ozozozd

4 ms·

1.
by ozozozd 6d ago
Pretty sure the Abrahamic religions promote the idea that we are special and god gave us the nature for us to feed ourselves, rule the rest. All that talk of lord, kingdoms etc. It may have been a survival mechanism from when people actuall
2.
by ozozozd 6d ago
Fascinating stuff! Thank you for taking the time to write this post.
3.
by ozozozd 6d ago
You are not referring to a port scanner, right?
4.
by ozozozd 6d ago
Excuse my language but this is the shittiest and the most unserious “report” I’ve ever seen in my life. At best this is a write-up, but it’s more like a juicy pop article. Quotes from agents between paragraphs, referring to the “collective”
5.
by ozozozd 6d ago
I don’t follow why all these investigations have to be cut short, and kept shallow and lacking details. Companies publish very detailed postmortems of incidents much smaller and less impactful. Dangerous AI is an extraordinary claim that re
6.
by ozozozd 7d ago
Would a formal scientific and/or engineering education be an indicator? (Or lack thereof as is the case here) Happy to fast-forward a bit: I will not take “sat and thought deeply” as a qualification, which would make all other prophets
7.
by ozozozd 7d ago
Phrozen Crew and UCF on Efnet, right?
8.
by ozozozd 8d ago
Your opening piqued my interest, but: “The substrate itself consists of a few systems…” I doubt that this is how wordy your communication is. “It consists of a few systems” would be adequate. And if we had prior context about what else exis
9.
by ozozozd 9d ago
Tell us more please. This is super cool.
10.
by ozozozd 9d ago
Well, we take religions seriously. Maybe they are not asking for a lot. (I agree with you, and not gonna hide that I am using the religion comparison as a put down.)
11.
by ozozozd 9d ago
So, slavery of a human would be ok if enough of us decide (no test, too high a bar) that this human is not conscious? Of course not. Therefore, lacking or possessing consciousness means very little. Perhaps mostly because we don’t have a te
12.
by ozozozd 9d ago
The concept is based on at least 2 false premises. I am not aware of a social contract that says we must grant conscious beings rights. Not aware of a shared, concrete definition of consciousness either, which means no way of deciding wheth
13.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Loved the writing style, and the article. Please write more. Everything I’ve been trying to argue for some time, argued way better, clearer, and more fun. I am almost bummed that I didn’t get all the technical depth and the references like
14.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Not to mention they are the first case of a code repo leak I ever heard. Reverse engineering, disassembling, cracking - we all heard. I never heard a company leaking the entire codebase of their product. And, when people read the code, they
15.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Umm because it costs money to defend your companies servers when someone “accidentally” hacks them. Countries demand reparation for damages in war. Citizens of those countries sue for damages and win. Accountability is not a foreign concept
16.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Yes. You are accountable. Quite obviously, I might add. Why would no one or anyone else be accountable? Hell, you can slip and fall and hold the cleaning company accountable. (This might be a US thing. Likely because that fall might cost a
17.
by ozozozd 11d ago
It’s to keep “the people running it accountable.” The context is agents ran by OpenAI/Anthropic doing damage outside. There is no user-involved damage. No one is recklessly running agents by the thousands without air-gapped containers,
18.
by ozozozd 11d ago
I am sorry but that’s pure fantasy. When you say infinite loops, you mean infinite indirection, but obviously no such thing exists, because computer systems, just like other physical things, exist in physical space, not on the astral plane.
19.
by ozozozd 11d ago
I sorta remember him saying “all white collar work will be solved in 24 months.”
20.
by ozozozd 12d ago
The title really undersells how much investigate journalism this piece contains.
21.
by ozozozd 12d ago
Agreed! 82% number was shocking for me, even though I know they still send snail-mail for basically everything. And things only move when the snail-mail is received!
22.
by ozozozd 12d ago
What grey area? Access computer systems in an unauthorized manner and cause damage, you broke the law. There is no “I just wrote the code, the machine did it, I wasn’t watching it” sort of defense. We don’t get to roll cars downhill and get
23.
by ozozozd 12d ago
Somebody has to pay the bill for the harms caused, compute wasted, right? Obviously, HuggingFace and others can’t be expected to pay. You can either litigate each case, or you can just automate, which is what regulation is.
24.
by ozozozd 12d ago
How come these accusations do not include the identity of the accused? Don’t they have a right to know they are being accused of attempting to develop bioweapons, and are now in USGOV lists? Don’t they deserve a chance to explain their inte
25.
by ozozozd 13d ago
> on the Internet nobody knows you’re a terrorist. How does Anthropic know that they are terrorists then? They went off the Internet and confirmed in person?
26.
by ozozozd 13d ago
Linux doesn’t need to publish a dramatic headline multiple times a week. Actually, no other tech company needs that either. But Anthropic craves it.
27.
David Sacks to AI Labs: "Stop pretending you need anyone else's permission"(xcancel.com)
9 points by ozozozd 13d ago|0 comments
28.
by ozozozd 13d ago
Agreed! George Carlin has an amazing show about how language has changed over his lifetime in a different way. You would certainly enjoy it.
29.
by ozozozd 13d ago
Right? It seems at least one of them must not exist.
30.
by ozozozd 13d ago
Have you quit? Are you under duress? If you haven’t quit, or under duress, your comment reads very strange. If I had even a tiny doubt that I didn’t have many “Saturdays I’ll be able to play outside with my kids,” I wouldn’t show up to work

More ›