5 ms·
Sure, but was it being used to send secure military messages in the past? Or was it being used as a slightly more secure text messaging replacement by agencies
by tw04 1y ago
Sure, but was it being used to send secure military messages in the past? Or was it being used as a slightly more secure text messaging replacement by agencies that weren’t subject to the same security requirements as the Secretary of Defense?
- timewizard 1y ago> but was it being used to send secure military messages in the past? We have no information on that one way or the other. > a slightly more secure text messaging replacement Yea but it wasn't secure at all. For any purpose. > that weren’t subject to the same security requirements as the Secretary of Defense? Regardless of who is using it and for what purpose I'd like the server to actually be secure. This isn't a left vs. right issue. This is an overall government incompetence issue.
- mikem170 1y agoIt is my understanding that the normal procedures mandate that government supplied locked down devices be used for classified communications, not personal phones running Israeli cloud-connected messaging apps. This is comparable to everyone using Hillary's email server for classified messaging, except also controlled in a foreign country, and oops very insecure. Even office drones working at a bank aren't allowed to do such things. This is not normal.