prucomaclu

5 ms·

1.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
Judge Kenny's judgement is below: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/... For the specific claim that we are discussing (poll challengers being kicked out at TCF), his ruling
2.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
> For the specific claim made above (Biden and Trump both filled in, going to Biden), if I recall it was one of the witnesses during the Michigan legislature hearing. To follow up on this, specific citation is below. This witness starts
3.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
> Start by making a specific claim. Specific claim: During the counting at the TCF Center in Michigan, Republican poll watchers were denied their legal right to meaningful observation. This resulted in many hours of counting without ove
4.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
> And those judges were probably presented solid evidence that amounted to more than conspiracy and hand waving. The problem is, that many of the judges themselves are guilty of hand-waving away the evidence/affidavits. Take for exa
5.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
Thanks for the links. I have reviewed the first link some weeks back. From what I can tell, the judgement falls under the "casual dismissal" category. Aside from the fact that the judgement is loaded with clearly biased editori
6.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
> The judge didn't see it that way: > "This court has no authority to take away the right to vote of even a single person, let alone millions of citizens." That's his opinion and he's entitled to it, but it&#x
7.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
For an executive summary of the evidence available, the Texas lawsuit is a good starting point (first 36 pages). https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/ima... For Michigan specifically this
8.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
Maybe it just seems this way, but it seems like it's been a very long time since a US President has not started any new wars. I agree with you - it is a point in his favor that he's at least trying to pull out of these wars. I thi
9.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
For the specific claim made above (Biden and Trump both filled in, going to Biden), if I recall it was one of the witnesses during the Michigan legislature hearing. For your other citation requests, please see: https://cdn.donald
10.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
In Michigan, based on testimony/affidavits: 1) The poll workers were almost exclusively Democrats. 2) It was only Republican poll watchers who were being thrown out 3) Republican poll watchers were not replaced after they were thrown o
11.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
> unable to point to anything convincing? It's pretty well documented that poll watchers were denied their lawful right of meaningful observation. The counter-claim to this is that the poll-watchers were being rude/abusive but
12.
by prucomaclu 6y ago
The Arizona case was denied essentially because the affidavits were declared hear-say, because the testimony wasn't provided during court. I'm not a lawyer, but that doesn't make sense to me. First, it took weeks to document