tw04

21 ms·

451.
by tw04 1y ago
The big 3 are not the ones asking for this. It actively hurts them. They aren’t delusional, they NEED government support to compete globally against Chinese EVs. Every big 3 CEO to a T has made it clear they know it’s if, not when ICE s
452.
by tw04 1y ago
And what is the non-verbal input method for these glasses that isn’t painful to use? Because it’s not going to ever be socially acceptable to just start talking to your glasses vs silently typing on a phone in most public places/situat
453.
by tw04 1y ago
> successfully landed its 6.3-metre (20.6-foot) experimental reusable launch vehicle From another article.
454.
by tw04 1y ago
You use them in conjunction with each other. For instance, if one of you travels for work, you can try to plan around when you think the next cycle will be. A strip confirming you’re ovulating is pretty useless by itself if your partner is
455.
by tw04 1y ago
> In the age of X ditching Twitter and Tweets, I think brand continuity and identity is underrated. Trying to ditch twitter and tweets. I’ve yet to hear any normal person call it X yet. Which kind of proves your point.
456.
by tw04 1y ago
Cisco and Oracle didn’t start out as non-profits claiming to be focused on the betterment of mankind. This is no different than Google dropping the do no evil and getting roasted for it. Also, you’re suggesting because a company got away wi
457.
by tw04 1y ago
Their governments fund the upgrades instead of running around claiming their flight agencies are full of corruption and inefficiency with no basis in reality. https://www.navcanada.ca/en/news/news-releases/nav
458.
by tw04 1y ago
> instead of "let's see if they can drive from point A to point B first". We are now at the point where they can do that, somewhat reliably, No, we really aren’t. Let me know when any of those systems can get me from Soui
459.
by tw04 1y ago
Correct, because that combined with about $30k in sensors is the only true safe way to do it today.
460.
by tw04 1y ago
>Indeed. My point is: so why focus on regulation that targets <0.1% of traffic fatalities? A: Citation? Just because it's less than 0.3% of cars on the road doesn't mean it's less than 0.1% of fatalaties. And citation
461.
by tw04 1y ago
Tesla has roughly 0.3% VIO TOTAL in the US (taking global statistics into account it's barely measurable), and a fraction of that fraction are actually using FSD on a regular basis - so I would sure hope they kill "a lot fewer peo
462.
by tw04 1y ago
>I honestly did not get the hype until this specific HW4/v12 combination which didn't exist until last summer or so. It's the first time FSD felt like a safety feature for just $99 a month. That's exactly the problem.
463.
by tw04 1y ago
> If you accept this as true then you have to accept the United States Secret Service was criminally incompetent in failing to stop a single "lone nut." Stopping ‘a single “lone nut”’ is by far the hardest thing to do. They are
464.
by tw04 1y ago
I guess citation? Provide a list of countries that don’t have any control over their own currency? Because unless they don’t control their own currency, it’s impossible to not have capital controls in place. That’s a basic function of ever
465.
by tw04 1y ago
You’ve literally just described getting around capital controls.
466.
by tw04 1y ago
So you haven’t dealt with ransomware gangs yet? Because they have gotten sophisticated enough to nuke source code repos and backups and replicated copies. It’s part of the reason tape is literally never going to die for organizations with
467.
by tw04 1y ago
But also it potentially means mass unemployment and we have literally no plan in place if that happens beyond complete societal collapse. Even if you think all the naysayers are “luddites”, do you really think it’s a great idea to have no b
468.
by tw04 1y ago
I have 0 issues with the US sanctioning criminal organizations that are defrauding Americans. It’s not a slippery slope, it’s common sense which is why literally nobody is trying to defend the perpetrator in a court of law.
469.
by tw04 1y ago
Can you cite where in the US code of law a foreign criminal is afforded due process in a sanction action?
470.
by tw04 1y ago
Sure, but was it being used to send secure military messages in the past? Or was it being used as a slightly more secure text messaging replacement by agencies that weren’t subject to the same security requirements as the Secretary of Defen
471.
by tw04 1y ago
So China and Russia attack the space-x launchpads prior to starting whatever conflict. The concept is great, I don’t see it surviving that first “punch to the mouth”.
472.
by tw04 1y ago
Why is that unfortunate? Encrypting backups is just a good best practice in general.
473.
by tw04 1y ago
Tough to say. It was difficult to have children in the middle of WW2 when all the men of appropriate age were fighting on the frontlines. The results would also likely be skewed by Germany quasi-forcing people to have children in support of
474.
by tw04 1y ago
This is the thing that bummed me out the most about Microsoft exiting the phone market. I know Windows isn’t super popular around here, but the idea of carrying one device that I can just dock to work on always intrigued me. There’s just no
475.
by tw04 1y ago
It’s a separate environment with STRICTER security requirements. That’s the point….
476.
by tw04 1y ago
That’s just easily and provably not true. FedRamp is absolutely not “mostly dog and pony”. See: Okta being compromised, and their FedRamp High environment remaining secure: https://www.meritalk.com/articles/okta-hack-di
477.
by tw04 1y ago
If there’s one thing I don’t really want to see “accelerated” it’s the pace at which our state secrets add new, unvetted technology. “Move fast and break things” is absolutely insane for the things that let us all sleep soundly at night…
478.
by tw04 1y ago
There's just no way a guy with that much money sells out of the controlling stake in his own company without knowing it was going to happen. The billoin dollar question is why? Seems it could only be a handful of things: Major health
479.
by tw04 1y ago
Let me guess, Axie Infinity? It is indeed MLM at its worst, because in this case you don't even walk away with any useless (but at least tangible) goods.
480.
by tw04 1y ago
That’s always been the case with Tesla. I still have no idea how the yoke with no progressive steering and a tiny button for a horn ever passed any sanity check. Not to mention the NHTSA.

More ›