oefrha

3 ms·

1.
by oefrha 6d ago
> the ~government~ implicated itself provided FTFY. Almost one and the same here but gives more context.
2.
by oefrha 7d ago
If AI coding isn’t lowering your code quality, you have a low starting point.
3.
by oefrha 7d ago
I want to take this seriously, but eight (slop?) rehash of the story on the blog isn’t helping with credibility. Pro tip: don’t do that, however triggered you are, it definitely doesn’t help. I don’t use Google AI Studio so can’t verify, go
4.
by oefrha 8d ago
I’ve also seen people put a lot of effort and love into poster and stuff because that interests them (doesn’t mean they’re good at it either), then the event is utter crap because they didn’t spend much time on the actual event.
5.
by oefrha 8d ago
I fail to see how I’m “dissing AI”. I use it almost every fucking waking hour after all, both professionally and personally. I just don’t pretend it’s free/cheap (especially when you mention it in the context of “everyone only the plan
6.
by oefrha 8d ago
I’m paying $200/mo for non-crap versions of said “general-purpose problem-solver tool”, which is not far from the median income of “everyone on the planet with Internet connection”. And I’m told I’m already getting a huge discount by u
7.
by oefrha 9d ago
Btw there are so many "critical" vulnerabilities in libheif I can't even tell if I have them all patched. Just awesome. https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/security/advisories?qu... https:&#
8.
by oefrha 9d ago
They did say how: > We then placed Claude in an autonomous /goal loop against our own Discourse Cloud instance, proxied through rce.ee/ctf-forum to make it look like a CTF target as Opus refused write exploit for remote instanc
9.
by oefrha 9d ago
Unsandboxed ImageMagick is known for being a security nightmare even back when PHP ruled the world (not saying sandboxing is a panacea either, it just requires a different and potentially harder exploit to develop a full chain). Difference
10.
by oefrha 9d ago
Kudos for at least admitting upfront that it’s pure slop, I guess.
11.
by oefrha 9d ago
The quota consumption is based on the upfront possible number of connections given the query, not actual connections, so deeply nested queries can be very expensive if not aware and careful about it.
12.
by oefrha 11d ago
Got acquired => got paid. CSS-Tricks the entity (up to the point of acquisition) got paid the money. If and how the money was divided between the people involved doesn’t seem be public info.
13.
by oefrha 11d ago
In this case CSS-Tricks got paid $4m first, so probably the wrong entity to be complaining about funding. But maybe the lead editor in question who’s not the creator didn’t see much of that?
14.
by oefrha 12d ago
This is certainly not just affecting interim releases. Ubuntu 26.04.1 has been released but is currently held back from do-release-upgrade for the LTS channel (which IIRC is unusual for a LTS's .1 release) due to rust-coreutils issue:
15.
by oefrha 12d ago
Given that Safari needs the most debugging and automation tooling for Safari was hardest to come by, this is a welcome change. I wonder if it works with pages on a connected iPhone though? Anyone tried it? Because debugging on iOS Safari is
16.
by oefrha 12d ago
Not to mention my $299 total Tailwind Plus lifetime license (was TailwindUI, then paid the difference for the Plus bundle) has like 100x more stuff in it than $90/yr or $149 lifetime for—check notes—11 UI transitions...
17.
by oefrha 13d ago
Alternatively, it's all made up bullshit. It's not like they're gonna be sued for libel, so they can say whatever they want as long as it suits whatever narrative they're pushing at the moment. "Look at all this sca
18.
by oefrha 14d ago
Flash => HTML5 was a travesty for creative little games on the web. It never recovered. Even today the authoring tools are crap for the average person with an idea, if you ignore AI vibe coding for a minute, which overcomes the tooling d
19.
by oefrha 14d ago
It means my mother will have it on, at least, if they use the same pattern.
20.
by oefrha 14d ago
So far Apple has been using default-checked checkbox during onboarding process for OS-level “help us improve…” diagnostics collection. Not sure about this specifically.
21.
by oefrha 14d ago
That’s fine, just let it die. But they gotta milk the goddamn IP dry.
22.
by oefrha 14d ago
Hear me out: if they actually worry so much about the hypothetical of AI mass killing, maybe they should first do something concrete about the reality that their models are deployed right now to kill people in a certain war-torn region
23.
by oefrha 15d ago
Whether it’s intentional requires a legal investigation to establish. Since when is “hey we didn’t mean it!” in a corporate press release enough to establish lack of intent in a criminal matter?
24.
by oefrha 15d ago
It's pretty damn obvious to anyone who ever bothered to look at rtk gain output, no benchmark needed at all. Agent runs rtk command-that-prints-100k-tokens | tail -5 costs 5 lines, maybe 100 tokens without rtk, but rtk will repo
25.
by oefrha 15d ago
These are utter bullshit that breaks every norm, but may be convincing enough for some non-academic OpenAI cheerleaders who post dozens of comments on these topics.
26.
by oefrha 16d ago
It’s quite amazing that in a support doc for normies, they’re literally linking to https://developers.yoti.com/identity-verification/supported-... for supported IDs which opens with GET https://api.yoti.c
27.
by oefrha 16d ago
> You obviously need humans Try to contact Anthropic or Google support, they clearly don’t think so.
28.
by oefrha 16d ago
Have you ever counted the number of times Claude fucked up quoting/escaping and had to issue a corrected tool call? Or get stuck in some tricky quoting situation for two minutes, throwing a couple piles of shit at the wall to see what
29.
by oefrha 16d ago
HN is notorious for armchair <insert-topic> experts for <insert-topic> you actually know, outside of software, computing/computing-adjacent electronic hardware and startups. “Fucking wild” “confidently incorrect nonsense” i
30.
by oefrha 16d ago
No, they asked one guy to do a joint publish conditioned on leaving the other collaborator out, with veiled threats. The joint publish part smells awfully like admission of guilt given there’s absolutely no reason to do it if you believe yo

More ›