tchaffee

29 ms·

391.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> I don't think anyone on the accessibility team was interviewed So you don't have a source to back up your claim. > Banning people for political speech is an accessibility issue It is not. [1]. You don't get to widen t
392.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> If Twitter becomes interoperable with other services, this is literally the opposite of tech neofeudalism. It's not interoperable. It's controlled by one person. Like Facebook. When that changes we can discuss it. But until t
393.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> Based on talking to those who dislike him So anecdotal evidence? > they're mostly pretty hating him for things he hasnt done, views he doesnt hold and traits he doesnt have So they have actual reasons to hate him. Superficial r
394.
by tchaffee 4y ago
That doesn't tell the real story though. Actual alternatives to these services do exist now and have some popularity. So some people do actually move. MySpace is an example of an eventual mass exodus. Anecdotal, but I personally know a
395.
by tchaffee 4y ago
You are wrong. The act or practice of conspicuously displaying one's awareness of and attentiveness to political issues, matters of social and racial justice, etc., especially instead of taking effective action. [1] And from the pers
396.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Getting good PR and having disastrous PR are not the only two possible outcomes. This could have been managed far better. But Musk is impulsive and there are PR consequences to being impulsive. You could also consider that Musk rushed into
397.
by tchaffee 4y ago
You avoided my question. Can you provide your source for your claim about Facebook?
398.
by tchaffee 4y ago
For the same reason companies have security teams. Or frontend and backend teams. Engineers can't be experts in everything. There is far too much to know.
399.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Source?
400.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Only one average person needs to own Twitter stock for my statement to be true. And the number was far higher than one. And yes, of course pension funds count. Why wouldn't they?
401.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Of course. What's your point?
402.
by tchaffee 4y ago
I said some people don't like him. I guess it's also true some people find him despicable. What's your point?
403.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> we have zero indication. That's a gross mismanagement of sweeping changes. Which is in itself an indication. Anyone could have predicted people leaving the platform if they were told ahead of time how the layoffs and extra hours w
404.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> we have zero knowledge So a grossly mismanaged change from a PR perspective. Of course there is going to be fallout from that.
405.
by tchaffee 4y ago
By your reasoning hating on Kevin Spacey is also in vogue. It's probably not in vogue. It's more likely that his own words and actions are resulting in lots of people not liking him. Imagine that. A world where your own words and
406.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> basically we don't know Yes, it has been grossly mismanaged from a PR perspective. Expecting no fallout from that is naive.
407.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Not liking Elon Musk and moving to a different platform is taking an action. Taking action is the opposite of virtue signaling.
408.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Or the simpler answer that doesn't fit your narrative is that lots of folks don't like Musk and his actions and his approach to running businesses. Lots of people find Musk repulsive. It shouldn't be a surprise that those peo
409.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Twitter also used to be owned by average people. Like most publicly traded companies. So no, it's not from "many rich shareholders" to Elon. It's more nuanced than you're making it out to be.
410.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Twitter was also owned by average people. As are the vast majority of publicly traded companies.
411.
by tchaffee 4y ago
Accessibility is supposed to change and improve. It's fair to expect that to halt when the entire staff has been fired.
412.
by tchaffee 4y ago
What's your source for popularity and does it do a breakdown by demographics advertisers are most interested in? Because I think that tells a very different story from "still most popular with boomers". Their earnings and sto
413.
by tchaffee 4y ago
It's safe to say you don't have a source and just made your numbers up. And you just asked me in another thread for an answer without sarcasm and yet here you are being sarcastic. One rule for us, another rule for you. Whatever in
414.
by tchaffee 4y ago
USD $0.66 is cheap for Brazil. What I said is more specific: I said that it's not cheap for Brazilians who run out of money for food before their next pay. Both can be true if you're not looking for a debate.
415.
by tchaffee 4y ago
You don't know my friends. I do. When my friends say they are left and believe in socialized medicine and other leftist policy, I can comfortably decide they are left. Also note: no true Scotsman logical fallacy. Did you come up with a
416.
by tchaffee 4y ago
I'm not pushing an agenda. This is basic math.
417.
by tchaffee 4y ago
> What percentage of them would you say have the opinion that the Lava-Jato operation was a farce? That depends on what details you ask for. If you ask if them if Moro was biased and corrupt, they can simply point to the court ruling tha
418.
by tchaffee 4y ago
No fine is cheap when you already can't buy enough food.
419.
by tchaffee 4y ago
No, it's the rich who want our money. And they were getting better at taking it. With the labor shortage working class folks are starting to realize no one gets rich if there are no workers and people are demanding better pay. Good for
420.
by tchaffee 4y ago
I live here too. I already said that Lula is the exception. Yes, the more radical left does say that. At least now you're being more specific and more accurate. Your original claim was far more sweeping. And wrong.

More ›