sitkack

39 ms·

841.
by sitkack 2y ago
Profile Guided Optimization without Profiles: A Machine Learning Approach https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Profile-Guided-Optimiz...
842.
by sitkack 2y ago
https://bibliography.selflanguage.org/pics.html for those following along
843.
by sitkack 2y ago
The answer is always more feedback. I am excited about DNN powered static profilers. The training data will come from the JIT saving the results of their experiments.
844.
by sitkack 2y ago
Binary Translation could be seen as a generalized JIT for native code. Dynamo: A Transparent Dynamic Optimization System https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/358438.349303 > We describe the design and implem
845.
by sitkack 2y ago
Beware, fellow plutocrats, the pitchforks are coming | Nick Hanauer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2gO4DKVpa8
846.
by sitkack 2y ago
Thank you! I just went and adjusted a bunch of these, "reduced transparency" really reduced the visual load, I didn't realize how many windows were bleeding through for no reason.
847.
by sitkack 2y ago
Having never used the authoring tool, can you point me towards something to model it after? I think a Bret Victor, "Inventing on Principal" style editor would be perfect, combined with some sort of scratch like Python IDE where ea
848.
by sitkack 2y ago
Your comment is the only in the entire discussion that mentions "schema". Having an "other" in a schema is a way to ensure you can run n and n+1 versions at the same time. It is Data Model design, of which API design a s
849.
by sitkack 2y ago
It is ultimately a market effect, the technical specifics are not really important and are even conflated by industry insiders. See my sibling comment.
850.
by sitkack 2y ago
Moore's law ends when the whole universe is a computer (which it already is). https://hasler.ece.gatech.edu/Published_papers/Technology_ov... Some view it as a doubling every 18 months, or a cost per transistor (t
851.
by sitkack 2y ago
I see your Gen Z and raise you a Gen Alpha.
852.
by sitkack 2y ago
There is no deception, those numbers are what they say they are, if you click through the link you can see the source document. More people voted for a candidate other than Trump.
853.
by sitkack 2y ago
Weird, I thought this would have blown up on HN. It is the pure essence of a economic tech ladder, you start with RNA and build yourself into a crushing soulless office job.
854.
by sitkack 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_efforts_to_di...
855.
by sitkack 2y ago
The anti-administration votes are split across many candidates, this isn't a tally of Trump vs Kamala.
856.
by sitkack 2y ago
More people voted against Trump than voted for. • 77,302,580 voted for this administration (49.8%) • 77,935,722 voted against this administration (50.2%) From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43191410
857.
by sitkack 2y ago
This attitude normalizes giving up, I sure hope that isn't your intention. The constitution is stronger than a narcissistic moron, these actions are illegal.
858.
by sitkack 2y ago
It wouldn't be too difficult to make something even better than flash that emitted wasm files, that could run everywhere. It would give lots of folks a creative outlet that could be infinitely shared.
859.
by sitkack 2y ago
I love this quote > And they’ve been great collaborators; I think they once described themselves as “squares among the weirdos, and weirdos among the squares.”
860.
by sitkack 2y ago
We collectively are under attack, whether you voted for this administration doesn't make you the decider of that. We have an unconstitutional tyrant and petulant billionaire side kick running around like bulls in a china shop destroyi
861.
by sitkack 2y ago
This needs to be stopped now, no one is waiting.
862.
by sitkack 2y ago
We have that now. You saw all those billionaires at the inauguration, those people have grown into government.
863.
by sitkack 2y ago
It is a statistical measure, did I say your vote was suppressed?
864.
by sitkack 2y ago
Not just shrugged it off, took it as a personal affront and scolded Zelenskyy for it, like an illiterate coward.
865.
by sitkack 2y ago
Many people agree with this comment, for a leaf comment, it is substantial at 15.
866.
by sitkack 2y ago
Simply not true. 2 is the replenishment rate. 3, is a 1.5 increase generation to generation. Our population is out of whack with the resource load. Your model is orders of magnitudes too simplistic.
867.
by sitkack 2y ago
> The approach to layoff probationary workers has been used by Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), to fire thousands of workers in other government agencies such as USAID, and according to reports, there co
868.
by sitkack 2y ago
You said I was looking at simply. I reported the election results. The majority of the voters did not vote for this administration. > Democratic party machine as a whole are just as responsible for Harris's loss as GOP underhandedne
869.
by sitkack 2y ago
• 77,302,580 voted for this administration (49.8%) • 77,935,722 voted against this administration (50.2%) With an estimated population of 341M, there were approximately 90M people who were eligible to vote (over 18, and not prevented from v
870.
by sitkack 2y ago
Ronald Reagan is a now a Democrat.

More ›