noxer

66 ms·

691.
by noxer 6y ago
I case you could not figure it out I expressed favor to record police interaction where legal. Form all parties (ordinary people but also cops themself should). There was absolutely no talk about bystander but for the sake of your invalid a
692.
by noxer 6y ago
Are you worried police is shooting you and your phone? The whole article make its look like any police interaction is somehow a thread to peoples live. Its absurd. Nothing wrong with recording (where legal) but if you need to stream it and
693.
by noxer 6y ago
Complete garbage. There is no risk that wasn't there before and the whole article is an ad for some nonsense AV software.
694.
The Media Lied Repeatedly About Officer Brian Sicknick's Death(greenwald.substack.com)
11 points by noxer 6y ago|1 comments
695.
by noxer 6y ago
They have to give you an option to turn it off usual a link at the bottom of the mail. However, never click on such a link from a real spam mail as that would tell them your email is read and you get more spam.
696.
by noxer 6y ago
You know exactly what I meant. 1% does not even cover inflation loses and you still took a risk. This is total nonsense and has nothing to do with the initial conversation. /thread closed
697.
by noxer 6y ago
Glad I found the one person on HN that can detect sarcasm.
698.
by noxer 6y ago
The point is that the premise is nonsense. You cant justify top down ruling by the fact that some parents aren't good parents. If you go that route you could top down rule everything because some people are not good people. The end goa
699.
by noxer 6y ago
I wish people would find a way to include any code present in a README in some kind of automated test. Nothing more frustrating than if you copy something from there but it turns out the README wasn't updated since the very first day a
700.
by noxer 6y ago
The real question is which one will replace the 3 if we remove them?
701.
by noxer 6y ago
>and it's unfair to the children to just expect them to have good parents. Also unfair because some parents are not rich. Some aren't living in the right place. Some are not highly intelligent. Some are not woke enough. Indeed
702.
by noxer 6y ago
Then you have third party so its no longer trust less and/or decentralized. Both parties need to fully trust the third party. Also the third party need to arbitrary choose in case of a dispute as it has absolutely no way to know which
703.
by noxer 6y ago
There is no such thing as risk-free renting out your accumulated money.
704.
by noxer 6y ago
>the coins that come closest are Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, and Dash. How come the XRPLedger isn't on your radar? It was build before these other coins existed with the primary goal to be a better bitcoin so it can actually have the pr
705.
by noxer 6y ago
That's a fairy tail they teach in school. You dont get money because someone else lost some. You get money because you helped stabilizing the market by predicting it right. The losers lose because they predicted it wrong. Its a net gai
706.
by noxer 6y ago
The simple/safe/reliable 10% was a fluke that should never exist. Profit and risk must be in balance. If it isn't it should attracts more and more people until the balance is reached. Making it hard for people to join to keep
707.
by noxer 6y ago
Thats completely useless. he would never escrow his BTC before getting the money. He could loose 100% while you loose nothing.
708.
by noxer 6y ago
A DEX is perfectly possible in fact many of them exits. They however don't work with fiat directly because you need a digital fiat with some properties of crypto. So you cant use you bank notes or the number on you bank account unless
709.
by noxer 6y ago
You could stream money in both direction starting with very small amount then if the other side delivers you can speed up but keep it so low that if the other would stop he could only steal a tiny amount. Here is an old tool that this this
710.
by noxer 6y ago
If they were send to you, someone does process them.
711.
by noxer 6y ago
That exactly the reason why I have a windows phone. Not that I would use it but I can show it if needed.
712.
by noxer 6y ago
You just washed part of the BTCs which is now owned by the miner.
713.
by noxer 6y ago
Would you return stolen goods to the thief? How about return it to the owner/authorities. May not be simple but certainly better than sending it back. If all else fail there are black hole addresses to forever lock the BTCs.
714.
by noxer 6y ago
Not an answer to your question but BTC does not really have wallets. Someone just signs a number of BTCs with his private key and your public key so the only way to sign it again is with your private key. This is essentially how it "mo
715.
by noxer 6y ago
In a weird twist everyone with a sense of privacy has a windows phone. /s
716.
by noxer 6y ago
>would they get 100% of its notional value? depend on the liquidity on that day also they could OTC sell so yes they can probably get the market price. However telling the market fist isnt going to help. >There’s a reason companies li
717.
by noxer 6y ago
No, I talked about the risk of becoming homeless due to striving for wealth and total failure on the way. I see this risk as extremely minimal, not because people can get out of homelessness or only experience "shot term homelessness&
718.
by noxer 6y ago
>And one is a subset of the other. Not alt all. Mark cap is a fictive value. Assets hold by a company aren't fictive and are not part of the market cap at all. Market cap is simply the price of all stocks at the current market price
719.
by noxer 6y ago
So you think you could end up homeless under a bridge even trough you would do everything you can do avoid that? I dont think so. Long time homeless people are a very niche type of persons that "gave up" for whatever reason. Usual
720.
by noxer 6y ago
The market cap is calculated from all shares. Tesla obvious does not owe them.

More ›