unityByFreedom

10 ms·

31.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> Scanning on-device is compatible with Apple never having access to your data in an unencrypted format. Only if you exclude the following network transmission, which is the easy part that needs no special code. The privacy concern comes
32.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
You understand the person to whom you're replying was nonsensically arguing that cloud-scanning is worse than on-device scanning, right?
33.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
On what basis? I'd really like to hear your justification. Please include as many details as possible.
34.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
You'd have a hard time verifying that said on-device scanning would only have been run only on iCloud-uploaded content. Once the feature exists your local data might become accessible to a government warrant, which would make the iPhon
35.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
The point of encryption is obviously privacy.
36.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
But they backtracked on on-device scanning. So that's not happening unless I missed something. There was a huge outcry when they proposed that.
37.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Messages sent through Apple's systems are not "on-device" scanning. Different topic.
38.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> I see this all or nothing argument when discussing new stuff. When did it become popular to start selling beta products? Did it begin when we all bought into social media? Apple produced a computer, music player and phone that were a p
39.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> Those passengers knew what they were signing up for when they boarded that plane together with a Windows user. The good thing is, once a fix for this is pushed, even laptops in cargo holds will get it. Win win!
40.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Points/karma acquired in-game that can be exchanged off-app for crypto. Since crypto is so easy to exchange with no verification of buyer/seller needed, you can keep moving around how that works to make Apple's task of review
41.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Everyone has faced this to some degree. You want to get your work or message out there and it gets shut down by the powers that be. The question is how to encourage a level playing field. You could have the government step in, however, that
42.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> Apple doesn’t ask for or take a mandatory cut of in-app money transfer services. I suppose you mean like when I use Venmo or my bank. Okay, but I can't readily use those to buy other in-app things like subscriptions, right? So it&
43.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
It is another form of payment. What's to get?
44.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
There may be an anti-trust case against Apple, but if there is, hanging it on crypto is not the place to do it. Personally I am more concerned about Comcast's monopoly and would prioritize the FTC to look at that, but that's been
45.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> Apple's objection was on legality of sending Bitcoin in the regions our app was available, so I suggested we could file a legal brief as part of our appeal. > Brian's response was they had already tried that and that Apple
46.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Isn't it obvious that making crypto payments easier allows devs to circumvent Apple's cut? I don't think people would accept any percentage taken of crypto exchanges. Let's not beat around the bush. This is Apple protect
47.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> features that should be a God-given right. What features are you asking for that apply to this thread? You do not have a god given right for them to follow your policies. > They will always piss people off as long as they charge
48.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
A review of the above three exchanges: "Apple doesn't have dedicated support for established devs" "They do, I was in it" "Why don't they support all devs this way? Apple sux." Added: "They do,
49.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Hahaha. Yes some stodgy bureaucrats surely know more than designers of OS and software. Please. There's definitely a gap to bridge but let's not pretend one side knows everything.
50.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Government going for the win over social media by levying fines. It's a bold move Cotton, let's see how it pays off. Surely government will save us from social media!
51.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
> The conflict of interest is probably more actionable but the official role could make him subject to being an insider. What? No. Kardashian was fined because she advertised crypto without disclosing she was paid for the ad. Presumably
52.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Lol on what grounds could they be held liable? Arguably, people who worked at FTX didn't all know SBF loaned out customer deposits. Even SBF himself claims to not have realized the extent of it. The truth of SBF's claims should
53.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Why? Better payday if you get fired.
54.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
That seems too easy to game.. how many flags does it take?
55.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Just gonna end up censoring what he doesn't like
56.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Good point, and thanks for sharing Starline. I hadn't heard of that. I'd love to see a "Minority Report"-like interface in the form of Starline + Kinect. Oh, and with electronic ink to save my eyes. Thank you, future.
57.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Best comment I saw on this was it's like trying to reinvent VR. We already have VR. Incrementally, maybe there will be some sort of popular VR chat down the road, but it's just too expensive at this point for mass adoption. The di
58.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Sensational headline? It sounds indefinite, not permanent.
59.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
You're still responsible if your lane change causes an accident. I don't see how it's worth $1. Do you trust the system to properly gauge the speed of a vehicle accelerating to pass you? If not then you need hands and eyes at
60.
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
It isn't a bypass. The data was legally obtained and sold. Warrants are needed when the requesting entity doesn't have access.

More ›