sevg

13 ms·

151.
by sevg 2y ago
Would be interested to know the outcome later :)
152.
by sevg 2y ago
I see you can’t answer voxtech’s question, because your entire position would crumble to dust ;) I hope you’ve had a chance to reflect and learn from this. Your responses and logical reasoning here has only made you look foolish. HN seems t
153.
by sevg 2y ago
> "It's impossible for me to be wrong" that right there tells us all we need to know about you. Actually, it doesn’t, as it’s very clear you still don’t understand what I’m saying XD If I was comparing ghostty to kitty, I
154.
by sevg 2y ago
> Still waiting for you to admit you were wrong in the first place. It’s actually incredible you still don’t see. It’s impossible for my comment to be wrong, because I get to decide what I’m impressed by. Just because you wrote a termina
155.
by sevg 2y ago
> to refute yours Oh boy, you still don’t get it! The fact you saw it as something that needed refuting really says a lot more about you than anything else. It’s actually ok to let positive comments about other terminals go unrefuted and
156.
by sevg 2y ago
Oh boy, that actually explains a lot! And this whole time he was accusing me of being insincere XD Also explains why he suddenly had no time to talk further when ghostty’s author offered to have a call elsewhere in this thread. Just here
157.
by sevg 2y ago
> And I didn't feel the need to resort to personally attacking you to try to make my point. Something you should learn from. Coming from the person repeatedly calling me a shill and a liar? Don’t make me laugh! It seems you still do
158.
by sevg 2y ago
And a lot of time to post only about kitty XD
159.
by sevg 2y ago
> To wit, ghostty does not actually have a fast release velocity compared to its peers. Sigh. I’ll explain again but seems like you don’t want to listen either ;) My original comment didn’t have to spark a comparison war. If I walk past
160.
by sevg 2y ago
Personal attack? I just said it was interesting you mostly only comment about Kitty. Which is factually true. (It’s also not a criticism to be singularly passionate about something.) I’m often curious about people’s previous comments, it’s
161.
by sevg 2y ago
It’s actually possible to make a positive comment about something and for it to be sincere. These are not mutually exclusive. Though it seems if there’s a positive comment about a terminal that you don’t personally think deserves it, the co
162.
by sevg 2y ago
Implying I’m a liar is a silly cheap shot. I’ve made zero HN comments about Firefox, Thunderbird and Blender. But I must be lying when I say I use those every day. You seem to have interpreted my original comment as a declaration of ghostty
163.
by sevg 2y ago
What a strange reply. Kitty has been my terminal for years. I haven’t even used ghostty. I’m not shilling anything. Good grief. Try looking in a mirror. I was making a good faith comment just adding something positive. No need to turn it in
164.
by sevg 2y ago
It’s interesting how singularly passionate you are about Kitty, with almost all of your comments for the last year (or longer) being about Kitty. Don’t you have something more interesting to do with your time than to find opportunities to s
165.
by sevg 2y ago
I’m impressed with how many bugs (security and otherwise) have been fixed and new features included [0] in the 1.0.1 release, considering the first public release (1.0) was only 5 days ago. [0]: https://ghostty.org/docs&#x2F
166.
by sevg 2y ago
Out of curiosity, what was horrible and unfair about it? (Genuine question, I don’t know anything about how it was done.)
167.
by sevg 2y ago
I think perhaps you need to take a break from your screen :) You complained that I'm presenting my opinions as facts, and then you proceed to do exactly the same with your opinions ;) We're just having a discussion! Chill :) OK, I
168.
by sevg 2y ago
What a strange reply. You're getting downvoted because winning the WCC 10 times in a row means by any reasonable definition that Magnus has indeed "effectively mastered classical chess". If for argument's sake we enterta
169.
by sevg 2y ago
There are a number of ways you could handle this, but none of them make wireguard seem user friendly for this use case. If you're using WireGuard for point to point or to access a specific subnet, this isn't an issue. But a common
170.
by sevg 2y ago
I've always been slightly puzzled about why there isn't an easy built-in way to tunnel all traffic (ie, AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0) EXCEPT for some specific IPs. You end up having to programmatically generate a massive
171.
by sevg 2y ago
No, the versioning scheme is that the first two numbers are the major version. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_version_history : > Each major version – identified by the first two numbers of a releas
172.
by sevg 2y ago
Wouldn't that be US Nov 13th?
173.
by sevg 2y ago
What a strange comment. Are you trolling? Yes, projects can use their own version scheme. The Linux kernel has been using this version scheme for over a decade. If you think it's inconsistent then that's a you problem.
174.
by sevg 2y ago
I suppose if you want to raise a family AND have a huge dedicated lan party area, then maybe 130 sqm isn't enough. But I do agree with you. We live in a 4 bedroom detached house approx 120 sqm and this is plenty of space for a family.
175.
by sevg 2y ago
HN death hug in effect. https://archive.is/pYG8C
176.
by sevg 2y ago
Don't use this. It's missing a basic building block: authentication. Unfortunately, the author hasn't spent long enough researching cryptography. (Even the briefest of research would have made this mistake obvious.)
177.
by sevg 2y ago
Ubuntu itself is only supporting 20.04 for another 6 months (unless you pay).
178.
by sevg 2y ago
For anyone that doesn't know the reference, it's this classic scene from NCIS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qgehH3kEQ
179.
by sevg 2y ago
This is getting embarrassing for you. Just stop :)
180.
by sevg 2y ago
Once you've calmed down in a few days, I suggest you look back at this thread and reflect on your behavior. HN is not a forgiving place to have a public meltdown, as the Matt Mullenweg situation is evidence of. I suggest also that you

More ›