That story is extremely thinly sourced and shouldn’t have been published. But once published I really disagree with the decision to delete it. If you publish a

That story is extremely thinly sourced and shouldn’t have been published. But once published I really disagree with the decision to delete it. If you publish an article you have an obligation to archive it. Put a huge flashing disclaimer on the top of you must, but people should be able to read it on your site. Removal is going to needlessly fuel conspiracy theories. It increases the power of the original story. You’d think wired would understand that.