Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lfodofod
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Private trackers are small, uninteresting targets. Even the big private trackers have less users in total than you can find in individual public swarms.
62.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> Public evidence is hard to track down (especially quickly) since raids on private trackers are so rare And why is that? It’s because nobody cares about private trackers. It’s not like it’s particularly difficult to find the people behi
63.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> Public trackers are the low hanging fruit, but when a private tracker gets raided they'll jump at the chance. Do you have evidence to support this happening, or are you just speculating? How many people got in trouble after the Wh
64.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
If you’re going to include a bunch of screenshots of text, it might be a good idea to not compress them till they’re unreadable. Maybe even use PNGs?
65.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
It’s pretty late, so I might be missing something. However, neither of those groups seems to be releasing netflix content? The first does bluray remuxes on HDB (a private tracker). I don’t think they directly release anything on public trac
66.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> https://www.cashmanlawfirm.com/list-of-strike-3-holdings-cas... This is about people downloading torrents from public trackers. These law firms do not care about private trackers, there is more money to be made on
67.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> This is like setting up a premium subscription library to keep poor people out - the "slums" are precisely the people who benefit from a public library the most With those people come automated abuse reports and law firms try
68.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> It's more like a bunch of people trying to show who has the biggest e-penis (ratio, highest upload, etc. Literally nobody cares about that stuff anymore, most members have been on these sites for so long that things like ratios ha
69.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> Every one I've ever seen. At a minimum they'll want an email address or to chat with you on some service like discord that requires a sign up. The process leaves breadcrumbs everywhere. It’s kind of trivial to get a throwaway
70.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
No, this appears to be some even less relevant (hard to imagine, amirite?) trackers stealing content from IPT.
71.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> They force you to create accounts and hand over personal info that can get you busted later when the site gets raided What tracker forces you to hand over personal info? > just silently handed off to the authorities who run it thems
72.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Dude, I know exactly how not hard it is because I have done so. The fact remains, zero scene groups figured this out.
73.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> And there are more than enough groups directly release their content on public trackers for anything remotely popular (any Netflix series fall into this category) Name one! Or link a torrent. I’m pretty sure you will only find shit q
74.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Why hate private trackers? That’s where all the good quality content on public trackers comes from. Without private trackers, it’s not obvious that anyone would have bothered to extract Widevine keys and set up decryption pipelines for all
75.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Because your torrent client will never find those dedicated servers, and instead wastes all of it’s connection slots on the Indian residential connections. Also because there’s no incentive for anybody to seed public tracker content on serv
76.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
This is not correct, swarms on good private sites are way better than on public trackers. With real world torrent clients, you’d much rather have a swarm with 100 dedicated servers on 1gbps+ connections than a swarm with a million Indian
77.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
None of these are major (private) torrent sites, torrentfreak is just hyping up bullshit as usual. Just looking at the filenames makes it obvious that these can’t be from any major private tracker, there’s no way BTN or the likes would ac
78.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
So what? Vast majority of transactions don’t benefit from the vast speed advantages cryptocurrencies offer. Bank transfers are perfectly fine if you’re happy to wait a few days for the money to arrive. What’s the point of moving goalposts
79.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> I do not understand how bitcoin would be better over bank controlled transaction. Because you get cash in Kiev within the hour, instead of in a couple of days.
80.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
There are multiple cash desks in Kiev processing millions worth of transactions every day. You can easily send 100k from anywhere in the world and have it cashed out within the hour. > to be able to rescue your money, you need to find so
81.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> but does Ukraine not have banks that accept wire transfers Of course they do, it’ll just take at least a day for the money to arrive.
82.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Buying drugs on the internet? Need to rapidly transfer money to a country like Ukraine? (exchange desks in Kiev are still working, processing millions a day)
83.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
> What you seem to have discovered are client-side vulnerabilities that would require direct network access to the client machines to be exploited It’s so weird how many people (developers!) actually seem to believe this. Websites can se
84.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
This story reeks. It’s extremely difficult to believe that there was “intense legal wrangling” as the article claims. Odds are that SBFs lawyers offered to waive extradition in exchange for the government not opposing bail, and the govern
85.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Epstein killed himself, nobody covered it up. Why are you polluting HN with baseless conspiracy theories like this?
86.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Or don’t do any of those things and use an adequate password instead.
87.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Perhaps there were no more people to charge? This was probably mostly Epstein’s and Maxwells private hobby, they presumably did not go around advertising the fact that the girls were underage.
88.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Ghislaine Maxwell was specifically charged with trafficking children to Epstein.
89.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
Were you arrested? No? How is this supposed to refute the GP comment if not?
90.
▲
by
lfodofod
4y ago
This attack is nothing new, has been endlessly discussed by the grapheneos team. An accelerometer is just a shitty microphone, even a camera can be a shitty microphone.
More ›