Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rglullis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
871.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Please, don't. Let's not normalize yet another corporate attempt to privatize urban mobility: https://youtube.com/watch?v=040ejWnFkj0
872.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Thank you. Flagged.
873.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
testing? I've been using it for almost 3 years already...
874.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
> so having children will hurt your career? It already does. > the only effect we will get out of that is even less people who choose to have children. this is not what we want. Combine with proper social policies that make it possibl
875.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
It looks like we are not going to see eye-to-eye on this one: > what is the alternative? force the employer to hire both? The alternative is to do exactly what the company did. Parent-to-be gets the job secured but not the career pros
876.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
> it's like a time limited contract Except it is not. You are probably very well aware that maternity leave in Germany protects the mother's job up to three years. There is never certainty about when the mother will come back
877.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
> You don't have control over your data. (...) as long as you trust Facebook You just lost any right to complain over people misusing words. > With decentralized social media, you completely let go of any control and there is nob
878.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
And then you are effectively discriminating against the employee that did not / wanted not / could not have a leave. How is that solving anything? This is the typical Protestant/German absurdity, trying to reduce every interp
879.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
The woman got back with her job title and pay intact , but because during her absence her report took over her work, the company had to decide which of the two employees would have to perform the secondary function. What do you think that
880.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
If you have a better word for "Designed in a way that attempts to protect you from Surveillance Capitalism", I am all ears. > Control requires centralization. How, exactly? What control do you have over data you handed to Faceb
881.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
"Privacy" here means "no big tech will be tracking me and trying to shove ads down users' throats", not that the published content is protected from public view.
882.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Your naivete would be cute if it wasn't so dangerous. > maximum worktime in a week is 48 hours. Ask anyone in a competitive industry, regardless of seniority, if there was ever a time in their career if they didn't work more th
883.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
It seems like you are going through the same thought process that I went through and led me to work on https://communick.com . Save yourself a world of pain and find something else to work on. The amount of people who really valu
884.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Vacations have a completely different context from weekend breaks. It's one thing to have an organization planning around a down time once in the year than a constant weekly reset of schedules, employee requests, etc.
885.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Could you imagine how that would play out in case we started applying this logic everywhere, and we completely lost the concept of "the weekend"? - "I know that this is your day off, but everyone will be requested to come to
886.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
The alternative is to have everyone being forced (ahem, "incentivized") to work all the time, and having rest days becoming a privilege only for white-collar workers.
887.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
1 yard is 91.44 cm, so a better approximation for yards to meters would be "add 10%"
888.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
"Right before left" is totally a thing in Brazil as well, and IMO quite sensible if you treat it as conflict resolution method: if you are crossing or merging onto a "faster" road you yield, if you are on the faster road
889.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
U eu lkdn7g 53 55 me 4fg2n5
890.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Yeah, thanks for going all https://xkcd.com/610 now. You want to think you are so much better than those poor village idiots, so all you can do is take advantage of them. Enjoy your TV.
891.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Fair enough. You are absolutely right. People do not "want" Lemmy or Funkwhale. They want to communicate, get in touch with friends, listen to some music, find someone to hook up with, share pictures of their kids with their famil
892.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
> my responsibility to take on Google and every other mega corporation? There is a whole world of choices and options between "standing up to fight against mega corporations" and "paying a (small) premium for a product tha
893.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
The point that you are missing is that this is not just about what you can do, but how the system as a whole is rigged. The fact that you know how the sausage is made and yet you are not actively working to dismantle it would be a stron
894.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
> I've worked for those ad companies Well, then I definitely don't trust your moral compass and this whole discussion is pointless.
895.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
> The rest of you can connect your TV to the internet and have creeps do stuff with your data, Your data is still getting collected, just not through the TV. > I really don't care what you do. What if you were told that ad compan
896.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
The manufacturer is being rewarded. You just bought a TV from them. They are making money anyway. The revenue from the data selling is just extra.
897.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
The manufacturer is not losing money on the device. Google/Amazon are paying them to get their spyware crap on the device. > You got a cheaper TV, didn't hand over any of your info... But you are still enabling Surveillance Cap
898.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Everything sucks where the hardware is a loss leader and just good enough to perform its function and the software is developed as a trojan horse for the actual revenue generating business. Soundbars, "smart" speakers, printers...
899.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
Yeah, let's keep rewarding the companies that are profiting from weaponizing consumer electronics by buying from them, instead of promoting an alternative that offers something that actually is what people want.
900.
▲
by
rglullis
2y ago
I am seriously considering creating a dropship company focused exclusively on buying and selling electronic components that are sold for parts and people can assemble them at home, Ikea-style. I would start with selling 50" and 65&qu
More ›