unanswered

16 ms·

91.
by unanswered 5y ago
> If not enough people get vaccinated, transmission won’t be stopped. The comment above yours literally just explained that the vaccine does not stop transmission of the virus! You're repeating catchphrases from 12 months ago when t
92.
by unanswered 5y ago
> Such as, for case 1, considering Z(Z) halts. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that H(Z,Z) could in fact return true. It could read the code for Z, determine that Z(Z) will loop since H(Z,Z) would return false, return tr
93.
by unanswered 5y ago
> cited examples of hospitals scanning resumes of registered nurses for 'computer programming,' when what they need is someone who can enter patient data into a computer. That's horrifying. Administrative bloat is no longe
94.
by unanswered 5y ago
The vaccine does not stop you from catching the virus and spreading it. This has been settled science for months and months. Stop spreading disinformation.
95.
by unanswered 5y ago
Okay, but you claimed that "there would be no spread". But that is not true for 0 < R < 1. Can you just admit you misspoke instead of arguing a pointless point?
96.
by unanswered 5y ago
> Dr. Hanssen’s survey is also severely flawed and ultimately unreliable. First, he reports that 30- 43% of respondents “regularly” use a Microsoft Windows phone even though Microsoft had 0% market share in smartphones in 2018 and no lon
97.
by unanswered 5y ago
"no spread" is R=0. Vaccinated people are spreading it to vaccinated people as well as unvaccinated. Assuming that vaccinated people don't know that they get it we have essentially created a big cesspool for the virus to spre
98.
by unanswered 5y ago
On the contrary it's the vaccinated people who are sick but don't know that they're sick who are spreading the virus.
99.
by unanswered 5y ago
Your numbers are being used to lie: You only have to get the MMR vaccine once. But you'll have to get the covid vaccines over and over and over. Just four covid jabs would make these events equally likely. But it's most likely tha
100.
by unanswered 5y ago
Your "growing program" can (presumably, since we don't have a formal definition) be interpreted by a finite program; i.e. which can treat unlimited memory as instructions to execute. This means, in a very strict and formal
101.
by unanswered 5y ago
Well if they just kick out all the ivermectin overdoses then there'll be plenty of room for covid patients! What's the problem?
102.
by unanswered 5y ago
This is really interesting info; I appreciate the contribution to the discussion!
103.
by unanswered 5y ago
Share and enjoy!
104.
by unanswered 5y ago
"Covid spike protein", would that be the one which is coded for by the mRNA we're injecting into people's bodies? But that wouldn't make sense because that would be unethical, so they must be talking about a differe
105.
by unanswered 5y ago
They will make more profit on the evergreen version of ivermectin they're working on.
106.
by unanswered 5y ago
You seem to be confused. The studies which "later found it wasn't useful" were fabricated, as was discovered mere days after they hit the news. They weren't even plausible.
107.
by unanswered 5y ago
I'm convinced that most of the people complaining about build times are using docker for some incomprehensible reason and are blowing away the dependency cache with every build.
108.
by unanswered 5y ago
The more people shout the (racist, if you look just below the surface) claim that ivermectin is "horse dewormer", the more other (less racist but more stupid) people are going to ingest the horse paste formulation of it. The forme
109.
by unanswered 5y ago
> but all skin colors are equal I'm sorry but that sentiment is anti-woke, and therefore by definition racist.
110.
by unanswered 5y ago
Expect more of the same. My impression from my years in the Windows org is that the only team with any devs remaining working on the desktop version of Windows is the shell team, and that is being staffed more and more by webdevs.
111.
by unanswered 5y ago
Is disinformation also fundamental to a democracy? Why defend it with irrelevant deflections if not?
112.
by unanswered 5y ago
There were other people present, making it not "unsupervised". By ignoring this distinction both you and the above commenter are spreading disinformation for what appear on the surface to be nefarious political goals.
113.
by unanswered 5y ago
Do you have a source for "an attacker having unsupervised access" to these machines or are you just making that up?
114.
by unanswered 5y ago
You are suggesting "let them eat cake".
115.
by unanswered 5y ago
You can keep your doctor!
116.
by unanswered 5y ago
If you think that this is a recent problem, then that is a perfect demonstration why this will never be solved.
117.
by unanswered 5y ago
1000% chance. But there'll be some good excuse, like switching to a different system.
118.
by unanswered 5y ago
This raises an interesting question: is someone who is waiting for an effective intranasal vaccine to get something more like sterilizing immunity, and foregoing the less-effective vaccine meanwhile, anti-vax?
119.
by unanswered 5y ago
> Anyone should be able to access your public key, and anyone you deal with should be able to ask you to use your private key to verify your identity. First, let's assume the identity would be backed by a somewhat decentralized syst
120.
by unanswered 5y ago
I appreciate that they put the most misleading and misused "advice" up front so the article could be dismissed and discarded as quickly as possible.

More ›