Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nonbel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
391.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
In my experience, high fat isnt an issue since it makes you feel full... as long as you also aren't eating a lot ( > 20-100 g/day) of carbs. The real problem is they started pairing sugar and corn syrup and grains in general wi
392.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
> "Had we picked it up early, they could have operated and put him on immunotherapy." Your story could be helpful to others. According to the doctors: 1) What is the years survived estimate of this vs doing nothing in your fa
393.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Thanks, not sure if I would read an entire book on it though. What source of data does he use?
394.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Not that I consider the "war on drugs" to be valid in any way, but I haven't seen anything involved with it that is in the same category as the genre of "news" I am talking about: https://www.urbandiction
395.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
If you think the economic system is scammy, but most people just won't listen, you will experience the exact same emotions you list. So I have to disagree.
396.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
> "So do you stand by your words?" - Yes > "Do you have a a Do Not Resuscitate order?" - No > "Would you reject emergency surgery after being shot?" - No I suspect the real problem here is with your
397.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Our understanding of the human body is very rudimentary. Basically doctors are people who memorized a bunch of questionable info and try to guess what to do. Give people in that situation access to highly concentrated chemicals and extremel
398.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
> "Drug-overdose deaths skyrocketed between 2015 and 2017, particularly for adults between ages 25 and 54. The main culprit was fentanyl and other synthetic opioids that became pervasive in illicit drug supplies in the U.S. around
399.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
It gets more insane. I've also seen that in some places they instituted a "sugar-tax" but the federal government intervened and made an exception for people paying with food stamps: https://www.chicagotribune.com&#
400.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
The 1918 flu was exceptional in that aspirin recently became a generic drug and the recommendation was to soak the patient in it. The symptoms of aspirin poisoning are similar to those of pneumonia (the main cause of death via flu). > &q
401.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
See my post here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18561136 Depending on how the data breaks down that could just be a narrative they are pushing for whatever reason. The "overdoses" include poisoning by prett
402.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
What do they mean by overdose? The WSJ did not seem to properly cite its sources here, but I am guessing it is this: >"Drug overdose deaths are identified using underlying cause-of-death codes from the Tenth Revision of ICD (ICD–10)
403.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
There was just a recent discussion here about this and every time I asked for sources and then checked that is not what was found in the primary sources. The catastrophic outlook is created by a few people and amplified by the media as clic
404.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
>"In the very near future when climate change has destroyed out planet" Maybe people are killing themselves because they are addicted to the fear porn spread by mainstream/social media regarding "climate change".
405.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Not sure why you are getting downvoted. It is certainly possible this is just an artifact of changing demographics, or even adoption of ICD-10. It could even be that birth records are becoming more reliable than in the past so people are no
406.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
I would like to see this correlated to access to "health care", which need not necessarily translate to improved health. From personal experience, I have a strong suspicion that much of this "care" is actually harming pe
407.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
It is more like 85-90% complete. In fact no one knows for sure how much is missing.
408.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Combining GWAS data with social science... sounds like a recipe for generating incorrect conclusions from noise to me. >"before the Human Genome Project had fully sequenced human DNA" The human genome is still not complete by a
409.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Why would there be any cherry picking? There are a number of people in this thread (and also many downvoters) who apparently believe very strongly about this stuff. Why can't they point me to the exact evidence that convinced them? And
410.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
People have told me similar about other topics and I learned from it. I interpreted it as a fact about how just claiming something is wrong appears to some people. The doomsday aspect definately accentuates it though.
411.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
> "6.4C is the upper end" Upper end is going to be defined arbitrarily, but either way its still less than the 7 degrees and 11-12 degrees considered in the primary source. > "Read books with real references or by actua
412.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
> "Do your own homework." Sorry, but both claims I followed to original research articles in this thread did not contain the supposed info. I gave you guys another chance to convince someone, even giving explicit instructions a
413.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Can you quote the part of the paper where you think it claims "99.9% of scientists [are] saying that we're screwed." I just looked and didn't see it.
414.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
Sorry, it is even clear which claim you are referring to at this point. Also, if you believe something so strongly why do you not have a go-to source for the information that lead to that belief? Why, exactly do I believe this is an impor
415.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
It isn't about facts or "truth" or "99.9% of scientists saying" we are screwed. That isn't how science/engineering works, its how politics works. Perhaps that is why there is difficulty communicating acros
416.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
>"The trend here is that it will not be good enough for you. You asked for sources and got them. Now you are expanding your request. What's next in your list of demands after he extracts the most relevant quotes from each?"
417.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
The first link doesnt even contain a proper link/reference to their primary source (unless I missed it). The second (at least the annotated version) does contain some good links, eg to the IPCC AR5 homepage. The AR5 is a thousand pages
418.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
I mean something like this. It seems like just one person needs to do it, then it could be boilerplate since I see similar posts all over the place: > "The great strides we're making in access to food and clean water and medica
419.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
> "All right!" It isnt exceptional to ask for a source, no need for sarcasm. > "I'm curious why you felt that such a hostile response was justified. You could have just said "I'd like to see a source for
420.
▲
by
nonbel
8y ago
>"The great strides we're making in access to food and clean water and medical care won't stop unchecked global warming from devastating human civilization. It's not just a matter of rising sea levels; if things conti
More ›