Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ryanklee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
151.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
> so others can learn The ones who need to won't.
152.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Well those are numbers, so it seems like there's more to your reasons than you're letting on.
153.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
And the next time your is down and their is up, are you suddenly going to arrive at the opposite conclusion? Without numbers, I don't see how you can make any decent conclusion at all.
154.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Without actual numbers, how does this make any sense.
155.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
How does it follow that because a cloud provider has downtime that self-hosting is a better solution?
156.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
$180k/yr isn't bad in the context of Sr SWE in medium-cost-of-living areas. But in the context of ML/AI, it's pretty rotten no matter where. Hard to get the right people if that's the top.
157.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
There's more to access than carrying out the literal steps to access something. Potentially, this is one of the fundamental reasons partial access control is effective.
158.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Something doesn't have to be mine in order for me to identify that it's in my best interest to prevent someone else from having it and then doing so.
159.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Access control doesn't guarantee the prevention of acquisition, but it's a method of regulation. In combination with other methods, it's an effective way of reshaping norms. This is true both on a level of populations but als
160.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Firearms. Biological weapons. Nuclear weapons. Chemical weapons. Certain drugs. I don't know, seems like there's a very long list of stuff we don't want freely circulating.
161.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
It really seems beyond dispute that there are certain tools so powerful that we have no choice but to tightly control access.
162.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
I don't see how calling into question either exaggerated or ambiguous claims in a neutral tone is being a jerk.
163.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
I don't see how this can possibly be true given that people are successful without log books.
164.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Because there is a whole industry around hyping PKM systems and note taking systems with pretty weak evidence to support their actual utility. Calling them essential creates the impression that those not using them are deficient. Yet, given
165.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
> essential For what? Many people do fine and much better than fine without.
166.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
I don't really see how this is relevant If we don't like how something works, we should understand the factors that shape it. If someone's internal preferences are contrary to their actions, that's worth knowing, as it s
167.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
What people think and feel in private is often not what they admit in public. For many of these individuals, there is massive incentive not to admit such things. Doesn't make it right, but we shouldn't assume the people responsibl
168.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
I can't read the article because of a paywall, but if there aren't serious qualifications to this argument, it's total garbage and it's amazing that a serious participant in AI research considers this an argument worth m
169.
▲
Objective-S Language
(objective.st)
4 points
by
ryanklee
3y ago
|
0 comments
170.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Dowbvotes could very well be because GP is putting words in the paper's mouth. And not very good words either.
171.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
You should not repeatedly present the world with a mystery and not expect to attempt to solve it,
172.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
It's not clear what assertions you are referring to.
173.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
It's the algo, not the display
174.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Not blaming you. Pointing out it's dubious to say God's not responsible for his own failures.
175.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Yeah, blame the user.
176.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Apologies, I failed to understand your point properly in my sibling reply. Yes, it's possible what you say is true (I somewhat doubt it, though; open to evidence, of course). But the point I was making in my original reply to GGP is th
177.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
People continue to use their hands.
178.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
> It's sad that this incredible ability of our brain to learn concepts from the small movement of our hands, probably sculpted by our evolution, is going to get lost in future generations. We haven't been writing that long. And
179.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Yeah, well he did a shitty job of accomplishing his goal, then.
180.
▲
by
ryanklee
3y ago
Hmmm, I dunno about that assumption. Only because the writing is very engaging and the subjects are novel. It's not a dry textbook, staid non-fiction, or a doorstop... Admittedly, I have only read specific chapters, but all were easy r
More ›