3 ms·
Okay, but you claimed that "there would be no spread". But that is not true for 0 < R < 1. Can you just admit you misspoke instead of arguing a pointless point?
by unanswered 5y ago
Okay, but you claimed that "there would be no spread". But that is not true for 0 < R < 1. Can you just admit you misspoke instead of arguing a pointless point?
- colinmhayes 5y agoI didn't say there would immediately be no spread. It is true that if there are no cases there is no spread. It's not like it would take very long...