3 ms·

Again, unless you have data, seems like hot air. Edit: Just to address the implication head on... The claim you are making is that it's so obvious everyone but

Again, unless you have data, seems like hot air. Edit: Just to address the implication head on... The claim you are making is that it's so obvious everyone but shills will admit it. But this is itself not true. It's a divisive topic among every demographic who harbors an opinion on the matter. The jury is definitely still out and the story in the end is unlikely to be monolithic, but different along several dimensions.

salawat 3y ago
...On smoking? The jury is literally not still out in any way shape or form. Smoking causes cancer. that is harmful. period. The only controversy that is left is whether political power should be exercised to protect people from themselves. Which in the U.S. at least tends not to be a tenable direction. Unless you're specifically commenting on the "unless you have data" part. Which ironically, tobacco and other chemical companies usually have reams of, but keep hidden, and fight the discovery and unsealing of tooth and nail. Furthermore, no one wants to fund the side of the science that slits the goose that lays the golden egg's throat. So more correctly stated is "Everything is hot air. Data doesn't matter as long as it never sees the light of day. When it does, have more money than the other guy to control the narrative."
- ryanklee 3y ago
  What?! I'm not talking about smoking. GP made an analogy to smoking. I'm talking about remote work.