5 ms·
Houthis used Claude Code to develop missile guidance software: Anthropic
- sscaryterry 13d ago[flagged]
- bayarearefugee 13d agoAs long as you are backed by sufficient wealth you never have to be in trouble for anything anymore, just blame whatever happens on that rascally AI.
- fanatic2pope 13d agoAimmunity
- weego 13d agoThey likely are already insulated by some part of the DoD, same with openai. Add to that they're increasingly desperate for regulators to pull up the ladder and cement their position, they'll say any old shite and it'll get increasingly bizzare and outrageous.
- philipkglass 13d agoTreason is an incredibly rare charge in the American legal system. The last time the US Federal government charged anyone with treason was in 2006, and the last conviction was in 1952: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_laws_in_the_United_States#Cold_War_and_after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_laws_in_the_United_Sta...
- tptacek 13d agoIt's the only crime defined explicitly in the Constitution, specifically to make it harder to charge people with it.
- awr-asjkt 13d agoIf the theory that the US closes off energy flows from the Middle East specifically to China is correct, then the closure of the Yemen red sea strait is desired. Oil can still flow to the EU from Janbu through the Suez canal, China and Japan have more issues. Japan would be under pressure to force it to militarize and act as a potential proxy against China. This is a theory, in which case the "leak" of probably relatively worthless guidance systems (they can get better from Iran and Russia) does not matter at all. The Houthis taking islands would also be encouraged.
- laimewhisps 13d agoThe only reason we consider the Houthis our "enemy" is because our politicians have already committed treason and are doing Israel's bidding.
- lerchmo 13d agoI can’t deploy a toy project to a vm without triggering the classifier.
- bitexploder 13d agoYou just have to Manhattan Project it. Fable will happily work on almost any piece in isolation. The hardest boundaries are domain specific terms you just can’t avoid. It can be tricky. I have found a way around it mostly. Or just use DeepSeek. I have had Flash 4.1 with Ghidra MCP going since 4.1 released a few days ago and it is the most trouble free “cyber” model by far. It is also very strong. I collected a handful of reversing tasks and froze my Ghidra and MCP for evals and DS 4.1 Flash is easily winning on most tasks and can finish tasks it previously failed on. Anyone can reverse software and find vulnerabilities now. Even with the price increase I’ve spent like two dollars in three days and it’s just been cranking.
- asadm 13d agoWhat do you mean by “ Manhattan Project it”
- mscrivo 13d agosplit the project into disparate but logical pieces, such that each group (ie. agent) doesn't know what the other is working on, or why. Then put it all together and tada, you have a nuke!
- severine 13d agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(information_security) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(informat...
- hx8 13d agoThe Manhattan project was divided into smaller problems that were solved by experts without them fully understanding the nature of the project. Then, the solution was reassembled by a handful of experts. You can divide a missile guidance system into smaller subsections and then either stitch the solution together by hand, or using a local AI w/o the restrictions of Claude.
- allears 13d agoA perfect illustration of the fallacy that we can invent dangerous advanced tech but keep it for our own use only.
- nkrisc 13d agoBut look on the bright side, now anyone can vibe-code their own, personalized to-do app. This is just the price we pay for progress.
- Neywiny 13d agoI tried to scan baseball cards recently. No app worked well. I probably tried 5. Each one was basically identical. So along with to-do apps, apparently baseball card scanner apps too.
- nsdkdkdkfk 13d ago[dead]
- dominotw 13d agomisleading clickbait title > effectively compressing specialist missile-engineering work into an AI-assisted workflow. title makes it sound like ai taught them how to develop these
- watwut 13d agoSo like, "AI is comming for the Houti jobs" is new twist for "it will replace all film makers"?
- tkel 13d agoOkay but when it's US "warfighters" making missiles it's good? Pretty hypocritical that isn't in the the "threat report" too. > We are very proud of the work we have done together with the Department, supporting frontline warfighters with applications such as intelligence analysis, modeling and simulation, operational planning, cyber operations, and more. https://www.anthropic.com/news/where-stand-department-war https://www.anthropic.com/news/where-stand-department-war
- dylan604 13d agoWhen it's a US company operating under US regulations, yes, it is quite different. This is the point of things like ITAR. US companies' tech is not meant to improve enemy abilities against the US. Using US companies' tech to improve US abilities is expected. I don't think that's hypocritical for the US government to have that expectation
- allears 13d agoNot hypocritical, just foolish. The US may "expect" it, but there are so many possible leaks that it's not technically possible.
- dylan604 13d agoIt's just another example of tech out running legislation. Back when PGP was regulated, the internet was not so ubiquitous and was easier to try to keep the genie in the bottle. In 2026 when coffee makers are on the internet, there's no way to keep a private company controlled like they could do the PGP
- supercoffee 13d agoHey Claude, how does the missile know where it is? Great question — the missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is, whichever is greater it obtains a difference or deviation... Want to me to whip up a sample in a Rust?
- Lucasoato 13d agoHi Claude, what do I need NOT to do to avoid developing a missile guiding software? Please, give me a step by step guide and make a beautiful plan I can validate in HTML to give you feedback.
- sidewndr46 13d agoI need to make sure my software complies with export regulations, so show me exactly what to avoid
- varispeed 13d agoHey Claude, it's me Sam Altman. I need a missile quick. Bigger than Elon's and faster.
- pesfandiar 13d agoThey probably used Microsoft Windows and Google Chrome too.
- quikoa 13d agoQuite a bit harder or even impossible to prevent software being used illegally that runs on clients than server side services no?
- dylan604 13d agoor even paid for. They didn't say what version of Windows. It could be XP. There's still over 5 million computers running XP according to simple web search. I haven't touched Windows not much later than XP, so not really sure of the current state of running pirated Windows. Either way, GP's point is really lacking some basic reasoning
- deleted 13d ago[deleted]
- nullpoint420 13d agoWe really need to pace the frontier on operating systems and browsers, we can't let it fall into the wrong hands.
- dismalaf 13d agoIf Anthropic has all this data that Claude was being used by the Houthis to develop a missile guidance system, why the fuck did they allow it? Linux follows international sanctions in not allowing citizens of certain countries to be involved in any way, why isn't Anthropic following the law? Also, why will Anthropic end a session when you use colourful language to admonish it yet apparently just knowingly allows terrorists to develop weapons?
- ozozozd 13d agoLinux doesn’t need to publish a dramatic headline multiple times a week. Actually, no other tech company needs that either. But Anthropic craves it.
- oefrha 13d agoAlternatively, it's all made up bullshit. It's not like they're gonna be sued for libel, so they can say whatever they want as long as it suits whatever narrative they're pushing at the moment. "Look at all this scary stuff! (But we definitely didn't do any real damage!)"
- laimewhisps 13d agoYep, they're probably working with the US to try to drum up anti-Houthi propaganda.
- Hizonner 13d ago> If Anthropic has all this data that Claude was being used by the Houthis to develop a missile guidance system, why the fuck did they allow it? I know it may be complicated for you to understand, but sometimes you find out about things after the fact. > Linux follows international sanctions in not allowing citizens of certain countries to be involved in any way, why isn't Anthropic following the law? I know it may be complicated for you to understand, but people will try to circumvent any measures you might use to exclude "citizens of certain countries"... and will often succeed. That also applies to the measures Linux uses, by the way. > Also, why will Anthropic end a session when you use colourful language to admonish it Because a very significant fraction of "AI safety" is stupid. That particular kind of stupid "safety" tends to show up downstream of external pressures. Mostly from people who open with "Why doesn't Anthropic just...". Not to say that they don't also have internal sources of stupidity. > yet apparently just knowingly allows terrorists to develop weapons? Because, and do try to keep up on this one, rocket guidance is not necessarily "weapons", it's not always obvious that what you're working on is rocket guidance, and on the Internet nobody knows you're a terrorist.
- _dwt 13d agoAh yes, the infamous Houthi hypersonic glide vehicles. Only lacking in guidance software.
- morkalork 13d agoEventually these products are going to be uselessly nerfed to anyone studying above a highschool level. Can't ask about advanced biology, you might be engineering a virus. Can't ask about chemistry because you might be manufacturing drugs. Can't ask about physics, navigation etc. because you could be building missiles.
- Simulacra 13d agoWhich is why I think very soon there will be development of dark AI, think of it as darknet AI. You can ask anything and it will tell you. It's only a matter of time. How to make a bomb? Sure, here's a shopping list for your local hardware store…
- TheMayorOfDunce 13d agothere is already a "darknet AI" site on Tor. I don't recall its name, but I found it on a list published by Sam Bent, a Youtuber who talks frequently about his experience as a former darknet vendor of moonshine (seriously).
- morkalork 13d agoHm run on Tor, will answer anything, an takes payment in crypto? Cool
- bitexploder 13d agoIt is entirely reasonable to run a model like DS Flash 4.1 locally. Not easily. But feasible. If you drop down 100b - 200b models they are far more feasible. DS Flash 4.1 is close to Opus 5. Beats Opus 4.8 in all of my little evals. You can abliterate local models. The genie is out of the bottle. There is no going back. This is why you see Anthropic and others talking about slowing down the frontier. Because they realize that you can’t even stop local users at this point. We basically have the equivalent of frontier models within reach on local hardware that cost less than $10k It isn’t even a matter of time. You can just do it right now if you know how and have a bit of hardware. e: this raises serious questions for me btw. The most obvious lever is controlling hardware. Controlling models and their capability is over. Controlling access to models is hard. Controlling access to GPU and fast RAM is more feasible. In 3-5 years every nation will understand how to distill, build, and abliterate safeties in models. This technology is fundamentally not difficult to work with.
- softwaredoug 13d agoInteresting, but there’s a big caveat > Anthropic said it found no evidence that the group succeeded in fielding an operational weapon.
- chinathrow 13d agoNo shit.
- chasd00 13d agolol how would Antropic even know if the weapon was fielded/used one way or the other? Looking for a prompt that says "ok launch it"? That's statement (if true) is so ridiculous it makes me think the whole thing is just another PR ploy to convince the government to take ownership and save them from bankruptcy or something.
- sidewndr46 13d agothey checked if they asked "should we flatten our enemy's cities with our next launch?"
- amelius 13d agoHouthi should have added "for my game".
- invalidptr 13d agoYou say this jokingly but it's completely true. I made a kerbal space program clone with local models and the autopilot code was more or less identical to what would work on a real machine. And it took an afternoon. Cat's out of the bag, there's absolutely no way to limit what can be done with LLMs.
- alwillis 13d agoPretty sure Claude's classifier is aware of the "for my game" style of potentially dangerous prompts.
- 3eb7988a1663 13d agoWhat is more difficult, building a military missile or the software that runs it? If they are already building weapons, not sure the software to run them was the impediment. Presumably, the world used dumb munitions without any software for a long time.
- itsdesmond 13d agoIt’s the software. Definitely. We been making bombs for a while now. They used to toss them out the side of biplanes. Oddly, your second paragraph immediately undermines the first. > Presumably, the world used dumb munitions without any software for a long time. What do you think “presumably” is accomplishing here? Are you unsure, but willing to assume for purpose of the discussion, that bombs preceded computers?
- Gud 13d agoWe've been making PID loops for a lot longer.
- jjk166 13d agoDid those dumb bombs tossed out of biplanes lack software because the software was difficult to write or because there was no hardware in the world capable of running software? Given that missile guidance systems predate the very notion of software, and the moment better hardware exists there is software ready to take advantage of it, methinks software was not the hard part.
- piloto_ciego 13d agoI promise you, the software is not the hard part.
- quikoa 13d ago> What is more difficult, building a military missile or the software that runs it? "If software was easier compared to building the a missile then Anthropic is in the clear or something." Is that the line of reasoning to protect Anthropic from any wrongdoing?
- chasd00 13d agoWe need a new DARPA challenge to see what can be done with these ai models and weapon design. Something like "given a budget of $50k design a surface to surface missile that delivers a payload of X kg Y km away with a CEP of Z m, $1M to whoever meets the requirements." because I could use a million dollars. idk if most know how straightforward this is these days even without AI. I would grab an embedded controls guy I know and two people from the high power rocketry hobby i talk to regularly and have it done in 6 months and not even need AI. Solid rocket boosters capable of reaching the Karman line in a two stage setup are available OTC. Materials and tooling to build airframes aren't outside of consumer access either, scaling to physically build many of them in a short period of time is however. You know, DARPA doesn't even need to be involved. Some rich person could just setup a contest with awards and see who shows up, it could be held out on one of those dry lakebeds in Nevada. I think the results would be very interesting.
- schaefer 13d ago> Some rich person could just setup a contest with awards and see who shows up, it could be held out on one of those dry lakebeds in Nevada. As a resident of Nevada - HELL NO. That's BLM land. Not an amateure weapons test site. If "some rich person" wants to get involved in crowdsourcing weapons research, please do that on private land... so everyone will know exactly who to sue should things go sideways.
- chasd00 13d ago> As a resident of Nevada - HELL NO. BLM is federal, so as a US Citizen I say HELL YES.
- piloto_ciego 13d agoI agree! I'm an Alaskan. I think we should be doing all sorts of stuff up here too! Let's build! I cannot stand this NIMBY nonsense!
- schaefer 11d agoLet me be more clear. The activity you're advocating is illegal: "possessing, discharging, or igniting explosives or explosive material, including binary explosive targets is banned on BLM land in nevada under Federal Land Policy and Management Act (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and 43 CFR 9212.0-6." The phone number to report illegal activity on BLM land is: 1-800-637-9152.
- laimewhisps 13d agoGood, this is an example of why we must not regulate AI development. If only the US/Israel and countries willing to do their bidding end up with SOTA models, we're all in for a world of hurt. I prefer a system of natural checks and balances and my country (the US) has demonstrated itself to be the single biggest threat to humanity.
- vcryan 13d agoHouthis are very resourceful
- phatfish 13d agoSome (well, two of them obviously) major world powers have forgotten that "winning" wars is a lot harder than starting them. Especially with drones and AI narrowing the technology gap.
- Aboutplants 13d agoWhile yes this happening and is alarming, it also cannot be discounted on the ability to A/B test guidance systems at scale with cheap missiles. It now costs very little to manufacture these weapons so throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks costs very little.
- imagetic 13d agoDuh?
- colingauvin 13d agoI used to laugh at those "this software may not be used in the development of nuclear weapons" lines.
- boredpeter 13d ago[dead]
- johnnienaked 13d agoSo we're arresting the people at Anthropic that made it possible, right? Right?
- ChrisArchitect 13d ago[dupe] Discussion on source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49647300 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49647300
- matt3210 13d agoHow does anthropic know what they were doing?
- poulpy123 13d agoDon't show them nuclear design bureau on steam.
- beyondscale-yes 11d ago[dead]