4 ms·
Lol on what grounds could they be held liable? Arguably, people who worked at FTX didn't all know SBF loaned out customer deposits. Even SBF himself claims to n
by unityByFreedom 4y ago
Lol on what grounds could they be held liable? Arguably, people who worked at FTX didn't all know SBF loaned out customer deposits. Even SBF himself claims to not have realized the extent of it. The truth of SBF's claims should be determined by an investigation, however I don't see cause to go after these celebrities. They were paid to make general statements by the company, they didn't sign financial statements.
If there is some indication they knew it was a scam, then sure go after them. But you can't just seize everyone's emails because you think there's a chance they were involved. You need probable cause.
- cornholio 4y agoI would love for Larry David to go about his defense fully in character: "Your Honor, I stand by my statements in the advertisement, and still don't recommend anyone to put their money in FTX. Furthermore, I still think stone wheels are a bad idea, prefer natural light, defecating outdoors and doing my dishes while in the shower. As for stupid people voting and their portable music players, I despise them with a burning passion". Probably not solid legal advice even in a trivial case such as this, but would be so funny to watch.
- bigmattystyles 4y agoLD can have an amazing ad next Super Bowl promoting another product saying he was technically correct in his crypto ad.