ryanlol

86 ms·

931.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Weird, I missed the part where they torture people in Canada.
932.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Will training really turn assholes into stewards of a community?
933.
by ryanlol 7y ago
> being incredibly flat Europe is full of two-wheeled vehicles that manage to solve this problem.
934.
by ryanlol 7y ago
And then they’d get sued over poor quality subtitles when the STT fails?
935.
by ryanlol 7y ago
You would’ve eventually received an automatic refund (or the product!) even if you did nothing. Amazon really isn’t trying to screw you here, they’re just being transparent about a likely delivery issue and offering you the opportunity to c
936.
by ryanlol 7y ago
So why would refunding these transactions render the credit card thief unable to use these cards? In any case, I’d guess this was traffic from a checker used by multiple people or some market site. Odds are the valid cards were immediately
937.
by ryanlol 7y ago
I wonder if this just suggests that there’s nothing interesting to know. “the _NSAKEY backdoor” would still make an excellent blackhat/defcon talk today if someone could actually demonstrate its existence and explain practical exploita
938.
by ryanlol 7y ago
I’m implying that people don’t blow up their own jets, this isn’t something that’s worth combatting. For insurance fraud you’re better off setting the aircraft on fire on the ground or ditching the aircraft in water. Odds are that you’ll e
939.
by ryanlol 7y ago
>I think this problem exists in most countries. Why is this a problem? The purported reason for checking luggage is security. Checking luggage going on to private jets does not provide a similar security benefit as it may for scheduled a
940.
by ryanlol 7y ago
So what’s the deal with Japan supposedly regularly xraying luggage going onto private jets? That’s not the norm in most of the world. Generally you xray for security, not for customs purposes. Nobody is going to bring a bomb on their own (o
941.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Although, this still fails to explain the mechanism via which such Cryptographic Service Provider would land on your computer (assuming this is still supposed to be a backdoor).
942.
by ryanlol 7y ago
> Although I’m all for a severe justice system Do you have any evidence to support that this is actually a good idea? Or is it just revenge porn you’re after?
943.
by ryanlol 7y ago
> And arrest all that were accomplice to his escape. The fuck, why? Not at all obvious that this is illegal, and even if that’s the case it’s not at all obvious that this would be sufficiently illegal to justify arrest (and presumably ex
944.
by ryanlol 7y ago
So what is _NSAKEY for then? Does anybody know?
945.
by ryanlol 7y ago
> Fraud is incredibly prevalent in the hosting space. Spammers, CC fraud, hackers, etc.. all stand to benefit from servers not obtained in their own name. All of those can get fake id scans for a couple of dollars each.
946.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Because nobody has managed to demonstrate a possible attack in the past 20 years.
947.
by ryanlol 7y ago
As far as I understand you’re the first person to claim that windows update uses this key. Do you have any evidence to back up this claim?
948.
by ryanlol 7y ago
That’s a pretty fucking terrible backdoor if it assumes that you already have local access.
949.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Do you know how this NSAKEY backdoor is supposed to work? I don’t, nor does anyone else apparently. This should not be a difficult question to answer.
950.
by ryanlol 7y ago
>Microsoft claimed the third key was only in beta builds of Windows 2000 and that its purpose was for signing Cryptographic Service Providers. So it’s not controversial that this was utterly unexploitable without pre-existing local acces
951.
by ryanlol 7y ago
This seems like a pretty easy conspiracy theory to prove with a debugger. Nobody has ever been able to do so!
952.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Who’s arguing against consequences for the organization?
953.
by ryanlol 7y ago
The idea that rich people should go to prison just because poor people are going to prison is nothing but twisted. None of those people should be going to prison, and in many sane countries they aren’t.
954.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Okay, so which Boeing executive did something as obviously bad?
955.
by ryanlol 7y ago
>nor unique to United States culture In 2020 the US is the only western country with the death penalty. I’m sure everyone is aware that most countries used to have very severe punishments, but that’s not the case today.
956.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Ah, so it’s all about some twisted sense of fairness? If things suck for some, they should suck for everyone?
957.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Is it really so hard to believe that this could be an organizational issue where no single individual is culpable enough to deserve a custodial sentence? It really feels like many commenters here are just after some weird revenge porn.
958.
by ryanlol 7y ago
> Then I'm sure you also noticed none of this makes my point* less valid But you don’t have a single example of less powerful executives going to prison in situations comparable to the one we’re discussing, right?
959.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Can you provide examples of CEOs of less powerful companies not getting away with this? Your comment seems to necessitate examples of such.
960.
by ryanlol 7y ago
Whats up with this weird obsession with putting people in prison? Is it just an American thing? Why not just put the executives against a wall while we’re at it? That’ll teach them!

More ›