101404

14 ms·

91.
by 101404 6y ago
It became awful around 2016. One of my interest areas is political and usually pretty controversial. I have a degree in the area and decades of practical experience. Reddit was one of the few places where I occasionally found people with si
92.
by 101404 6y ago
What scientists? Scientists had said is okay to open. The State government said it's okay to open. Only some local dude didn't want to. And thank you for calling me an "asshole".
93.
by 101404 6y ago
Simple, talk only about things the CCP approves. It's about time the West left China and focused on India. The Chinese society needs a generation or two to catch up politically, after three decades of insane economic and social changes
94.
by 101404 6y ago
What is "anti social" about defending human rights against those who think they stand above them?
95.
by 101404 6y ago
And large part of the population seems all too willing to just follow these local officials and blindly believe anything they say. And those who dare to challenge them get insulted.
96.
by 101404 6y ago
So accessing a web site is illegal? I rarely see explicit "you are allowed to access the HTML files on this server" anywhere.
97.
by 101404 6y ago
That's why VPNs exist.
98.
by 101404 6y ago
You don't need UBI for that, just a healthy social welfare system, and a health insurance system that doesn't depend on the job.
99.
by 101404 6y ago
That's illegal. You want me to opt-out in order to stop spamming me? Nope. I will never click a link in some spam mail I receive. Even if you claim that your service is "legitimate". If you want to be allowed to email me, you
100.
by 101404 6y ago
How can a city with so much income and smart inhabitants become such a #$*@&? What happened?
101.
by 101404 6y ago
Socializing is just as easily possible when working from home. Just meet for a coffee in Zoom or Skype or Whereby and "video chat" for an hour or so. Those are usually my most productive meetings.
102.
by 101404 6y ago
No, it means that there's a way things are usually done, but if, in you situation, a different way works better, you are free to use it without having to fight the framework.
103.
by 101404 6y ago
Not sure about the rules in the US out that country. But it's it really a crime to go to work? Especially some national law and state law seem to allow it. Just the county's burocrats seem to prohibit it.
104.
by 101404 6y ago
It was the same in 2000 with anything internet, and then again some years later with Web 2.0. Simply switching to "scam mode" may sound good in a forum post, but you miss the interesting stuff too.
105.
by 101404 6y ago
Not sure if sarcasm or serious...
106.
by 101404 6y ago
I wonder why they are "rich". Hmm.
107.
by 101404 6y ago
Open borders and UBI are mutually exclusive. There, I said it.
108.
by 101404 6y ago
No, on the contrary. Germany has about 4 times as many ICU units as France, Italy or the UK. That's why we had so low fatality numbers, because hospitals never even got significantly above 50% capacity.
109.
by 101404 6y ago
No career politician would want to work with him. Musk says the things like they are, without regards of "party position" or what his fans' ideologies see as "okay to say". Pretty funny to watch it on Twitter, when
110.
by 101404 6y ago
Isolation? I think the name "social distancing" isn't a good choice. It should be called physical distancing. Because socially, you can be as close as ever, just use video chat. Whereby, Zoom, Skype, etc. to hang out with gro
111.
by 101404 6y ago
So how does a few weeks in banking compare to several decades in physics, battery tech, software development, rocket engineering? Why are a couple of weeks decades ago so important to you?
112.
by 101404 6y ago
In reality, he graduated in physics. I never heard that "banker" story before, but a month long internship is hardly a career. He went on getting physics scholarships for UPenn and then Stanford.
113.
by 101404 6y ago
Do you have a source? Because in Canada, he went to school and university, studying physics, and then got a scholarship for a master's at UPenn, and later for a PhD in Stanford. All was in physics.
114.
by 101404 6y ago
You didn't read the comments correctly, hence your confused reply.
115.
by 101404 6y ago
No, it doesn't. See, I have the better argument!
116.
by 101404 6y ago
Please be less racist.
117.
by 101404 6y ago
So a single billionaire should decide what people can and can not talk about? My guess is you are a Monarchist then?
118.
by 101404 6y ago
So if TMobile or Verizon would drop your call, because you mentioned some political candidate's name, that would be completely okay with you?
119.
by 101404 6y ago
How is it misleading? It's completely true. And, is Fb now a judge in the US who should decide these things? I don't think it's good to trying to justify what Fb is doing.
120.
by 101404 6y ago
Of course it's technically possible. They would just need to do the blocking on the client, before sending the message (or after receiving it).

More ›