r 2y ago
Seems to be a positive thing coming out of the Trump government, all other things being so.
64.
by wand3r 2y ago
Maybe they are just catering to what the market wants? It could be that people who are early adopters in online immersive virtual reality want to see or be men with "ta tas".
65.
by wand3r 2y ago
I agree, however they probably assume it's their fault or something to do with this arcane black box they use but don't quite understand how it works. For me, I bought a single DRM book against my better judgement because it was t
66.
by wand3r 2y ago
Why? The Democrats are on track to not see the inside of the executive office for the next 12 years. If the Trump term is moderately popular and he anoints a successor like Vance, it will be pretty unlikely the Democrats will win for 12 yea
67.
by wand3r 2y ago
Driverless taxis already exists?
68.
by wand3r 2y ago
I think we'll have a decade of chaos but not because of this. A lot of stories during the election cycle in news media and on the internet were simply Democratic or Republican "fan fiction". I don't want to make this pol
69.
by wand3r 2y ago
> This argument ignores the fact that there were other alternatives to Uber at the time, ones that didn't break the law! Yes, and they owe their current existence to Uber paving the way for them.
70.
by wand3r 2y ago
Well, as we have just seen, California doesn't have a handle on risk management or insurance pricing. So I wouldn't look for them to set the standard for the industry.
71.
by wand3r 2y ago
I know nothing about this field, but if the main claim is personnel shortages, it seems like reducing your workforces hours by 75% would not be optimal.
72.
by wand3r 2y ago
A lot of naive uninformed people who had no expertise and were told by experts how they could never contribute to a problem or field have successfully built businesses funded by the very people who created this community.
73.
by wand3r 2y ago
This is kind of like the argument that communism is great but no one has been able to implement it correctly yet. "Setting targets" having highly paid DEI consultants, and identity based hiring is what DEI is. Lowercase diversity
74.
by wand3r 2y ago
> I know, I know. The evidence is unambiguous that the bar was lowered, deliberately, over many years and with direct knowledge. The evidence is unambiguous that a cheating scandal occurred. The whole thing is as explosive as any I’ve se
75.
by wand3r 2y ago
Where are you buying this? Might be handy for a job search. Zoominfo basically doesn't have a b2c offering and I am not paying several thousand for an experiment in improving my career
76.
by wand3r 2y ago
This is really cool! Don't all the ladder test cases that achieve >~50 simply snap the PETG implements though? So isn't the test capturing the force to snap PETG at that thickness vs. the actual bonds?
77.
by wand3r 2y ago
Thanks. I'm not particularly for or against Mr. Beast but this is mostly the kind of thing I would expect from an influencer. Guess he is not as wholesome as advertised if this stuff is true.
78.
by wand3r 2y ago
Can someone provide a tl;dw? I don't have time to watch a 53min video, and it's tough to skip around the way one might in a structured article. Curious what the main claims are?
79.
by wand3r 2y ago
I share the general disappointment but to steelman a positive outlook: People in power have always done horrible things and orgs like wikileaks and some from the media counterbalance this. While this was a tragedy, if not for such a strong
80.
by wand3r 2y ago
Yeah, I remember how it felt when I first used Google. You could search something like "xck-956-fg" and some obscure part would show up. Obviously they have amazing technology as some of that "magic" is still there when
81.
by wand3r 2y ago
Thats a pretty cynical take. The likely overly optimistic take would be that it would provide a level of usefulness of a highly paid and highly competent personal assistant.
82.
by wand3r 2y ago
To be fair, in the post he estimates it would be 85% of his net worth but says, please don't worry about us we are fine. The headline is disingenuous because he didn't lose 85% of his net worth he just passed up the opportunity to
83.
by wand3r 2y ago
I dislike censorship but I dont mind* moderation. Twitter is impossible to use because you have 0 buy in and common ground. I have no problem with a subreddit that wants to show beheading videos that moderates non-beheading videos from bein
84.
by wand3r 2y ago
I'm speaking off the cuff but intuitively, like all roles, it obviously depends on the company and caliber of the person. What you are saying is kind of like, why does anyone need a CEO, employees generally know what to do. Maybe LEGO
85.
by wand3r 2y ago
> Imagine if either Biden or Trump died Please don't give me false hope like this
86.
by wand3r 2y ago
I live in the Greater Boston area and you can still find decent meals for say $18 takeaway. I saw the chart on reddit and can't find it right now but McDa prices effectively doubled in the last 5ish years. Many fast food places way out
87.
by wand3r 2y ago
I don't use it too much anymore personally as too many attempts literally just failed at dispatch and never made it to the model. I don't want an opinionated search engine. I use Kagi now and it's been pretty good so far. I a
88.
by wand3r 2y ago
OpenAI has proven to be WAY too opinionated about information access for me to trust it as a search engine. I believe they COULD provide a high quality search experience but they definitely will NOT.
89.
by wand3r 3y ago
I am not a Google employee but my comment is referring to the prolific reports that at Google trust & safety is basically DEI enforcement. The All In podcast does a deeper dive on Google culture and how the trust and safety department a
90.
by wand3r 3y ago
Glad to see the pendulum swinging back on DEI. Being racist against "the right people" is, and always will be, racism. I don't know if Google's culture is too broken to fix but they really seem to be the corporate equiva

More ›