w0m

30 ms·

391.
by w0m 4y ago
Git is the answer. Inline rendering and versioning/sharing baked in.
392.
by w0m 4y ago
IIRC, FB was originally public-first before (lawsuits). Not API, just default privacy settings.
393.
by w0m 4y ago
The argument would be sustainability I believe.
394.
by w0m 4y ago
Stock went from 350 to 250.
395.
by w0m 4y ago
> it should put the driver on high alert or disable the system. The precedent is there, prior EAP did this. One interstate I frequent; it would do the interstate merge on ramp/junction fine going north; but heading south (with a 27
396.
by w0m 4y ago
slight correction >Agree. And they did the right thing by actually renaming it Raku and skipping the version release. should be >Agree. And they did the right thing by actually renaming it Raku and functionally killing the language.
397.
by w0m 4y ago
True. For some perspective, half my work group wasn't yet born in the time periods you're referencing.
398.
by w0m 4y ago
> "i mean people who argue for privacy would never have a problem with barcodes on milk" I mean; unless you pay cash for ~everything your spending habits have generally been wide open since the 50s in the name of convenience.
399.
by w0m 4y ago
Absolutely love this. Great job Tom.
400.
by w0m 4y ago
> There is a constant push from the Neovim camp that Vim is stagnant, backwards, dead, etc. None of this is true, and the messaging should absolutely stop. Frankly, I’d be happier if they rebranded from Neovim, because IMO they’re not vi
401.
by w0m 4y ago
Seriously True. I bought my 3 in 2019; and my biggest hesitancy at the time was Musk being (insane) and tanking the company preventing me from keeping the car on the road long enough/resale value. Today? I do <3 my car, but I'd
402.
by w0m 4y ago
Anything that has enough users interested to watch :)
403.
by w0m 4y ago
> Vim has not, to the best of my knowledge, copied any features back from neovim vimscript9, terminal, async among others. NeoVim was a kick in the pants for Bram to pull Vim into modernity.
404.
by w0m 4y ago
Bram/Vim had a clear minimalist philosophy. Many wanted More from Vim; namely things like Terminals, Async, better scripting, etc. Bram wasn't going to add those updates/upgrades (for philosophical reasons). So the communit
405.
by w0m 4y ago
I don't think it's as much "Success of others" as it's "Musk is a twatwaffle". I say this as a daily EV driver.
406.
by w0m 4y ago
Those camping trips are why I <3'd my Taco and will likely get something similar in the future as the kids get older. > The vast, vast majority of truck owners use it in some way that a passenger vehicle is completely unsuited fo
407.
by w0m 4y ago
You're misconstruing his comment. Not 'No one needs a Truck'. But, 'Most truck owners don't need a truck". I also will say I don't think anyone is talking about taking the option for owning a Truck away
408.
by w0m 4y ago
Picture you're going down the highway not really paying attention to cars around you outside of general safety. Lifted dodge aggressively pulls infront of you; forcing you to spike breaks before it's engine revs and you're c
409.
by w0m 4y ago
> I'm sure you have reasons for downplaying this, but I would follow this with "and told them, in your face losers", or something to that effect. Why would I ~ever mention it when it's somehow contentious? Family memb
410.
by w0m 4y ago
> Sure, but you should stop selling your product like it can do all of those things and more. Its outright lying. This is the response I hate. Detractors say that to argue against any adoption. It's not a claim any sane proponent (M
411.
by w0m 4y ago
Operator owning charger also means markedly cheaper rates. .36c vs .08c per kwh as a crappy anecdotal reference near me. in the north east. The $$ savings may make installing the infrastructure in loading/storage bays worthwhile.
412.
by w0m 4y ago
This. I purchased an EV for the daily commute ~3 years ago. A family member got angry and railed about how it was already a failed technology as they likely couldn't replace their f350 towing 4-wheelers deep into the woods. Infrastruc
413.
by w0m 4y ago
> using Tesla car owners as unpaid betatesters Almost right. Charging Tesla owners to beta test their autonomous driving software.
414.
by w0m 4y ago
I'm honestly not sure that's a bad thing; bitcoin has been pretty horrendous for the planet on a number of fronts and I'm not sure I've actually seen any value yet.
415.
by w0m 4y ago
If you only care about 'it mostly didn't crash' as the end-goal of a company, that would be a reasonable take.
416.
by w0m 4y ago
For one; it's not transferable. I paid ~2k for Boost for my Tesla; functionally the same thing. But at least if travels with the car if I sell it (if you find someone who values it properly). Subscriptions like this is just burning t
417.
by w0m 4y ago
I loved evernote ~10-15 years ago; used it for ~all personal stuff. Eventually it became more metered/locked down (I don't remember specifics anymore) and i moved to OneNote.
418.
by w0m 4y ago
I'm not sure i 100% grok the OW2 backlash we're seeing at the moment. It's a f2p game and has a middling reward model for the battle pass. That's pitch fork worthy now?
419.
by w0m 4y ago
This. Tesla needed to create it's own standard to make EVs possible. It then held onto it as it's golden-goose; milked the network lockin/advantage. Regulators going around them to open the network after-the-fact means a
420.
by w0m 4y ago
I assume the 'hire to fire' metrics are for engineering; not warehouse. Two different labor pools. I assumed the warehouse attrition rates were due to the work being taxing (and audited). It pays well but you can get much more

More ›