Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qwery
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
331.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
You seem to be arguing in bad faith, perhaps from an emotional standpoint. But you seem to be genuinely stuck on the terms 'violation' and 'violence', so: The post I replied to introduced the term 'violated'. I
332.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
I think they mean it in the sense that they shouldn't have to. Why do you think they should have to?
333.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
I'll just add that it's highly likely this person just has queries set up to find mentions of their name. It's pretty common for people who (are likely to, or hope to) appear in news or other publications to set up Google Ale
334.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Your line of questioning makes no sense. You are introducing the medium as an issue -- why? If you have would have a legal leg to stand on, ask a lawyer. Do you have a moral right? Yes, of course, you've been violated. Also, the "
335.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Pretty much. Although in my case it just reminds once every few years that I set up some queries about an apparently uniquely named project that doesn't really exist any more, and the infinite monkey theorem.
336.
▲
When was '2 weeks ago' and did it come before or after '2 weeks ago'?
73 points
by
qwery
3y ago
|
46 comments
337.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
The whole stack is undoubtedly doing a heap of clever things, they are very impressive devices. I'm not sure what "fully aware of touch precision" means exactly. I mentioned precision a few times to hint at the common misunde
338.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Your web browser is broken. Well, they all are. Browsers on small screens should be built to browse web pages on small screens. There are seemingly obvious things to do like increasing font sizes[0] and margins -- the browser decides what t
339.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
It sounds like you think there's some conflict there, but I don't think they're making any claim that developers don't need income/support/food (they pretty much state the opposite) or that open source projects
340.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
At the heart of the issue is the fact that car traffic has been disrupted. To say this is an insult to the people of Australia gives the interlopers more respect than they deserve. Do not let the terrorists win. They are without honour. P
341.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
I think that's a fair question (and shouldn't be downvoted), but you're being na:ive. A couple of points: - The term 'media' is often applied with a broader scope than "traditional news media". - There are
342.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
It was a small part of the post and I think it was explained fairly. It's part of the context, and they don't think it should be ignored. JeanHeyd doesn't have to have mentioned it (or even thought about it) for it to be cons
343.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Leaving (or excluding yourself from) something because of "personal reasons" is very different to excluding someone else because of your own discomfort, though.
344.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Yes, it (often) is, and the set of "creative" occupations given are also (often) highly analytical activities. I don't think this is surprising to the programmers, at least -- "being able to create something from nothin
345.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
PSA: When you sign up for a subscription service you're telling the company they should keep doing what they're doing. What they're doing is repeatedly taking (often small) steps to degrade your rights and give themselves mor
346.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Gentle reminder that criticism isn't something you win or lose, and: - art criticism isn't objective and is not majority-rule - it is possible and healthy to criticise media that you enjoy - negative comments about a game you like
347.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Maybe I'm missing something, but how do we know that this is actually a leaked prompt?
348.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
"A.I.-PR industrial complex" is a bizarre term, presumably coined by the author. I'm not sure what they mean by it, but seeing as "crypto" was one of its predecessors (as in the crypto-industrial complex?? The crypt
349.
▲
Young Australians never stood a chance
(theguardian.com)
4 points
by
qwery
3y ago
|
6 comments
350.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Young Australians never stood a chance. For decades the controls have been set to favour older generations
351.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
It's not that the inclusion of this one word is offensive and so the entire product is ruined. It's a matter of accessibility. The more of it (accessibility) your thing has, the more accessible the thing is. Why add something to
352.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
I find the shock / surprise / "but isn't this the same Microsoft that ..." reactions quite interesting. It happens with lots of topics, but Microsoft doing ~anything is a very reliable trigger. Yes, it's the sa
353.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Yep, that's the same company. The same Microsoft is partnering with ifixit to sell (and control the sale of) parts and tools.
354.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
It's a business strategy, not a natural (of "nature") process. Leadership and market changes prompted business changes.
355.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
That is a good example of an elitist (or snobbish) viewpoint.
356.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Don't worry about it. Nobody (potential competitors) cares. They might look up once your product is successful, but then you already have a successful product. > Are patents a good idea ? No.
357.
▲
by
qwery
3y ago
Having your mouth washed out with soap is a "traditional" punishment, usually inflicted on those that have committed a mouth-related offence like swearing (if you can believe it) or smoking. It's now mostly a figure a speech.
358.
▲
by
qwery
4y ago
> what does a trademark policy have to do with guns? In the case of this particular trademark policy, it's because they won't endorse an event that allows attendees to carry firearms. They consider the use/display of their
359.
▲
by
qwery
4y ago
You (don't) have to admit, he's got a point. AC is not exactly smart. All of the smartest chargers are DC. Don't smoke weed and blog, kids. Or do, I don't really mind.
360.
▲
by
qwery
4y ago
Not sure if this is "prove it for fun because obviously they're lying" or serious mode, so I have several answers, none of which are bad advice and all of which are not jokes. - Assume it's not, because it isn't. Th
More ›