mrmlz

9 ms·

91.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Damn, that's horrible... This warrants a deeper investigation!
92.
by mrmlz 3y ago
1200 Micrograms would that fit the bill?
93.
by mrmlz 3y ago
I learned so many random bits of information from that book.. Just the amount of work that goes into laying underwater fiber! He wrote a article about it later (or before?) https://www.wired.com/1996/12/ffglass&#x2
94.
by mrmlz 3y ago
And the best thing is that they speak zigbee and you can ditch their hubs and use homeassistant if you want to avoid any lock-in! I've actually had two Ikea Trådfri switches break though - they are cheap enough to replace but bit bothe
95.
by mrmlz 3y ago
You are absolutely correct. It is a horrible mess. Which is why Homeassistant is a godsend - you can add the mess and present it in a sensible way. As long as you stay the fuck away from anything cloud you are pretty much golden no matter w
96.
by mrmlz 3y ago
I'm not sure this is the GREAT COMEBACK you'd hoped for.
97.
by mrmlz 3y ago
"bit harder" is a bit (haha) of an understatement.
98.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Sure time estimation in developmentprojects is hard (impossible?), but thats hard in both waterfall and agile or whatever. But the often used CER -> PDR -> CDR -> TRR etc. is damn useful.
99.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Hah yeah i guess you can interpret it like that, but i give the same leeway to agile when they skip the retros and the planning before the sprints etc. You cant blame the process if you dont even make an attempt of adhering to it :)
100.
by mrmlz 3y ago
I'm not really sure what you are arguing. Of course if its a one man job (or a couple) and the .. product or whatever isn't system/safety critical even having a PM is probably overkill and the overhead of "any" proc
101.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Yeah - I mean, when I wrote the comment I ignored all the absolute disaster-projects I've seen. But those where doomed on so many levels I don't even wanna blame waterfall or agile or the in-betweens.
102.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Honestly I've never seen a waterfall model implemented without iterations. And you can always update the top-spec at later date if needed its just more difficult.. Which it should be.
103.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Yeah, because waterfall with iterations is better than SCRUM/AGILE/WHATEVER. God intended water to run from the TOP to the BOTTOM. Don't fight gravity.
104.
by mrmlz 3y ago
I'd say its true for the majority of engineering work at least. I saw and ad for a Waffle-house manager with a salary range of 50-55k year. That's about what I earn as a engineer in Sweden (pre-tax).
105.
by mrmlz 3y ago
Nobody is assuming "extensive maintenance checklists" are _preventing_ serious malfunction. They do however reduce the risk for such events to occur to an acceptable level. The likelihood for a malfunction is never zero.
106.
by mrmlz 3y ago
I'm currently using AppDaemon for a couple of webparsing-scripts. That has worked just fine without touching it for... well over a year by now. But i have a nagging feeling that i should probably use PyScript instead.. If anyone has a
107.
by mrmlz 4y ago
Its the social democrats that has supported the Kurds and their various organizations. https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/nyheter/nyheter/2021-11-24... Swedish.
108.
by mrmlz 4y ago
Skype is still the only [citation needed] service which you can self-host afaik. Which is important to certain types of companies.
109.
by mrmlz 4y ago
And also a lot of people outside the US uses SMS.
110.
by mrmlz 4y ago
What do you mean "connected to a VPN in which case docker will proceed to not work at all". ... i have a vpn and my docker containers work just fine?
111.
by mrmlz 4y ago
If I'm arguing for anything is that the global food production is probably not sustainable. That doesn't exclude farming, fishing or high-density food-farming (salmon, shrimps etc.). I mean, the number of issues with providing a c
112.
by mrmlz 4y ago
Haha. The next time you leave for the wilderness, go to a field, go the edge of it and see if you can figure out if there was a reason they didn't expand it further out. I wouldn't dream of asking you of taking a random commenter
113.
by mrmlz 4y ago
I'm not really arguing for shoveling rainforests to raise sheep on or something.. But if we enjoy the idea of living (and not starving) food produced locally has to adapt to the local lands.. Which in many places allows for a lot of gr
114.
by mrmlz 4y ago
More than you that's for sure. About 75% of the diet of a regular Swedish cow is grass or grass-equivalents. The rest is made up of peas, beans, rapeseed and of course various grains. The grains that go to animal feed usually is not fi
115.
by mrmlz 4y ago
Maybe it is about soil composition, something you don't see in a picture? But sure, keep on looking at a picture of grass and decide that the land is suitable for other crops.
116.
by mrmlz 4y ago
What other use for the land have YOU explored? If you could grow something more valuable than grass on a piece of land you can be quite sure that most farmers would.
117.
by mrmlz 4y ago
No it is not completely wrong. It is very dependent on geography. The discussion regarding beef/cattle/meat always takes some "global-scale-scope" which is useless since the topology, soil, water etc. is something that a
118.
by mrmlz 4y ago
Eh. Most cattle in Sweden is fed with grass or grass-equivalents. I.e. stuff that humans don't want/can't eat. Now the idiotic argument that is often heard is "well, if we didn't grow grass we could grow something h
119.
by mrmlz 4y ago
All these studies always mix things up. Everyone who reduces their caloric intake below their expenditure will lose weight. Those that try to eat their daily intake in pure sugar will 1) feel like absolute garbage and lie in a comatose stat
120.
by mrmlz 4y ago
Well Harvard Medical should probably take a trip to the physics department and do some book learning.. But I´ll give her the benefit of a doubt that the quote is pulled from a larger reasoning.

More ›