lostjohnny

11 ms·

31.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> But he defended someone who associated with Epstein and who had sex with an underage girl, he got from Epstein. He did not. I think it's time to cut with the BS! - according to the sources Minsky never had sex with the girl, if yo
32.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> by using inaccurate, disparaging, and dismissive language to attack the character of a critic. > Your comment reminds me of the people who come out in defense of the Catholic Church whenever someone claims they were sexually abused
33.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> I don't believe every highly-esteemed man is asking undergrads out Seriously? Epstein was really well-esteemed. Weinstein was very well-esteemed Polansky was very well-esteemed Ethan Zuckerman (MIT) was very well-esteemed Stallma
34.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> me of the women who accused Assange There's a huge difference though. Assange after he was accused of rape escaped from the process and started rambling about a “radical feminist conspiracy” Stallman is not accused of anything
35.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Yes, he did. There are other articles mentioned here that prove it. Let's see them then. I'm sure there are real testimonies of real people.
36.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Of course he did (and does). It's well known. Here's HN from 11 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20979343 And I've personally spoken with 4 of them that say the exact opposite. Drop some na
37.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Yes, but was the sign there before, or not? The story is well known The sign was there And together with it there was an Amnesty International sticker. So it really depends on what people want to see, more than what's really there
38.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> You might think they are extreme in their views but rulings restricting speech are very, very rare. And that has severe consequences as you see. Popper said it many years ago.
39.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> The fact Stallman doesn't understand what assault means he knows very well. He meant, and it's obvious from the emails, that the term is slippery if used to accuse someone. It would have been better something like "statu
40.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Somehow I missed this, so a person literally working on helping the government kill people was the one asking to remove RMS? Yep https://www.linkedin.com/in/selam-gano-089895ba/
41.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
Most men at MIT are not RMS and nobody create legends on them. Because nobody knows them. But if it is creepy for RMS, it is for anyone else who did it. Where is the outrage? Half their age is perfectly legit if one is 25 and the other is 5
42.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
"I'll kill your family" after they killed many other people's families is verbal violence. Believe me, my grangrandfather and my grandfather were jailed many times in the 20 years of fascist regime because they refused t
43.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
Remove them all then. Where's the outrage when we need it?
44.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Selam Jie Gano People should be outraged that a nobody working on automated vehicles for the US military (AKA drones) believes she on a higher moral ground than Stallman, that never hurt anybody. People should be outraged that said nob
45.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> You don't there is enough mud to go around? I think there is only mud, not based on any real issue with what Stallman said or did. > does not automatically follow that it was the wrong thing to do. It does. FSF main goal was fr
46.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
I've been called weak as European and you tell me I'm the one making a flame war by just stating what's obvious? You've a weird sens of humor my friend.
47.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
1) nope. yo could say whatever you wanted in Rome when the ruler was the pope, but you could not write it freely. Example: Pasquino https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasquino 2) I'm a polite Italian using ancient word
48.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Me, too. It doesn't look like that. > But I suppose, you are also not a women struggeling in a sexist nerd IT world? I'm not a woman, I'm also not a sexist nerd. And I know, having been a supporter of the free softwar
49.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> I got anxiety just typing all that. That's why people who are scared of their own opinion never accomplish anything.
50.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Telling someone you're going to kill yourself if they don't date you is clearly just trying to be friendly. In fact I have strong compassion for those calling it an aggression. their life must be miserable if they can't
51.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> people have called him creepy for asking out MIT undergraduates So every male at MIT is creepy then. > defending adults having sex with children. He was just arguing about the science available at the moment and even links the study
52.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> He didn't harass women during the two days I interacted with him, therefore he has never done so Exactly, he's innocent until proven guilty, like everybody else. You're implying that "I heard from someone that heard
53.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> It seems seems does not qualify as evidence > circles that interacted with RMS Like Thomas Lord? https://archive.is/7qepC
54.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
The real reference, which is available and downloadable from the internet to anybody who wants to read it don;t say the sex happened. never, in the hundreds of pages of depositions. Instead of talking about MIT that took money from Epstein,
55.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> He's harassed and bothered dozens of women in and outside of MIT. No, he didn't. Thomas Lord who worked with him says > One remarkable thing about the FSF at that time, when we worked out of dinky spare offices on the camp
56.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> stable opinions over large groups don't form in a week We know very well how they form: years of false propaganda. People still believes he's scared of plants.
57.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Do you have any reason to believe that RMS hadn’t been the subject of several co platings Why it always resolve to a comply or die situation? How many times people told you what to do, you didn't and in the end you were right? &gt
58.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> was a time where his style of firebrand-like vitriol against proprietary software was crucial. But that time is over [citation needed] Anyway, even if it was true, has him become disposable? > want my children to follow in my foot
59.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
I think he intended that unadulterated free speech is not necessarily the most important of the rights. I think freedom of the press and freedom of association come before that. In fact the first thing Mussolini did when he won the election
60.
by lostjohnny 7y ago
> Is it incitement of racial hatred to post a joke video of your dog performing a Nazi salute? Why did you post it? Because you know it's controversial and would create engagement. If the nazi salute wasn't controversial (and

More ›