5 ms·
Eh. Most cattle in Sweden is fed with grass or grass-equivalents. I.e. stuff that humans don't want/can't eat. Now the idiotic argument that is often heard is
by mrmlz 4y ago
Eh. Most cattle in Sweden is fed with grass or grass-equivalents. I.e. stuff that humans don't want/can't eat.
Now the idiotic argument that is often heard is "well, if we didn't grow grass we could grow something humans want, like.. soybeans". And the answer is no, we couldn't because the land isn't suitable for growing those high-value crops. If it was the case the farmers would be all over it.
https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2021-02-03-jordbruksmarkens-anvandning-2020.-slutlig-statistik#h-Jordbruksmarkensfordelning20002020 https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverke...
Horrible link, but it shows that close to 45%(?) is used for "vall/grönfoder" and "betesmark" i.e. grass, grass-equivalents and gracing pastures.
- wavesquid 4y ago> An economist walks by a twenty dollar bill on the sidewalk but decides not to pick it up, because if it were really there someone would have picked it up already I think many farmers do what has worked for the last X decades; often copying what their forebears do with small adjustments.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoYou are not a farmer and have a typical ignorant view of what it takes in knowledge and management to farm. You can't copy/paste in farming to get ahead, or be really likeable but have no actual output or contribution.
- bryanrasmussen 4y agothat's a joke based on a particular economic theory, by humor the flaws in the theory are indicated, I'm pretty sure every economist walking by 20 bucks on the sidewalk will pick it up. I don't think farmers have any particular theory that land growing grass cannot grow anything else or their parents would already have done that. So the analogy is really stretched thin.
- Scarblac 4y agoIt could be rewilded, instead of being used by humans directly. Biodiversity badly needs that.
- bjoli 4y agoAbout 15% is slåtter and grazeland. Slåtter might include some grazing, but the vast majority of things growing there won't be eaten. I think it is pretty safe to say that the vast majority of the grass feed land is suitable for human crops since "vall" is most often used in rotational crop systems. We CAN grow such crops in Sweden, at least in the southern parts. I lived next to a quinoa field with comparatively high yields. And we have been growing white beans for years. Pre pandemic there were trials with soybeans on Öland and in Skåne with promising results.
- jogjayr 4y ago> Now the idiotic argument that is often heard is "well, if we didn't grow grass we could grow something humans want, like.. soybeans". Or we could let the wild take over that land.