> what does a trademark policy have to do with guns? In the case of this particular trademark policy, it's because they won't endorse an event that allows atte

> what does a trademark policy have to do with guns? In the case of this particular trademark policy, it's because they won't endorse an event that allows attendees to carry firearms. They consider the use/display of their marks in a way that suggests they endorsed an event when they did not to be an infringement of their trademark. They provide a basic set of conditions that should be met "at minimum" in order for them to endorse an event and grant the use of the marks. One of those conditions is that the event prohibits the carrying of firearms by attendees.