noxer

62 ms·

661.
by noxer 6y ago
These coins exists already since many years. See XRPL.org for the oldest "better bitcoin project". It has tested 1500 TPS and block time of a few seconds and on top of that a fully working second layer for high volume channels bet
662.
by noxer 6y ago
That shortsighted. Blockchain tech isn't only bitcoin. There are solutions to the problems bitcoins has and they are working fine since years. BTW the link includes the transaction fees on the XRPL you probably didn't see it becau
663.
by noxer 6y ago
With the current price large miner make huge profits anyway. Mining a bitcoin on average coasts way way less then its worth so obviously if the price increases the profit does too and the difficultly adjustment doesn't take that all aw
664.
by noxer 6y ago
I knew this would be posted. Such an absurdly stupid reasoning. You wanna pay for your coffee or buy car or whatever and the fee is slapped on top of the price. Who the heck would care about satishis per byte. Its % of the transacted value
665.
by noxer 6y ago
Musk said the logs show that the car wasn't even in autopilot mode. Driver maybe was trying to escape the fire and thus was not found in the driver seat. Although this is just as much speculation as assuming the autopilot was tricked s
666.
Avg. Transaction Fee of Bitcoin Surpassed the Peak from 2017(bitinfocharts.com)
43 points by noxer 6y ago|69 comments
667.
by noxer 6y ago
You are misinformed. They did use existing bugs they did wrote real patches for it and then submitted a flawed patch first and the real patch after the review was "successful". There is very little additional review needed because
668.
by noxer 6y ago
The problems with water desalination and hydrogen production is that if you dont run at a somewhat constant volume you likely aren't at the financial optimum. You can do maintenance and stuff when the energy price is high but turning e
669.
by noxer 6y ago
>Charging cars is a great application even though cars are expensive to build... Its also logistically hard to actually get the energy back into the grid from cars. Driving around with it is fine but if you cant put the energy back into
670.
by noxer 6y ago
Pathetic, it did not work at all, they told em whenever they missed a planted bug.
671.
by noxer 6y ago
They had no intent to find vulnerability in the code they intended to find/proof vulnerability in the review process, totally different things.
672.
by noxer 6y ago
Exactly, they are just seem mad and blame other for "wrong doings" instead of acknowledging that they need to improve.
673.
by noxer 6y ago
I never said they can not stop reviewing the code. They can do whatever the heck they want. I'm not gonna tell a volunteer what they can and can not do. They just as much dont need anyone's consent to ignore submits as thous who s
674.
by noxer 6y ago
Ridiculous comparison indeed. There was no pen testing going on. Submitted code does not attack or harming any running system and whoever uses is does so completely voluntary. I dont need anyone's approval for that. The license already
675.
by noxer 6y ago
I have no clue what you try to say, sorry.
676.
by noxer 6y ago
Someone does voluntary work and people think that gives them some ethical privilege to be asked before someone puts their work to the test? Sure it would be nice to ask but at the same time it renders the testing useless. They wanted to see
677.
by noxer 6y ago
>Who are the criminals you’re afraid of giving the upper hand here? I couldn't care less who that may be. No criminal should should ever have the upper hand. And its obvious that if the criminal which poses the least risk to ordinar
678.
by noxer 6y ago
> Breonna Taylor was an EMT that was murdered by police while asleep in her own bed during a no-knock raid. That's absolutely not what happened. At worst this was horrible police work at "best" it was a freak accident. The
679.
by noxer 6y ago
I definitely did not say the root of the problem is that police has a monopoly on force. I said that it is the reason why people should comply regardless of potential rights being violated. Because you have to defend your rights with legal
680.
Content at Coil: A Grand Experiment(coil.com)
1 points by noxer 6y ago|0 comments
681.
by noxer 6y ago
You brought up race not me. Also nothing I said was in any way racist. You should probably look up that word, it doesn't mean someone disagrees with you.
682.
by noxer 6y ago
You complete ignore what I wrote and post random links that make no sense in the context. My stance is you should film. My stance is you should not interfere in any way with police as a bystander unless you ask first and get permission to h
683.
by noxer 6y ago
>I expect the police to not violate my rights. Sure, we all do but if they violate your rights anyway, it does not give you the right to resist, ignore orders or even defend yourself... yes that a hard one to swallow for many people egos
684.
by noxer 6y ago
Do you know what assaulting means? An arrest inst assaulting anyone. Also its not for filming but for not following orders which is exactly what cops are paid do do. If you dont want to get arrested follow the order they give you.
685.
by noxer 6y ago
There was no situation given just a general statement that if police says "you're obstructing a police matter" that this would be a lie.
686.
by noxer 6y ago
I didn't say increase or decrease. I said "... without police making thousands of interactions" If you question the negative effect that would have on drunk driving accidents, I accept that its solely based on common sense a
687.
by noxer 6y ago
>...could have rapidly ended up with me dead. Like if you started to shoot? What exactly could have turned this around without invalidating the "For doing absolutely nothing wrong." Its kind silly statement its like "I alm
688.
by noxer 6y ago
You imply that you are more likely to get killed if you aren't white but this is the classic narrative that you where told by media. The whole George Floyd and BLM nonsense. There is absolutely no evidence that this claim is correct. T
689.
by noxer 6y ago
Thanks for you anecdotal evidence that you never got shot because you aren't a criminal, drug abuser or incapable of following orders given to you by the police.
690.
by noxer 6y ago
What an absurd comparison. This only tells me that being killed in a mass shooting is very very very unlikely which is in fact true. But being killed by police is also very very very unlikely in fact its de facto zero if you aren't a c

More ›