4 ms·
It was the same in 2000 with anything internet, and then again some years later with Web 2.0. Simply switching to "scam mode" may sound good in a forum post, bu
by 101404 6y ago
It was the same in 2000 with anything internet, and then again some years later with Web 2.0. Simply switching to "scam mode" may sound good in a forum post, but you miss the interesting stuff too.
- TeMPOraL 6y agoIt's not that unjustifiable if almost every cryptocurrency-related project out there turns out to be a scam. I'm not saying nothing will ever come out of this technology - just that, at this point in time, it's wise to approach every such project as fraudlent until proven otherwise.
- rasengan 6y ago> It's not that unjustifiable if almost every cryptocurrency-related project out there turns out to be a scam. Please make a list of the scams that exist within the top 200 coins. If this can’t be done or it’s a nominal percentage of them, then this statement you made is false. There are definitely a few people loudly calling projects scams on HN. That doesn’t suddenly make every project a scam - it just shows ignorance. It’s similar to racism - judge a book by its cover so to speak.
- WorldMaker 6y agoIf one believes that the Proof of Work algorithm/behavior itself is a scam at a technological level, then the onus is on you to prove which of the Top 200 coins has a valid business model with a valid sustainable growth model. Building lots of git commits until you get a commit hash that starts with the right number of zeroes is a fascinating scam that is wasting so much computing power, energy, etc that it almost should be a crime, whether or not you believe that these git commits with lots of zeroes in the hash numbers are used for anything more than nearly criminal Ponzi Schemes beside that.