unanswered

6 ms·

1.
by unanswered 5y ago
Please show me the part of my comment where I alleged a conspiracy? Or said anything about the woke?
2.
by unanswered 5y ago
I hate to be that guy, but... it's not irony. In this case, it's design. Increasing social injustice is the whole point, because that ensures increased political power for those who campaign on social justice.
3.
by unanswered 5y ago
So in other words all of the non-debunked reasons for <30 to get vaccinated are all about individual health, and have no impact on anyone else's health.
4.
by unanswered 5y ago
They aren't the same, but llogiq is both. (Now just an /r/rust mod.)
5.
by unanswered 5y ago
The problem with this theory is that the moderation team has been entirely supportive of Ms. 'Kill' so far, and actively works to silence dissent about her position in public Rust spaces. (Maybe not so much as the unofficial mods,
6.
by unanswered 5y ago
> saying that employees are striking in 20 countries is completely false. It elicited the desired feelings and therefore it was completely true.
7.
by unanswered 5y ago
So set `X = "other Rust team members"`. Everything else in the comment was just for drama.
8.
by unanswered 5y ago
> Is there any good way to craft a message like this? "We are resigning and our reasons have been shared privately with X group. <eom>" But since the goal of the whole exercise is to generate publicity and drama, the abov
9.
by unanswered 5y ago
As we all know, non-heterosexual people are a myth and probably shouldn't be allowed to work in jobs with anyone anyways ... ?
10.
by unanswered 5y ago
But... he didn't? Most of the studies he found no fault with. This seems to be a striking example of alternate facts you have picked up from the same article...
11.
by unanswered 5y ago
Sure, and I almost edited my original comment when I made it to clarify that as far as we know, Ivermectin isn't a very good protease inhibitor. That's what the fact-check should have said. Instead, we were fed a pile of garbage b
12.
by unanswered 5y ago
> the option to pay with just money simply is not there. You seem to be confused about the concept of consent.
13.
by unanswered 5y ago
If they're anything like me, they've always wanted the ivermectin thing to be worms-at-best-crap-at-worst, but have refused to accept "shut up and stop listening to the wrong science" as evidence in favor of that propo
14.
by unanswered 5y ago
But the only expert opinions they cite are: > Pfizer’s drug has protease inhibitor activity like ivermectin, but they are a very different kettle of fish on a variety of levels and > Dr Walter explained that PF-07321332 is a “direct a
15.
by unanswered 5y ago
> Studies have been done. It has been found lacking. TFA found that more reliable studies found it was helpful than not. You are the one who is anti-science.
16.
by unanswered 5y ago
> contrarianism in search of evidence But that is literally what this article is, and Scott admits as much! He says that he chose worms as the most "trollish" possible response, despite a lack of any strong evidence at all that
17.
by unanswered 5y ago
> And now we’re learning that it was indeed based on lies. No, now we're admitting that it was based on lies. That information has been around for a long time; if not quite all the way to the first allegations, at least very soon
18.
by unanswered 5y ago
Important to note that this is an opinion piece. The New York times has not yet admitted to wrongdoing.
19.
by unanswered 5y ago
A players have a deep understanding of the topics so that very little or no memorization of solutions and techniques is necessary. (Practice, in this case, is a form of memorization.)
20.
by unanswered 5y ago
> The people you are competing with study leet code for 3 months You can keep competing with the B and C players if you want but don't give that advice to others.
21.
by unanswered 5y ago
> we're not banning these books or anything like that she says as she literally bans books from being checked out, indefinitely.
22.
by unanswered 5y ago
That was the prosecutor.
23.
by unanswered 5y ago
You're right that you can't inject into orbit with this. But unlike a balloon it seems to me that this does allow you to cheat the rocket equation, because you exit the atmosphere with not insignificant velocity in a somewhat us
24.
by unanswered 5y ago
False and misleading headline. The judge explicitly stated on the live stream that he did not "buy" either side's arguments that zooming was or was not a manipulation. He stated that an objection was lodged and that he ne
25.
by unanswered 5y ago
Because mostly the answers don't matter and the only thing that does matter is the fact finder's opinion of the parties.
26.
by unanswered 5y ago
> From an "unknown risk" perspective, you'd also have to consider that COVID itself could have yet-unknown long-term risks. That would not factor into a correct analysis: the unknown risks of covid are the same whether or
27.
by unanswered 5y ago
Spoiler alert: the mechanism of action of pfizermectin is the same as ivermectin, even though they're different drugs. How did Pfizer think of using this non-obvious mechanism of action?
28.
by unanswered 5y ago
For an individual, the antiviral is better because it means they don't need to take the vaccine with any possible risks, however small, up front. Yes once an individual become symptomatic with covid-19, they're forced to be expose
29.
by unanswered 5y ago
We just need a few more booster shots! And the anti-vaxxers need to get vaccinated!
30.
by unanswered 5y ago
> Side effects from vaccines almost always occur within a few weeks of getting them, if they occur at all. According to what? Studies where control groups were eliminated after a few weeks?

More ›