Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
neonological
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
61.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>Since when is the simplest possible example of the fallacy of division the same thing as “logic”? Without any additional information the assumption that entropy rules the day is "logically" reasonable. Meaning that if out migr
62.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
You need to read what I said. What I said is this. California is displaying downward trends. If the population growth is trending downward that means the growth of intelligent people should also by logic be trending downwards. This is 100 p
63.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
My bad. Apologies. It actually didn't register.
64.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
The idea that there is such a huge difference between nerds and people who aren't nerds is misconceived. Not only are people who aren't nerds capable of being analytical, but nerds themselves are highly able to be irrational and s
65.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Says who? You just made that up. A person who gains energy from social situations and from being alone fits the technical definition of both introvert and extrovert. This is the rational consequence and deduction from the English definition
66.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I feel a lot of introverts enjoy patting themselves on the back. Case in point you found a book called quiet. Is there a book on the other side of the spectrum called "loud"?
67.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I had a friend call him self a metrovert. A metrovert is someone who derives energy from socializing but also derives energy from being alone. I think I would be a metrovert. Tons and tons of these types of people exist. I'm curious as
68.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
It's more complicated then introversion or extroversion. You are describing high empathy and fear of not pleasing others. You act a certain way to cater to other people and possibly spend way too much energy on it, hence the exhaustion
69.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Yes logically there should be. The more skilled you are at something in general the less energy you expend in it. This includes socializing. Without data it can't be truly known. But such data is likely garbage as it's very hard t
70.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
My tip for you is to stop using the word preposterous. You present a correct argument here but in my other thread you used the same garbage and offensive language were utterly wrong. You completely embarrassed yourself and had to run away f
71.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Why did you guys switch to python instead of javascript?
72.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
You know what would be productive? Statistical numbers. You cannot deny the productiveness of real factual numbers. The brain drain consists of measurable negative population growth. More people moving out then people coming in, in aggregat
73.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Why don't you watch that video again with less biased eyes. The video never ever even mentioned California was in an economic downturn. It said California was going through economic turbulence and called it a bump in the road in the fi
74.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
No it is not. Why don't you read my posts again. California is currently trending downward in certain metrics related to economics but this is entirely different from being in an "economic downturn." California going into an
75.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
No. Detroit became a wasteland well within our lifetimes. Whether this happens for California soon or not soon is well outside the realm of "preposterous." Your post is not just off by a word, it is entirely off.
76.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
You can never find strong evidence for this. A nanny state is just a state that is "overprotective." How protective something is to the point of being overprotective is completely a matter of opinion. Some people think the US is o
77.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>That is a politically naive, idealistic perspective that does not align with reality. No this is you misinterpreting the context at hand. The context is "Businesses" so when I refer to regulation I refer exclusively to "B
78.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
It's not weird. It's not even a frame. It's reality. All regulation is created for the purpose of protecting people. California has more people protecting laws than Texas therefore California favors people over Texas. There&#
79.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
What I don't understand is how you think world traveler gives any credit or support for your stance. First the stronger point is made through evidence and the weaker point is made through reputation. Second of all, a "world travel
80.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
You suppose wrong. I'm kind of moderate. Seeing that I never said anything otherwise but you made a baseless supposition out of nowhere I'm guessing you're pro business in favor of total deregulation. Make no mistake. The pur
81.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
The entire purpose of business regulation is to protect the people. People choosing to give up this protection is the irony. For example. Tobacco kills people. Government looks out for the interests of the people and regulates Big Tobacco.
82.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Let me make it clear. I never said Texas is bad. The other guy who replied to me thought I was saying California was bad. I'm giving an unbiased view. Both are bad, and both are good at the same time. I'm saying the pros and cons
83.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
>California is extremely entrepreneur-friendly, and have absolutely massive amounts of business compare to Arizona or Texas. I don't know if you've been following the news lately of a bunch of companies moving OUT of California
84.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
You guys ever wonder why they don't choose California? These factories have huge environmental impacts that California is not okay with. These factories produce massive amounts of waste that cannot be recycled. This is also very likely
85.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I have one. Not only that, the switches are external to the keyboard so nothing for the debris to fall into. Still. You know how many keys the keyboard has? Come on man. I want to put the keyboard in the dishwasher and call it a day. Honest
86.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
I would pay $500 for this keyboard if I can put it in the dishwasher. Seriously that's my dream keyboard. Mechanical, high quality and washable in the dishwasher or just washable like a dish.
87.
▲
How Science is used to discredit Science. [video]
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
neonological
5y ago
|
1 comments
88.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
89.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
Yes. China could have prevented it. If this started in the US though... There's no way for containment in the Us.
90.
▲
by
neonological
5y ago
One day there's going to be a gan where the input is a random number and the output is the source code of an entire triple A game.
More ›