Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rafaelero
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
god they keep raising prices
32.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
Let's definitely wait for replication, but I am honestly not that surprised that it works. I am surprised it took so long for people to give it a real try. It's such an ideal scenario: every experiment is conducted inside the comp
33.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
If they do the same for the coding model they will have a killer product.
34.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
Both sides are not equally wrong, clearly. Until yesterday prediction markets were saying the probability of an AI getting a gold medal in IMO in 2025 was <20%. So clearly we should be more hyped, not less.
35.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
Indeed it's a very unsophisticated and obnoxious audience around here. They are so conservative and unadventurous that anything possibly transformative is labeled as hype. I feel bad for them.
36.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
Gary Marcus is so systematically and overconfidently wrong that I wonder why we keep talking about this clown.
37.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
> If it’s mostly a social phenomenon in your company that non believers are pushed out, that does not seem like a fun place to work. It's not really intentional. It's just that he's slower than the rest of the team and it
38.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
I have been working in software for about 6 years and we are working in a new startup building our product. LLM's have been fundamental and it makes things so much faster.
39.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
Right now, I’m noticing how my colleagues who aren’t very comfortable using LLMs for most of their work are getting sidelined. It's a bit sad seeing them struggle by not keeping pace with everyone else who is using it for ~90% of our t
40.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
This should be used for high entropy tokens during pre-training.
41.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
2025 and we are still discussing if LLM's are intelligent or not, gee.
42.
▲
by
rafaelero
1y ago
Maybe it's your understanding of reality that it's flawed.
43.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
So why did you feel the need to post that next-token prediction is not the reason this behavior emerge?
44.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
It requires only a little bit of imagination to figure which industries are most likely to be disrupted by AI. If you calculate the size of those industries, the upside is huge. Let's pick transportation and healthcare: we already have
45.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
They should sell for a price it would make pirating it pointless. Like what Spotify or Netflix did to audio and visual content. Then they can use the exposure to find other ways to make money.
46.
▲
A New Way to Guide LLM Reasoning
(wtheck.substack.com)
1 points
by
rafaelero
2y ago
|
0 comments
47.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
Intelligence is also not a skill, but the thing that makes you skillful in all cognitive tasks. Just like what height does to basketball players.
48.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
A [meta-analysis of all RCTs]( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28526025/ ) seems to suggest there's no real difference between these kinds of fats. Is there a particular reason you are using only one study to draw s
49.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
Any RCT's showing it is incredibly more dangerous than butter or other vegetable oils?
50.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
They do work, mainly for keeping a remissed cancer at bay.
51.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
But if disabled workers are less productive shouldn't we expect that?
52.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
They should incentivize homes to install batteries. That could absorve energy when price is low and relieve pressure when price is high.
53.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
But they say they will never produce a better model than what is available in the market.
54.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
It's probably not possible, which makes all these initiatives painfully naive.
55.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
Oh god, one more Anthropic that thinks it's noble not pushing the frontier.
56.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
It's what surveys are showing. Why would they lie?
57.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
Do you have access to ChatGPT? You can try it yourself (you can query GPT-4o and GPT-3.5 afterwards). The difference is large enough to be noticeable at least 80% of the time in my experience.
58.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
> So, yeah, GPT4 is much better than GPT3.5, but it's got a long way to go before it becomes real AI. I don't disagree. Just wanted to highlight the poor intuition of the guy doing the video.
59.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
More than 60% of programmers are already using it and finding it useful. Boston Consulting Group conducted a trial and concluded that it increases quality of their consultants work while decreasing the time it took to finish it. So no, you
60.
▲
by
rafaelero
2y ago
Even more people seem to struggle with the concept that it may be underhyped.
More ›