4 ms·
>Indeed. My point is: so why focus on regulation that targets <0.1% of traffic fatalities? A: Citation? Just because it's less than 0.3% of cars on the road d
by tw04 1y ago
>Indeed. My point is: so why focus on regulation that targets <0.1% of traffic fatalities?
A: Citation? Just because it's less than 0.3% of cars on the road doesn't mean it's less than 0.1% of fatalaties. And citation that doesn't let Tesla pass off any FSD crash as "driver error" which they have a horrible habit of doing. If FSD disengages at impact, they call that driver error, which is absolute bullshit.
And because Tesla is taking 0 accountability for it, they are passing it onto the driver. They want to have their cake and eat it too. If you or I are driving distractedly and kill someone, we face serious criminal and financial repercussions.
If FSD decides to swerve out of the lane and into oncoming taffic, Tesla wants to shrug and say "I guess the driver should have been better". That's trash, and should be banned from our roads summarily.