wav-part

16 ms·

91.
by wav-part 9y ago
As I said this is battle of axioms. The issue cannot be solved with debate.
92.
by wav-part 9y ago
Attacker = Overreeaching Govt/Collectivism. Victim = Individual. > how does that respond to my point? You just asked an individual to justify why its not okey for govt/people to interfere between two consenting adults. But th
93.
by wav-part 9y ago
LOL its like asking victim to prove why attacker should not attack him. The onus is NOT on victim but the attacker. Its the attacker who made the first contact. Its the attacker who has to prove from the mutually agreed upon set of axioms.
94.
by wav-part 9y ago
So you believe regulations will keep you safe from even half-professional criminals let alone state-sponsered ones ?
95.
by wav-part 9y ago
I had -Wall set but I forgot that its misleading. -Wextra is needed for -Wtype-limits and -Wsign-compare.
96.
by wav-part 9y ago
While we are talking about C skills, recently I got hit by this gotcha. I never knew a simple comparision could be this complex. Question: Whats ru, rs ? unsigned int u0 = 0; unsigned int u1 = 1; int s0 = 0; int s1 = 1;
97.
by wav-part 9y ago
I think this is more user friendly. https://foo.com/search?products=couches;color=red;show_recent;
98.
by wav-part 9y ago
One that I have not seen mentioned yet: https://phys.org/ .
99.
by wav-part 9y ago
> 2. The case argued was that the tax deal was illegal when it was agreed upon and therefore void. Sweetheart deals / government aid is generally illegal in the EU, and neither Google nor Ireland should have been surprised. You ar
100.
by wav-part 9y ago
Everyone in the universe is.
101.
by wav-part 9y ago
Being exposed to EC insanity makes Ireland, Netherland makes less appealing now. However there are many more to choose from eg Singapore. > abandoning all EU revenue How ? A corp does not have to exist in EU to recieve payments from EU
102.
by wav-part 9y ago
Because futher down the stack, more reliable a tech has to be. Otherwise good luck debugging. Also agree with heisenbit.
103.
by wav-part 9y ago
> Furthermore, it affects companies all over the world that serves EU citizens. No gdpr applies if companies target EU citizens [1][2]. My personal opinion of the law is that its as useless as cookie law but way more costly and unpre
104.
by wav-part 9y ago
No. Why would OS assume any thing but maliciousness from apps ? The appstore is not part of OS, why would it then perform a security-critical function ? Why would you even involve humans to ensure security ? These are dangerous engineering
105.
by wav-part 9y ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskLibertarians/top/?sort=top&t=all... https://www.reddit.com/r/libertarianbestof/top/?sort=top&t=a... Check out the sidebars for 10-20 more su
106.
Mu Aye Pu: Live Stateless in Southeast Asia?(lfb.org)
1 points by wav-part 9y ago|0 comments
107.
by wav-part 9y ago
Shouldnt then 3GPP do the FRAND enforcement ? After all it is 3GPP who made QCOM techs popular in the market.
108.
2017 Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study [pdf](jbs.cam.ac.uk)
2 points by wav-part 9y ago|0 comments
109.
by wav-part 9y ago
Yes we can. Food & Shelter is cheap. We can very well survive until new marketable skills can be learnt.
110.
by wav-part 9y ago
(Slightly off topic) Looking at the wiki page, In what universe is that criticism of capitalism considering taxation/statism is most obvious example of rent-seeking behaviour ???
111.
by wav-part 9y ago
> Miranda warnings only apply to when you are in police custody. Or in a custodial interrogation as per wikipedia[1]. My point is not every interaction, even if you are a person, is a custodial interrogation. I can stop talking. I can
112.
by wav-part 9y ago
LEO interacting with an app is not same as if it was a person. LEO is not conducting an interview with Uber when he uses the app. UX is not legally accountable response. To whom even Miranda warning will apply to ?
113.
by wav-part 9y ago
Uber is not obstructing any investigation. They are proactively denying service to all LEOs. The mere act of driving or not driving to an LEO for whatever reason is not breaking of law.
114.
by wav-part 9y ago
> E.g. ... Economic warfare is the non-violent weapon. Win is not guranteed but still its very effective. You as water-blocker will lose something if not due to downstream community then others. I also would guess that its a rare scena
115.
by wav-part 9y ago
> I don't see why it would be different here. It would not. But then the water-poor would realize its better to be practicial than idiological. I believe in real life noone is all-poor. One as an individual or group has always som
116.
by wav-part 9y ago
In such discussions, its usually forgotten that how smooth modern travel and migration is. Just make it more smooth/quick then concept of libertarianism/socialism/etc becomes increasengly moot.
117.
by wav-part 9y ago
(Warning: opinions without citation) Collective will has never solved anything. As always it will be technology. Whether you'll be allowed to trade with or travel into another community will depend on the specific rules and agreements
118.
by wav-part 9y ago
Tax Revenue USD/Capita: https://data.oecd.org/chart/4Ont Welfare Spending USD/Capita: https://data.oecd.org/chart/4Ons
119.
by wav-part 10y ago
Still dont you/anyone find these kinds of threads out of place for HN, a VC forum ?
120.
by wav-part 10y ago
Because FG is emphasised as girl not a kid. Gender is important. Opposite of girl is powerful men. Opposite of kid would be just powerful.

More ›