syshum

65 ms·

601.
by syshum 5y ago
I disagree, it is not matter of running out of idea's it is that YouTube does not desire to be YouTube anymore. They want to be CorpTube. Allowing just anyone to upload videos is $$$$ and the vast majority of content I assume likely
602.
by syshum 5y ago
>>and handle them well enough. I would argue they DO NOT handle them well enough at all, and I have a feeling that if the person on trial had a different political affiliation you would also be claiming they do not. Courts routinely g
603.
by syshum 5y ago
IMO the Rittenhouse claim is not paranoia at all, Other analysis of that same video has definitely proved that what the prosecution is claiming is taking place is not taking place at all,
604.
by syshum 5y ago
>>Those 10 families don’t pay nearly enough in taxes to cover the cost of infrastructure maintenance. I dont think you can objectively say that is true given that road maintenance is one of the least costly things a government does, a
605.
by syshum 5y ago
To me a Digital ID Program in itself is horrendously concerning...
606.
by syshum 5y ago
" land, trees, and nice quality living." are mutually exclusive, High-Density housing is terrible and I NEVER want to live in a highly dense urban settings. My home in the suburbs with 1/2 acre lots is FAR FAR FAR too dense
607.
by syshum 5y ago
I think the bigger problem here is not "we’re acting out of caution as the science" but more that politicians are incapable of saying "we are NOT going to act because the science is unclear" They must be seen as ALWAYS
608.
by syshum 5y ago
Some of this is because instead of presenting data, we are now presenting personalities. When people in media, or politicians say "Trust the science" they do not point to a piece of data, or research, they instead point to a per
609.
by syshum 5y ago
Objectivity seems to be the biggest causality of COVID... The vast majority of people have "picked a side" and will use any data they deem to be advantage to their side to highlight how they were right, and ignore any data that di
610.
by syshum 5y ago
Venture Capital is where good idea's go to die.... Substack is a good idea, but venture capital will ensure they devolve into another Twitter, Facebook, etc... which is not good....
611.
by syshum 5y ago
>>Because people are cheap and they don't like spending money and as soon as coal and oil are expensive they'll stop using it just like when you tell them they're fired if they don't get vaccinated most of them get
612.
by syshum 5y ago
Do we really know this? For decades various government agencies shielded many companies from liability, and continued to make public statements that leaded gas was "safe". in the 70s' public pressure, and outcry became large
613.
by syshum 5y ago
>>Second, in your example of coal being made obsolete by market forces: governments are already skewing these forces with massive subsidies for fossil fuels. We need governments to stop doing that. 100% agree, my entire post is about
614.
by syshum 5y ago
None of these agreements are worth the paper they are printed on The only realistic solution from global warming will not come from government action, or attempting to force nations into economic untenable positions that have the effect of
615.
by syshum 5y ago
When the internet was first rolled out to the masses everyone took a basic thing and put "on the internet" after it to make the dotCom bubble Seems history it repeating itself with "Artificial intelligence" with all thin
616.
by syshum 5y ago
My truck is worth more today then when I bought it 4 years ago... Crazy that automobiles are now an appreciating asset...
617.
by syshum 5y ago
I still prefer phpbb and vbulletin to slack and discord...
618.
by syshum 5y ago
>>hat goes beyond the desktop of the 80ies and 90ies. Which seems for both gnome, and now windows even means "Lets look at what Apple is doing and copy them" I hate Mac OS, I do not want to use a Mac, if I did I would buy a
619.
by syshum 5y ago
thanks for proving the point of "why dont you just contribute to gnome instead of creating a new DE"... I am glad you think gnome vision is cool and good. I do not not. vanilla gnome3 was really terrible IMO and basically unusabl
620.
by syshum 5y ago
Ok, I am not sure why you needed state the obvious. To be clear here the comment I replied to, that you then replied to was about "why do we need another DE, just contribute to gnome" I explained why, your attempt at "refut
621.
by syshum 5y ago
As long as your philosophy of what a desktop is matches exactly to what the core devs view gnome is, then I am sure your fine. But there are a reason by DE's like this new one, unity before it, and others that are either off shoots o
622.
by syshum 5y ago
>>If you want gnome to be better, then contribute to it. Really? because gnome is one of the most hostile communities to contributors there is. So not you can not just "contribute" to it. gnome devs are very very very opin
623.
by syshum 5y ago
Their interests are best served by becoming educated productive members of society. This feel good, utopia, idea that children have no need to be concerned with learning a skill set, or learning how to be productive members of society (whic
624.
by syshum 5y ago
Schools should never be autonomous, but I dont believe they should be considered to work for parents either Schools should work to produce well rounded educated productive citizens for the community. That includes the parents, but also inc
625.
by syshum 5y ago
This has all the hallmarks of liability shift as well. Akin to the "superfund" sites. While I dont think this will be that extreme I can see more than a few of these companies that just house this kind of thing quietly going bank
626.
by syshum 5y ago
>>Okay, but presumably a smart government would decide that all jobs involved in the production and transportation of foodstuffs are essential. I know my country's government did. That is the folly of this way of thinking, all j
627.
by syshum 5y ago
Sounds like a doge to me. An easy out so you do not have have a real conversation and acknowledge the failings of your stance.
628.
by syshum 5y ago
Do you believe that food is just magically produced and just appears in the store shelves? Lockdowns impact the entire system, and proclaiming some jobs as "essential" and other as "non-essential" is the highest form of
629.
by syshum 5y ago
Maybe if you would read beyond the first line of the response we could, but each to their own.
630.
by syshum 5y ago
>>$10k for a cadaver, but this lady seemingly got nothing. That is (should be) the crime here! if that offends you, wait until you research how much money the Red Cross gets from all that donated blood.... This kind of thing is commo

More ›