4 ms·
Seems to be a positive thing coming out of the Trump government, all other things being so.
by wand3r 2y ago
Seems to be a positive thing coming out of the Trump government, all other things being so.
- drpossum 2y agoTo be clear: Your is stance that non-compete and stay-or-pay agreements do not interfere with employees' labor rights and that broadening their applicability is good? Because that is what happened.
- wand3r 2y agoAh, I fell prey to the double negative and reread the article. I'll leave my comment for histories sake.
- drpossum 2y agoI have great respect for this response.
- CrimsonRain 2y agoDo you have to sign noncompete before joining the job or after? If before, why not find another job? Is anyone forcing you to accept a job with noncompete? If after, they should be banned.
- fnimick 2y agoAnd if companies collude together to all agree to use non-competes to depress salary (reminder that this has already occurred), what would you recommend?
- jfengel 2y agoGoing to the federal government to .... ohhhhh ...
- CrimsonRain 2y agoOpen your own company.
- crooked-v 2y ago> Is anyone forcing you to accept a job with noncompete? If every job has a noncompete, the alternative option is to starve. Jobs with noncompete clauses now include things like fast food counter work (https://thecounter.org/biden-targeting-non-compete-agreements-executive-order-push-workers/ https://thecounter.org/biden-targeting-non-compete-agreement...).
- CrimsonRain 2y agoIf every job has noncompete, either people are OK with it or there are not enough jobs (supply/demand) or you are not good enough (companies will bend over backwards otherwise). Alternative is to start your own company and don't use noncompete.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]