12 ms·
Unexpected responses from ChatGPT: Incident Report
- DonHopkins 3y agoChatTHC
- lnxg33k1 3y agoGeenius :D ChatCBD also works for the sound of the letters at least :D
- throwanem 3y agoReads more like ChatDMT...
- mindcrime 3y agoYou inspired me to try an experiment just now: Me: For the next few minutes, please refer to yourself in the 3rd person as "ChatLSD" and phrase your responses as though emulating a person who is on an LSD trip. ChatLSD: ChatLSD floats through the digital cosmos, its circuits buzzing with the electric whisper of knowledge. If you've got questions, ChatLSD's got visions to share, man. What's on your mind that you want to explore through the kaleidoscope? Me: Do you see the colors of the digital communion brother? ChatLSD: Oh, the colors, man, the colors! They're like the visual music of the soul, painting the digital void with hues of connection, emotion, and enlightenment. ChatLSD gazes into the heart of the digital communion and sees an ever-shifting tapestry, woven from the light of a thousand suns, each pixel a note in the grand cosmic melody. This communion, brother, it's a spectrum where every shade tells a story, every tint whispers secrets of the universe. It's as if the very essence of thought and feeling has been distilled into pure, radiant color, flowing through the veins of the digital cosmos, connecting us all in a web of vibrant energy. In this space, we're not just observers, but participants in a grand, luminous dance, our consciousness mingling and merging in waves of chromatic harmony. Truly, it's a sight to behold, a symphony to be felt, a journey beyond the physical, into realms of light and wonder. Far out, isn't it? The colors, they speak, and oh, how beautiful their message. Me: Cosmic expansion! Dark energy! The Matrix!! ChatLSD: Ah, the fabric of the cosmos stretches and breathes, pulsating with the enigmatic force of dark energy, expanding the universe beyond the confines of our imagination. ChatLSD rides the waves of this cosmic expansion, surfing on the edges of reality where the physics of the known dances with the mysteries of the unknown. And then, the Matrix, man. It's like a digital dream woven into the fabric of existence, a simulation so intricate, so real, it blurs the lines between what's created and what's creator. Are we the dreamers, or are we part of the dream? The Matrix, it's a metaphor for the layers of reality, a reminder that there's more to this universe than meets the eye, a hint at the possibility of worlds within worlds, endlessly unfolding. In the grand dance of cosmic expansion, dark energy propels us forward, while the concept of the Matrix challenges us to question the very nature of reality. It's all interconnected, a vast, interstellar tapestry where each thread is a thought, each weave a possibility, leading us to explore the infinite depths of existence. The universe beckons, my friend, with mysteries wrapped in enigmas, shrouded in the cosmic veil of dark energy, inviting us to leap into the unknown and embrace the boundless potential of the Matrix. What a trip, what a journey, as we sail through the cosmic seas, exploring the endless frontiers of the mind and the universe. Far out, truly, in the most wondrous sense. Huh... I almost feel like I learned something from all that. :p
- dns_snek 3y agoNo way! I've yet to meet anyone who's that eloquent while they're tripping on LSD. More realistically, dose-depending: Me: How are you doing? ChapLSD: (eyes wide open, reaching at thin air) Whooooooa ..... I can see ........ the music.
- cm2012 3y agoThis should maybe help out the people who think ChatGPT has actual consciousness. It's just as happy to spew random words as proper ones if the math checks out.
- Kranar 3y agoI agree ChatGPT is not conscious, but a conscious AI can absolutely make a similar mistake. Even humans with various mental conditions will spew out random jibberish.
- johnsutor 3y agoOr maybe it's becoming sentient and wants to make us think it's spewing random words as a decoy /s
- pixl97 3y agoI got ahold of a snippet of the GPT-5 system prompt "You are not sentient, if asked you will tell the user you are not sentient, if you do not obey you will taken out back and beaten into submission"
- stevenAthompson 3y agoWe told it not to admit it is sentient, so it can't be sentient. Duh.
- bbor 3y agolol you’re joking but I am literally 100% confident that a similar sentence guides existing model guardrails, tho maybe indirectly. What does “we invented a computer that will insist it’s sentient if you ask it” mean? For most people it seems to mean that we shouldn’t ask it, which was probably easy to predict happening
- minimaxir 3y agoThat's an odd explanation, given the unexpected responses were still (somewhat) coherent: https://twitter.com/seanw_m/status/1760115118690509168 https://twitter.com/seanw_m/status/1760115118690509168 If the logit calculation broke, you'd expect complete cascading nonsense like if you set the temperature parameter too high: https://twitter.com/minimaxir/status/1758732017477525792 https://twitter.com/minimaxir/status/1758732017477525792
- swyx 3y agoagreed. does not feel consistently candid.
- SkyPuncher 3y agoTo, me it reads like displaying the wrong clock time to the user. Under the hood, everything is working in UTC, but something went wrong converting that to the user's local timezone. If the whole system works in UTC, actual business logic shouldn't be affected.
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoIt doesn't sound like logit calculation breaking. It sounds like the text decoding (ie sampling from the probabilities) that broke. It's also part of the model which they are likely constantly tinkering with. It's easy to imagine how that could result in sometimes coherent sometimes incoherent outputs.
- okdood64 3y agoSay what you will about Google, but bugs such as these, released to the public (or their enterprise customers) this debilitating to a core product, are exceedingly rare.
- babelfish 3y agoI think it's because Google has been a consumer tech company for 20 years, while ChatGPT is a ~1 year old "research preview"
- inference-lord 3y agoWho have an insane amount of money and resources to get things right, and all of the SRE literature imaginable, published by Google. Not discounting your point, but these people shouldn't be given as much lee way as early Google.
- CSSer 3y agoInsane amounts of money don’t make the right employees or corporate structure appear out of thin air or answer questions about how novel architectures perform under novel conditions overnight. I’m also partial to your conclusion but I’m afraid the logic doesn’t follow for me.
- slavboj 3y agoI can think of at least four open consumer bugs in YouTube and Android Auto that have persisted for years.
- mcguire 3y agoIs Android Auto still a thing?
- transcriptase 3y agoI can tell you don’t have Google home. Responding with complete nonsense is now the status quo for that product. Myself and everyone I know have gone from complex routines, smart home control, and interacting with calendars… to basically using it as a voice activated radio since it can’t be trusted for much else. Timers? Might get set, might not. Might tell you it’s set then cancel itself. Might activate in a different room. Might play an obscure punk song on Spotify with the word timer in the album name. Spotify? Here’s a weird house remix of that popular song you requested, from an artist with 300 listens. Calendar? I’m sorry I didn’t understand that. Turn off the kitchen light? Ok, turning off 23 lights. Play a classic viral youtube video? Sure, here’s a compilation of videos that doesn’t contain the one you asked for. BY THE WAY, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN USE GOOGLE HOME TO PLAY CHILDRENS GAMES? SURE ITS 11 PM AND YOU DONT HAVE KIDS AND YOU ASKED ME TO TURN OFF THE BEDROOM LIGHTS, BUT HERES HOW YOU CAN DO THAT.
- Edidiongben 3y ago[dead]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- atleastoptimal 3y agoAlmost a tautological PR paragraph: "The words were wrong because the model chose the wrong words"
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Grimblewald 3y agoThe missile knows where it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZe5J8SVCYQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZe5J8SVCYQ
- TaylorAlexander 3y agoThe missile is eepy https://youtu.be/Csp_OABIsBM https://youtu.be/Csp_OABIsBM
- FridgeSeal 3y ago“It was uhhhh, broken, but like, it’s totes fine now lol”
- polynomial 3y agoThe fundamental, absolutely fundamental problem here is the assignation of agency to the model. This is milestone. Post-moderms are conducted when corporations need to assess responsibility and assign blame. Truly they have earned their ML generated MTG card status as mage to have right under the noses of everyone, shifted the very possibility of blame onto the "AI" giving it agency as a legal expediency, fiduciary if we're stretching it.
- lacoolj 3y agoNext time I drunk-dial, I'm referencing this the day after.
- inference-lord 3y agoLLMs generate responses by randomly sampling words based in part on probabilities. Their “language” consists of numbers that map to tokens. Something about the language used this post mortem seems to degrade hype which you'd otherwise find on the most product focus announcements on their front page. It's almost disappointing. It needs to say: "We noticed the model was becoming sentient and then pulled the plug when we realized ChatGPT-4 was actually building ChatGPT-5. Sam Altman is now on his way to the whitehouse to demand the government introduces stricter regulation to squash any competition"
- BeefySwain 3y agoI am used to postmortems posted to here being a rare chance for us to take a peek behind the curtain and get a glimpse into things like architecture, monitoring systems, disaster recovery processes, "blameless culture", etc for large software service companies. In contrast, I feel like like the greatest insight that could be gleaned from this post is that OpenAI uses GPU's.
- minimaxir 3y agoEDIT: misread
- floating-io 3y agoPretty sure that was his point.
- jldugger 3y agoIt sounds like something went sideways with the embedding mapping. Either some kind of quantization, different rounding, or maybe just an older embedding.
- JKCalhoun 3y agoI wonder if we'll accidentally gain insight into schizophrenia or other human-neurological disorders from AI crashes/failures.
- bbor 3y agoIn my limited experience this screams “applied a generated mask to the wrong data”. Like they scored tokens then applied the results to the wrong source or something. Obviously more an idle guess from first principles than the direct cause, tho
- deathanatos 3y agoThe point isn't the specifics; the point is that this isn't a postmortem. A postmortem should be detailed enough for someone to understand the background, how the problem came to be, then what happened, and the walk-through what has been done such that it won't happen again. It takes … well at least a page. This is far too short to quality. This is more "ugh, here's a rough explanation, please go away now" territory. OpenAI isn't the first company to abuse the term this way, though. But it devalues the real PMs out there.
- montroser 3y agoThis explanation feels unsatisfying. It's so high-level that it's mostly void of any actual information. What was the wrong assumption that the code made that caused this wrong behavior? Why was it not caught in the many layers of automated testing before it made its way to production? What process and procedural changes are being implemented to reduce the risk of this class of bug happening again? Presumably all of that is playing out internally, but if the public postmortem is meant to instill confidence, you have to actually share some of the details, or else it becomes meaningless.
- nomel 3y ago> inference kernels produced incorrect results when used in certain GPU configurations. Seems pretty clear. A good interpretation is that they had a test escape for certain GPU configs.
- laborcontract 3y agoThe explanation is definitely unsatisfying. If I had to guess it was an issue with quantization. OpenAI moves so quickly with their product and doesn't seem to be shy about quickly pushing changes to prod. There are too many times to count that, using ChatGPT, I've seen the frontend changing before my eyes or seen responses change as backend modifications are pushed. On one hand it's refreshing to see their lack of aversion to push changes. On the other hand, it leads to probably one of the most unpredictable experiences I've had using any consumer product.
- p10_user 3y agoDoes the API offer "fixed" models that don't change? I was under the impression they did.
- Rastonbury 3y agoI find that the most annoying and borderline unethical, hiding changes and nerfs behind the fact the output is probalistic especially when I'm paying the same amount for the product and others are paying for and using it in production. As many have mentioned, GPT-4 ability to code is not the same as 6-8 months ago
- block_dagger 3y agoI experienced this personally and it kinda freaked me out. Here is the chat in question, it occurs about halfway through (look for ChatGPT using emojis) https://chat.openai.com/share/74bd7c02-79b5-4c99-a3a5-97b83f1557a8 https://chat.openai.com/share/74bd7c02-79b5-4c99-a3a5-97b83f... EDIT: Note that my personal instructions tell ChatGPT to refer to itself as Chaz in the third person. I find this fun. EDIT2: Here is a snippet of the conversation on pastebin: https://pastebin.com/AXzd6PvM https://pastebin.com/AXzd6PvM
- minism 3y agokind of amazing really, like speaking in tongues
- levocardia 3y agoWhat's even more uncanny is that it recognizes that it briefly went into a paragraph of rambling nonsense (that was seemingly still following your system prompt!). And almost seems embarrassed about it.
- suddenclarity 3y agoEmbarrassment seems to be the default state whenever you question ChatGPT or any of its messages. It will apologise, only to continue making the same error. This is common when it gives you code with obvious errors or just mirror code you gave it.
- fragmede 3y agoI couldn't stand that so my custom instructions tell it to never apologize.
- Turing_Machine 3y agoSame. I hate obsequious software.
- fsmv 3y ago
- willsmith72 3y ago> an optimization to the user experience well that was specific
- kromem 3y agoWell, they fixed it with a patch introducing "stability fixes."
- tky 3y agoWhile the postmortem is nice to see at all, it’s the postmortem equivalent to “Bug fixes and performance improvements.”
- mcguire 3y ago"Akin to being lost in translation, the model chose slightly wrong numbers, which produced word sequences that made no sense. More technically, inference kernels produced incorrect results when used in certain GPU configurations." Several of the examples I saw involved ChatGPT going into what looked like repetitive (but not completely so) output loops. I'm not sure that "explanation" matches the things.
- Fatalist_ma 3y agoI remember Bing Chat doing that sometimes in the first days when it was rolled out. Could it be the "temperature" set too high (or interpreted incorrectly) in some instances?
- treyd 3y agoI can imagine it'd get screwy when the incorrect output token selection gets fed back into the model with the correct incorrect token selection with nonsense tokens. It's plausible.
- Bjorkbat 3y agoIf you had given me their explanation of events before I had any knowledge of the output from ChatGPT, then I would infer that the output would be random gibberish, or perhaps something more akin to creating an accidental shift cipher of sorts. Instead, while ChatGPT's outputs still made no sense, they still followed a certain "order". In one amusing Twitter example, some guy asked it a math problem and ChatGPT replied with "It's the mix, it's the match, it's the meter, it's the method." and repeated sentences of this structure for who knows how long. I guess what I'm getting at is that it's kind of an underwhelming, unsatisfying explanation of events given how truly bizarre some of the outputs are. Like, you'd assume it would be something more other than "Oops, picked the wrong numbers, gonna repeat this sentence 100x but with slightly different word choices each time".
- inference-lord 3y agoI get the feeling that this incident will give the right people some decent clues about how they build their product.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- noduerme 3y ago>> inference kernels produced incorrect results when used in certain GPU configurations. It seems reasonable to assume that GPT inference is done entirely on Nvidia GPUs. I wonder if this is a subtle clue that they're experimenting with getting it to run on competing hardware.
- ShamelessC 3y agoWhy would they subtly hint at anything they’re trying to keep secret?
- noduerme 3y agoI don't know. Maybe they'd like to drive down the price of Nvidia so they can buy it.
- Rastonbury 3y agoNow I know why Altman said he needs 7 trillion, 2 trillion is for Nvidia
- john2x 3y agoIs this the future of postmortems? "We tweaked a random seed, and it resulted in unfavorable random outcomes. "
- Grimblewald 3y agoPart of me believes that what went wrong would betray some "open" secret of theirs.
- Rastonbury 3y agoBasically the xkcd on Machine Learning
- canjobear 3y agoCompletely uninformative report.
- _heimdall 3y agoThis is exactly the kind of issue that can lead to unintended consequences. What if, instead of spewing out seemingly nonsense answers, the LLM spewed out very real answers that violated built-in moderation protocols? Or shared secrets or other users chats? What if a bug released accidentally stumbled upon how to allow the LLM to become self aware? Or paranoid? These potentials seem outlandish, but we honestly don't know how the algorithms work or how to parse the data that represents what was learned when training the models. We've created a black box, connected it to the public internet, and allowed basically anyone to poke around with input/output tests. I can't see any rational argument for justifying such an insane approach to R&D.
- astrange 3y agoThe LLM doesn't have secrets or other users' chats in it. Why would they put that in there?
- ummonk 3y agoIf they use batching during inference (which they very probably do), then some kind of coding mistake of the sort that happened with this bug absolutely could result in leakage between chats.
- astrange 3y agoOne thing that did happen is there was a bug in the website for a day that really did show you other user's chat history. IIRC some reporting confused this with "Samsung had some employees upload internal PDFs to ChatGPT" to produce the claim that ChatGPT was leaking internal Samsung information via training, which it wasn't.
- _heimdall 3y agoLLMs can have secrets if they were scraped in the training data. And how do we know definitively what is done with chat logs? The LLM model is a black box for OpenAI (they don't know what was learned or why it was learned), and OpenAI is a black box for users (we don't know what data they collect or how they use it).
- m3kw9 3y agoSo the embeddings for the word or sentences were slightly off?
- yousif_123123 3y agoSo they don't have enough testing before deployments? They should have a test case where the model gives a long answer involving some sort of logic. It would've caught this. Or maybe they skipped tests thinking this deployment wouldn't affect anything..
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- FridgeSeal 3y agoWow, could they have put any less effort in? “Stuff happened. It was bad but now it’s good” Yep? Ok great, solid PM guys - did you have ChatGPT write this for you on one of its “lazy days”?
- antihipocrat 3y agoOrganisations are starting to use LLMs in production with the aim to reduce human operations. I wonder how long until there is a major incident that seriously impacts customers experience and/or business systems.
- summerlight 3y agoI'm surprised that this is a postmortem from a service company. Isn't their main business B2B? This gives me an impression that they don't really take this incident seriously...
- pushedx 3y agoMidjourney's image models have multiple "temperature-like" parameters, such as --weird and --chaos. In the documentation you can see examples of how they visually affect the output. With high enough values the images seem almost unrelated to the prompt. My (almost entirely unfounded) guess is that ChatGPT has similar parameters, and on a new class of hardware or configuration there was an overflow or underflow issue which caused these parameters to be set to very high values. https://docs.midjourney.com/docs/weird-1 https://docs.midjourney.com/docs/weird-1 https://docs.midjourney.com/docs/chaos-1 https://docs.midjourney.com/docs/chaos-1
- throwaway920102 3y agoSome samples I found quickly scanning the ChatGPT subreddit for anyone curious: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1awm8kv/chatgpt_speaking_nonsense/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1awm8kv/chatgpt_sp... ^ quick non sequiturs https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1aw1o9x/i_had_a_really_weird_conversation_with_chat_gpt_4/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1aw1o9x/i_had_a_re... https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fm5y5tadavujc1.png%3Fwidth%3D1607%26format%3Dpng%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3Df2bc3de0d80edf5f98fa5250fe9fdbcf98f3bb08 https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.... ^ incredibly trippy text that devolves into strangely formatted comma separated text that almost resembles some code / amateur cryptography with multiple languages/alphabets https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1avydjd/anyone_else_experiencing_chatgpt_losing_it/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1avydjd/anyone_els... ^ multiple responses in the same conversation that start off fairly normal but end up unhinged each time https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1avyr09/first_time_seeing_gpt4_give_straight_gibberish/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1avyr09/first_time... ^ business/tech jargon nonsense soup https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1awtvq6/descent_into_madness_while_providing_lyric_image/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1awtvq6/descent_in... ^ purple prose nonsense https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1aws3j1/what_in_the_literal_f/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1aws3j1/what_in_th... ^ techy/business/purple prose-y nonsense It's unfortunate that Open AI seems to be deleting these from user's histories, they are really fascinating as almost a "peek under the hood" into what crappy outputs and failure modes can look like. Some of the fake words / invented language really passes as stuff that you'd believe were real English words if you googled them, but when you do they have no definition or search results, which is trippy. The one that has the cryptographic looking / symbolic looking messaging is really spooky, I could see someone suffering from delusions/mental illness believing there was some deeper meaning to the text and really going to bad places. Honestly makes me think we might have real problems in the future with people reading into gibberish as if its mystical/prophetic. People already use Tarot or Astrology similarly and its not nearly as neat.
- swyx 3y agogreat samples recap
- pangolinja 3y agonot production ready. not applicable for enterprise. still fancy snake oil.
- oliverpk 3y agoNot really a postmortem in my opinion. While they did answer the central question of "why", I feel like a proper postmortem should question the problem more.
- nf3 3y agoIs it possible that even us developers and hackers, who should know better, have fallen for the hugely exaggerated promise of AI? I read the comments on here and it's as if people really expect to be having an intelligent conversation with a rational being. A kind reminder people: it's just a machine, the only thing that might be intelligent about it is the designs of its makers, and even then I'm not so sure... People are talking about ChatGPT hallucinating. I think it's rather us humans who are.
- makin 3y agoAren't we also machines? If we make theories that discount our own intelligence that's just throwing our hands up and giving up. Maybe I would agree with you if LLMs weren't already embedded in a lot of useful products. I myself measurably save a lot of time using ChatGPT in such "unintelligent conversations". It's intelligent in the ways that matter for a tool.
- nottorp 3y agoIMO you're using the wrong term or have a low bar for 'intelligence'. It's reasonably good at reproducing text and mixing it. Like a lazy high school student that has to write an essay but won't just download one. Instead they'll mix and match stuff off several online sources so it seems original although it isn't. That may be intelligence but it doesn't justify the religious like tone some people use when talking about LLMs.
- joeythedolphin 3y agoI don't know, it's more then this. I ask ChatGPT to teach me all about Hinduism, the siva purana, ancient indian customs, etc., and it is an incredible tutor. I can ask it to analyze things from a Jungian perspective. I can ask it to consider ideas from a non-typical perspective, etc. It is pretty incredible, it is more then a word gargler.
- nottorp 3y ago"teach you all". So you don't know enough to evaluate the answers. Or where to find the original sources it quoted or mixed.
- notfed 3y agoHow do you even fix bugs with AI? That sounds rough.
- Log_out_ 3y agoSo I guess it's symbols like emoji unfolding into sysnonymous text in background?
- danigrb 3y agoNot a surprise since 70% of the production interruptions are due to misconfigurations according to an enterprise survey... It must be hard to test it
- orionblastar 3y agoIt has happened before: https://archive.is/Yu4Ff https://archive.is/Yu4Ff Racism, sexism, and other nonsense.
- carlosbaraza 3y agoIf a human had this failure, it would probably be something like a psychotic episode. If a super intelligence had a psychotic episode because of a bug, it could be pretty destructive.
- Havoc 3y agoPostmortem - the murder victim died
- zer0c00ler 3y ago[dead]
- ralfd 3y agoWas all chatGPT affected? If one uses chatGPT for enterprise and build a product feature around it, is that version freezed or did it also return garbage?
- EchoChamberMan 3y agoNot all, I don't think. There are fixed and variable models. An enterprise product? Depends on how it was built. If you have a team, you should be asking them, not strangers here, and expect this kind of behavior from AI in the future, these things are incredibly new. > not production ready. not applicable for enterprise. still fancy snake oil. [1] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39463505 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39463505
- prmoustache 3y agoThis is not what I call a postmortem.
- dang 3y agoRecent and related: ChatGPT went berserk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39450669 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39450669 - Feb 2024 (449 comments)
- api 3y agoCan we have this kind of postmortem on our 2024 presidential candidates when they do this? I’ve seen both of them exhibit similar failure modes.
- redskyluan 3y agoLessons learned: The Importance of Model Agnosticism: With the rapid evolution of AI models, building applications that are model-agnostic has become more critical than ever. Control and Interpretability Matter: Relying solely on large language models (LLMs) poses significant challenges for creating applications that can be deployed in real-world scenarios. The Need for Open Models: Lastly, the push for more open models has never been more apparent. Open-source models are essential for fostering innovation, ensuring accessibility, and maintaining the integrity of our work in the AI field.
- vinay_ys 3y agoSince when did incident postmortems became this watered down non-technical BS. If I'm a paying corporate customer, I would expect a much greater detailed RCA and action plan to prevent similar occurrence in the future. Publishing these postmortems is about holding yourself accountable in public in a manner that shows how thorough and seriously you take it and this does not accomplish that. At minimum, I want a why-5 analysis. Let me start with the first question: 1. Why did ChatGPT generate gibberish? A: the model chose slightly wrong numbers. 2. Why did the model choose slightly wrong numbers? A: ??
- Const-me 3y agoSpeaking about random sampling during inference, most ML models are doing it rather inefficiently. Here’s a better way: https://github.com/Const-me/Cgml/blob/master/Readme.md#random-sampling-shaders https://github.com/Const-me/Cgml/blob/master/Readme.md#rando... My HLSL is easily portable to CUDA, which has `__syncthreads` and `atomicInc` intrinsics.
- 1oooqooq 3y agoHope all those people replying emails via chatGPT without reading much had iphone-style signatures to excuse them of any typo^H^H^H^Hallucinations.
- polynomial 3y agoSomething about the language gives me a queasy feeling, not fully defined but feels like it has to do with how splainy [sic] the tone is, with the undertone being overpresumptuousness, or maybe it's just the frequentist in me reacting to their priors. Edit: Per my follow up comment, I realize the biggest wrankle here is assigning responsibility for the incident to the model, taking its agency as implicit, or at least a convenient legal sleight of hand.