ryanklee

15 ms·

121.
by ryanklee 3y ago
ChatGPT Keeper Chrome extension at least allows for search.
122.
by ryanklee 3y ago
God, I totally agree with this. Just have a running marker that shows where the context window actually is at any given moment.
123.
by ryanklee 3y ago
This doesn't even look like a failure to fully optimize on a utilitarian basis when you begin to account for the psychology damage done to persons when their expectations, desires, and happiness are sacrificed for non-proximal greater
124.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Are you referring to something other than the fact that the chat can exceed the context window length? Nothing will ever solve that issue, unless context windows become virtually infinite.
125.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Looks like it. (I haven't confirmed the API, but ChatGPT 4 both default and ADA are not accepting more tokens than usual).
126.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Nice, cheers.
127.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I noted this elsewhere, but I'll reiterate. I'm confused as to where our disagreement is, because all of that, I agree with. Did I misread your original claims? If so, my apologies for dragging us through the mud.
128.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I'm super confused at how we are disagreeing. Because I agree with all of that.
129.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I'm totally lost as to how any of that is relevant to anything I've said. The claim I am rebutting is that we can't expect to say anything about AI causality because we can't even say anything about human causality.
130.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I can't tell if you're disparaging the usage or not (truly, I can't tell), but such utterances exist because they serve a real function. Disfluency is an integral part of speech.
131.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Once again, you are raising the bar artificially high by pointing to examples where we fail to have reasonable casual accounts. But you are conveniently ignoring the mountain of reasonable accounts that we employ all day long simply to navi
132.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I think you might not be following my point. Actual AGI will be so enormously singular and distinct from anything we've ever encountered that only an idiot would look at it and say, "But hmmm, maybe this might not be it." The
133.
by ryanklee 3y ago
My point is that actual AGI will make such debates totally irrelevant.
134.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Nobody is going to be debating definitions when it's here. If there's a question, then the answer is no.
135.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I don't think we're off track at all. You made the claim that human cognition is a black box. That's not true. We have valid causal explanations for human cognition /and/ human behavior. Just because we don't h
136.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I didn't say it was fully explainable. And you don't need to settle debates about free will to offer valid causal explanations for human behaviors. Are you saying we don't know at all why anyone does anything they ever do? Th
137.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Humans have loved the same solution since we first started talking, as well
138.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Musk is a buffoon. He doesn't know anything more than he's told the whole world. He knows less.
139.
by ryanklee 3y ago
That's a bit of an exaggeration. We understand high level motivations as being highly correlated to certain outcomes. Hunger, eat. Horny, sex. Wronged, vengeance. Money, directed. You don't necessarily need to know the underlying
140.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The amount and kind of work that managers do cannot be distributed across a scrum team. It's literally impossible and attempts to do so would be abusive and would tank productivity.
141.
by ryanklee 3y ago
People don't like it because it reads more like cult-lite than a coherent worldview or philosophy, whatever the core is. Goobers like SBF show that the reading isn't totally off base.
142.
by ryanklee 3y ago
No one says it exonerates it, but why do you think you or anyone can make an informed claim that remote workers are less productive in any or all cases?
143.
by ryanklee 3y ago
What?! I'm not talking about smoking. GP made an analogy to smoking. I'm talking about remote work.
144.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Who said anything about nerfing? Citation is just additive, no?
145.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Again, unless you have data, seems like hot air. Edit: Just to address the implication head on... The claim you are making is that it's so obvious everyone but shills will admit it. But this is itself not true. It's a divisive top
146.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Yeah, sorry, but until there is good data on this that does a good job of differentiating along types, roles, and contexts, this just sounds like an opinion worth as much as the next one.
147.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Who cares about acknowledging responsibility in this instance. Isn't the point to provide useful information so as to fix the problem?
148.
by ryanklee 3y ago
That is not at all related to my question.
149.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Wow, great answer. Why bother saying something unintuitive if you don't have the will to explain it?
150.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Not really sure why this is nefarious. I'd rather be treated than die. And if I don't think the side effects are worth it, then I'm still free to die. What does this have to do with malice?

More ›