wav-part

11 ms·

61.
by wav-part 9y ago
Why does this apply to one group of people (private industry) but not the other (govt) ? Both are money-seeking.
62.
by wav-part 9y ago
I was just posting this. Its also low latency routing as tor router routes only for directly connected nodes where as internet router routes for all nodes. After certain network size, internet router will become too inefficient.
63.
by wav-part 9y ago
If we, the UK tax payers, gave you the eduction, ... WRONG. Will this meme ever die ? Rich have always been paying extreme majority of the tax revenue. For example according to this recently released official report [1] in regards to the
64.
by wav-part 9y ago
I think you mistook who we are. By we mean those who already are doing TP, not everyone. That would be everyone here. There are enough people for everything. Some can do TP and others SP. If you are capable of doing TP then doing SP is in
65.
by wav-part 9y ago
I think it need to be resaid: Do we make world a better place by progressing technologically/scientifically or socially ? There is really not much time for both. No offence to those who do later, but I like to believe that we do former
66.
by wav-part 9y ago
More informative and most likely original source article : https://brewaz.com/hot-news/bill-gates-entity-invests-80-mil...
67.
by wav-part 9y ago
> As I previously stated: use a computer that fits within your definition of "very easy to secure" to setup the YubiHSM; after that, encryption using the HSM is theoretically secure to the degree the CPU accessing the plaintex
68.
by wav-part 9y ago
Securing computer is lost cause. Thats why HSM exist: a small computer with simple processor, no appstore (only highly tested/secured inbuilt apps), no network access (limited and specific protocol not like IP), very limited functional
69.
by wav-part 9y ago
An ideal HSM serve only one purpose: store secrets (privatekeys/passwords) and give specific access (sign/spend/login). > Most companies consider MITM an external compromise since the malicious actor is not on the machine
70.
by wav-part 9y ago
How can HSMs be considered MITM-proof if does not have dedicated input system (touchscreen/keyboard) ?
71.
by wav-part 9y ago
Not true anymore. https are getting blocked too. Last few lines of `curl --trace - https://thepiratebay.org/` on Jio ISP. Full log https://gist.github.com/anonymous/27ddfa674233d8d17a007f1b3f...
72.
by wav-part 9y ago
No. If some MNC is a global monopoly then the industry is lightly/none regulated by most significant countries. Though, USA is an exception, achived arguably due to history of low market intervention. I would not say that the MNC does
73.
by wav-part 9y ago
In all your examples, state acts as gate-keeper and these are local/national industries. If you have a multi-national company that is monopoly, its very likely to be market granted monopoly. > In a mixed economy, monopoly exists be
74.
by wav-part 9y ago
This thread is confusing State granted monopoly with Market granted monopoly. Economists usually talks about the former.
75.
by wav-part 9y ago
Alt-Bob will still be on min wage and still anxious and fearful due to inflation. And why do you think Govts will do better job at identifying/investing in potential productivity than rest of the market ?
76.
by wav-part 9y ago
EC is not just disagreeing with Apple's legal team but Ireland Govt (IG). Arguably IG is atleast as competent as EC if not more. And then not to mention 3rd parties such USA Treasury. I dont know how EC can justify (in court) violating
77.
by wav-part 9y ago
Here is Apple's appeal. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX... > They both depend on the arbitrariness and non-generality of a company-specific tax ruling. Thats an opi
78.
by wav-part 9y ago
As you say, the threat of invasion was the only reason people banded together physically. Now the the threat is gone, we should see more (as small as possible) city-states because everyone loves freedom and more control over their lives. Th
79.
by wav-part 9y ago
> I've never understood the word canary. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/canary_in_a_coal_mine > What do you mean with it, in this context? The pouplar reason given for the anti-success taxation, is that
80.
by wav-part 9y ago
The popular example would be "fair taxation". And catalonia ref is not fair for other spaniards.
81.
by wav-part 9y ago
What we see in todays world is lot of disagreements. Why ?. Because neither side has consistent interpretation of (social) contract. Why ? Because its subjective which is result of fairism. I am not really a good writer. I hope that clears
82.
by wav-part 9y ago
Fairism is not something you build a stable society with. The individual (usually wealthy) vs majority was the canary.
83.
by wav-part 9y ago
Looks like I am wrong. SEC are also charging with fraud. https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2017/comp-pr2017-1...
84.
by wav-part 9y ago
Wrong Headline. SEC has not charged with fraud rather than with violating anti-fraud and registration provisions . Since almost no ICO implement anti-$FCRIME provisions, even honest ICO can be charged similarly.
85.
by wav-part 9y ago
> Countries are not people, they don't respect or love each other, they oscillate between peace and war. The history of every major nation is a history of violence and conquest, not freely entered union. IMO that has not been true
86.
by wav-part 9y ago
Land or GDP are not gain. So exactly what has China gained ? HKese will not pay more taxes than they were paying. And if forced they will just leave (again) and take GDP with them. You may not fire it but there is cost of creating and maint
87.
by wav-part 9y ago
Assuming we are talking about city-states of problem solvers. Than they will neither compete nor cooperate. They will just pay the market value for a barrel of oil. Instead, the fierce and low-margin/high-risk compitition actually exis
88.
by wav-part 9y ago
Thats why no private city-state will be created near natural resource. It will be extremely stupid.
89.
by wav-part 9y ago
> Power also flows from the barrel of a gun. Warmaking is not as profitable as it used to be. And its only decreasing. What has China to gain from invaded HK ? Problem solvers will just move to another region. If its aggressors vs prob
90.
List of emerging technologies(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by wav-part 9y ago|0 comments

More ›