Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bluthru
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
361.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
>Taste is a really difficult thing to optimize for due to the subjective nature. No one tastes locally grown produce and thinks, "this is OK, but I really prefer the flavor of the produce that's genetically engineered to not br
362.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
I was comparing a desktop OS (Win 10) to a desktop OS (OS X).
363.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
https://www.tekrevue.com/tip/disable-automatic-app-updates-m...
364.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
I remember Kevin Rose saying something about "Digg not being something my mom could use." In an effort to grow the audience, v4 was trying to be more of a source for all news and less of interesting links that were posted and dug
365.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
IF is great for reducing body fat percentage while increasing muscle mass, but someone starting the day with protein will increase muscle at a faster rate.
366.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
That could also indicate that you are too dependent on carbs and therefore your brain has a difficult time on "fat burning mode".
367.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
>The fact that research shows that breakfast is actually beneficial for children is hand-waved away because 'reasons'. As a casual observer of this topic, it seems like breakfast is necessary for humans who want to grow: kids a
368.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
When the bosses wanted iPhones, the company got iPhones. When the bosses want to plug in their electric cars, the parking lots will get charging stations.
369.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
Blowing up inside a tube would be a lot more expensive than blowing up a train on the tracks. But then again, someone could just plant a bomb on the outside of the tube so I guess it's moot.
370.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
It's true that wealth is not zero sum, but many of the things that wealth buy are zero sum. Political influence, time, land, attractiveness, power, etc. are all about sorting you relative to others. No matter how much new "wealth&
371.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
I agree that this is one of the reasons Apple is investing, but Apple is already collecting street-level data: https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/apple-maps-van-0... Maybe we'll see a 3d street view
372.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
I would be shocked if most people in our obese country don't eat after dinner.
373.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
I'm skeptical that there is enough data to be so sure. Some say it's better for drivers avoiding pedestrians: http://www.osram.com/osram_com/news-and-knowledge/led-home/l... While others say it make
374.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
>It's much more enjoyable to walk through the less well lit block than the more well lit ones. I'm guessing this isn't the Tenderloin.
375.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
Why would they be different in this scenario? One side is brighter with more accurate colors.
376.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
>Your eyes adapt, though. Not to the point where one would feel as safe on the right as they do to the left. >the right is more consistent overall That's because of the fixtures--there's a reason they are causing lens flares
377.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
If the existing was the left side and the new was the right, would you feel the same way? I would definitely feel a lot safer on the left side, which is one of the main goals of night lighting.
378.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
It'd be one thing if it was NASA, but a private company? What's the point?
379.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
Is there any new technology in the 3 that wasn't already shipped in the S or the X? Call me crazy, but I don't think the 3 will give them the production headaches that the S or X gave them.
380.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
Controlling the XYZ of a finger just to show menus would be cumbersome. The less :hover the better.
381.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
I feel Apple would be better as a private company but it's too late at this point.
382.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
Cars don't scale. People get around in high density cities without cars just fine. It saves money and it's better for the environment, too.
383.
▲
by
bluthru
10y ago
Yes, but they aren't mutually exclusive.
384.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
>The entire premise of the article, as far as I can tell The premise of the article is that choice is good for workers, and urbanity fosters choice. Corporations creating isolated campuses removes choice and reduces quality of life. >
385.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
From an instinct perspective I definitely agree with you. Apple shouldn't be selling any computers that aren't retina, they're taking too long to get rid of the MacBook Air, the iPad line is too crowded, etc. However, Apple i
386.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
>urban areas are perfect for housing worker drones That's what I'd call the suburbs: Nothing to do, no competition, and labor is kept cheap. http://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/stuck-in-1950s-subu...
387.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
>finally going to liberate us from crowded, noisy, polluted urban prisons What are you, a suburban developer from the 50's? Urban areas often provide a higher quality of life than The Geography of Nowhere. Do some introductory resea
388.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
>States actually have rights, not just individuals States are arbitrary and given rights by individuals. States cannot feel the effects of any law. States are not citizens. >(Short summary: any power can become a tyranny, so keep othe
389.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
States are just a collection of individuals. Laws are made by human beings, not land. House: Californians and Wyomingans are equal. Senate: Wyomingans are 48 times more important than Californians. It doesn't balance out. If you'
390.
▲
by
bluthru
11y ago
One being proportional to population while the other is biased towards low population doesn't balance out. You would need another chamber biased towards high population.
More ›