Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
neonological
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
31.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I'm sure it does, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt even though the article makes no mention of Quaternions. My point is, using Quaternions for physical devices is using a hammer on a screw. Huge mistake, but it can be done b
32.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Guys I work at a company that uses Quaternions for rotations of physical objects. PTUs we call them (Pan Tilt Units). I am telling you Quaternions have HUGE issues. These issues become much more apparent when you deal with physical objects.
33.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
No, the viewpoint I present is the psychopathic viewpoint. An impassioned analysis disregarding responsibility completely as a non-issue. Not even trying to pass it off. Responsibility is not the domain of logic and science and this is the
34.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
> I can appreciate that one can not help equally in both cases. You can help them equally that is my point. One requires you to ruin your clothes by jumping in water the other requires you spending a bit of effort locating a legit charit
35.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>I'm carefully trying NOT to slight kube-system here. There is only so much attention any one individual can apply to any given context. The situation could easily be reversed between kube-system and you in a different context. We n
36.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>That is at least what moral practice is like when viewed “from the inside.” By that I mean your moral phenomenology as an engaged participant. This perspective presents the appearance of at least a core of basic objective and universall
37.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>I did watch it. (And I have watched it once before years ago.) This is a total and deliberate lie. The video came out march 2021. There is no way you watched this years ago. You didn't watch it at all. I recommend you actually watc
38.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
There's no doubt "value engineering" occurs. Your claim is that early obsolescence is not planned but rather a side effect of value engineering. There's nothing in the universe that stops a feature that meets a design go
39.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Most people aren't even aware of planned obsolescence. There's also very little data on how much of this actually happening as no company will admit to this practice. So really no one can make a statement on whether it's comm
40.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Your logic doesn't make sense for why socketed fuses even exist. So why do cars have socketed fuses then? Do cars have unexpected loads? Not nearly as much as houses. Cars have socketed fuses same as houses because fuses are designed t
41.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>So, the end result of having a soldered fuse was exactly the same as a socketed one: it was successfully repaired. I don’t see the justification for the extra BOM item. You joking? You realize houses and cars have socketed fuses that ca
42.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
These features do matter to consumers. What consumer wouldn't want a vac that can be fixed easily by putting a new fuse in a socket? The issue is the consumer doesn't know about this possible fix. The Company Engineers this fact i
43.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
> Design is also an engineering constraint. All of these constraints are interconnected. None are wholly independent. Did I say they weren't interdependent? My response to you LITERALLY stated an interdependency. Also when does &quo
44.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
The cost is negligible, mere cents. A decision such as this is indeed done to deliberately shorten the life span.
45.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I hate this voting thing. People are quick to judge and It leaves no room for respectful disagreement and drives people away. How do I tell someone that I value his input even though I respectfully disagree? It's pretty much impossible
46.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Did you watch the video? It's not just about cheap materials. It's literal design decisions made for the express reason so that the product will fail. The iphone not having a replaceable battery is a design decision, it doesn'
47.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Consumer grade products are deliberately designed to fail. This is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5v8D-alAKE&t=833s If you're older, like really old, you can actually remember a time where products were of a
48.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Good find. My post is voted down, but this authoritative source is literally saying the same exact thing.
49.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Feels arbitrary. You don't group oil painting with mechanical engineering why group Math with Beauty? This isko organization... if they do indeed follow pierce is incredibly strange. Case in point: https://www.isko.org/
50.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Domain related applications aren't what's studied by "Computer Scientists." You will note that most people who do "domain related" applications call them selves Software developers, Software engineers, etc. etc
51.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I'm curious how did mathematics miss out on the word "science." The meaning of the word "scientist" is consistent with how it's not ascribed to a mathematician as mathematicians don't do anything related t
52.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Biology is consistent with science in the sense that there exists people called scientists in biology that do experiments utilizing the scientific method. In math everything is purely theoretical conjecture. No hypothesizes, no testing, no
53.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Did you just group Logic and aesthetics together into one thing? Beauty and ethics are subjective. Logic is not. Either way following this definition of "normative science" neither logic nor computer science nor math goes under it
54.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
But the inconsistency still exists regardless of the historical etymology. Math is not a science. A mathematician is Not a scientist. Why is computing a science?
55.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
It's technically not even a science. It's in the realm of logic and maths. After all we don't call algebra a science, why does computing all of sudden need the word? So to some it all up: computer science is neither about com
56.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Have you guys ever wondered that if the core fundamental definition of life just starts off as some molecule that self replicates. And that the resulting complexity of life is just errors that happen during replication that are naturally se
57.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>We do not go feral because from a young age we are socialized in our ethnic and religious communities, have a firm family structure with roles, duties, and authority, and we have purpose. We are socialized to feel shame if we express an
58.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
No it's not. It's not that easy. It's actually hard and annoying to evict someone. You can stay in an apartment for months in California while paying no rent.
59.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Relevant on the front page of HN: https://sfciti.org/sf-tech-exodus/
60.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Watching anime. Or Star Trek.
More ›