eli

43 ms·

511.
by eli 3y ago
1 if it isn't password protected and 2 if it is
512.
by eli 3y ago
Restaurant group and car dealership owners are what’s keeping common sense alive?
513.
by eli 3y ago
Damn near all of them. I would challenge you to find a defense attorney who would, in general, advise you to consent to a search even if you "have nothing to hide."
514.
by eli 3y ago
I don’t follow. Wouldn’t supplychain be equally a problem for third party repair vs apple insisting they do it in house?
515.
by eli 3y ago
This is terrible advice based on a real misunderstanding of the law.
516.
by eli 3y ago
https://foia.wiki/wiki/FOIA_Basics
517.
by eli 3y ago
If I give the uranium back and they want to search my house anyway they better have a warrant
518.
by eli 3y ago
https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/12/23204950/bmw-subscription... (I believe they rolled it back after an outcry)
519.
by eli 3y ago
No it was a bunch of cute little web videos by Jenny Slate at least a decade before there was a real movie.
520.
by eli 3y ago
They don't sit around with zero dollars either though, right? Even without a wealth taxes there are situations where someone may need to borrow or sell assets to cover a tax bill. The billionaires will be ok.
521.
by eli 3y ago
Maybe if you only read the headline? I find the article pretty clear, though brief and not very well written. The actual report it's discussing is crystal clear. The situation is that the wealthy keep getting wealthier without generati
522.
by eli 3y ago
Seems silly to debate a hypothetical tax you extrapolated from a single sentence. The "billionaire's tax" Biden proposed earlier this year is closer an income tax that also includes unrealized gains and only if there are tens
523.
by eli 3y ago
A wealth tax doesn't need to be perfect to be better than not having one. The wealthy will always have access to the best lawyers and accountants who can find ways to gain an edge here and there. That's o; or at least it doesn&#x2
524.
by eli 3y ago
It's called "Buy, Borrow, Die" -- in that scheme no one ever pays capital gains tax. https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trov...
525.
by eli 3y ago
That's obviously the case, but what would you have Microsoft do about it?
526.
by eli 3y ago
Only because of how we've chosen to define income.
527.
by eli 3y ago
If an unencrypted laptop is lost or stolen you have to assume all the data on it is compromised, send breach notifications to affected customers, etc.
528.
by eli 3y ago
Yes it does though? The legal entity of the company still exists, it’s just no longer conducting business or paying employees. Thats a mass layoff. The California version of the WARN Act explicitly covers terminating business operations.
529.
by eli 3y ago
It’s common but that’s no excuse
530.
by eli 3y ago
Why didn’t employees get more notice? Why wasn’t WARN Act triggered?
531.
by eli 3y ago
"I get an annoying amount of spam" is a very different operational condition than "the FCC disconnected my provider so I can't make or receive calls"
532.
by eli 3y ago
I think most providers have a shortcode you can "forward" spam texts too. Based on my experience with T-Mobile the reports just go in a circular file. The same number could keep sending the same message and it isn't blocked b
533.
by eli 3y ago
How leveraged is that daily trading, I wonder?
534.
by eli 3y ago
Among other reasons, wouldn't it be more suspicious if they suddenly stopped?
535.
by eli 3y ago
My understanding is it's much more about demand than patents. LED panels got cheap because we built factories that pump out a lot of them.
536.
by eli 3y ago
What a bizarre argument. I don't think "business regulation" is the only or even the primary dimension of the left vs right axis.
537.
by eli 3y ago
eBay is a merchant
538.
by eli 3y ago
The movies that people most want to see are the movies that people most want to see.
539.
by eli 3y ago
That story is extremely thinly sourced and shouldn’t have been published. But once published I really disagree with the decision to delete it. If you publish an article you have an obligation to archive it. Put a huge flashing disclaimer on
540.
by eli 3y ago
You don't worry that it will include hallucinations? Seems like it would be hard to tell if it's summarizing a chapter or inventing a chapter based on its title and context.

More ›