krageon

26 ms·

391.
by krageon 3y ago
An average person would have to eat 5500 kcal per day to gain this much weight in a month. It's probably not impossible , but I would say it is very unlikely.
392.
by krageon 3y ago
Your perspective is the suffering though, unless I am missing something? The whole thing with trauma response and all the various things that come from that is that different things have different effects on different people, because their
393.
by krageon 3y ago
> I guess software engineers and technical experts cannot be trusted anymore to keep their machines safe. Were they ever? It's a big set of folks, and while some of them were and are competent an even larger subset isn't.
394.
by krageon 3y ago
But the state did take it for themselves, and now they're selling it back. That's not "made available", that's fencing.
395.
by krageon 3y ago
If the poster you responded to is right, it is in fact a lie to say it was phased out in any meaningful manner. I don't see this comment as unhelpful - if the use just didn't stop, that's that. What is there to discuss? It wa
396.
by krageon 3y ago
There's nothing paranoid described in this article. It's not paranoia when you're responding reasonably to measured and published truth.
397.
by krageon 3y ago
There is sadly not even a mention of correlation in the title, and the post heavily implies (except for a single paragraph, which is very late in the article) this correlation implies causation. Which it doesn't, and that's impora
398.
by krageon 3y ago
Yes, and the way to solve them having no info is to give them an easy start and guide them to next steps they can actually work with. In my opinion it is not useful to take a service that seeks to solve something and bury them in "you
399.
by krageon 3y ago
I'll try for some more constructive input: This is a good idea, if you properly couch it. Just as an investor must understand they can lose money when investing, they must understand this sort of input won't always be entirely acc
400.
by krageon 3y ago
> small doses (up to ~5 cups / day) one cup has ~120mg of caffeine. This is 600 mg of caffeine. That's not a small dose. I would say it's above even a "moderate" dose. To be safe I looked it up, and I find up to
401.
by krageon 3y ago
If anything, it looks to me like the researchers are saying the opposite: We understand how this works, so it cannot be magic or special. The fact that you think it is means you are just wrong. Sadly it is possible I have arrived at this co
402.
by krageon 3y ago
Leaking user data (or "anonymising" it and then selling it) doesn't alienate a corporate userbase, because corporations broadly do not care at all that user data gets leaked. Unless it materially affects their income, this is
403.
by krageon 3y ago
> Job levels are tied to the amount of business value one provides. The other replies have told you already this broadly isn't true, so I will ask this: Do you have an example of a company where what I quoted is the truth? Normally
404.
by krageon 3y ago
> if they're not sure The thing about mistakes is that you often don't expect you're making one. To my mind there is still value in having a built-in second opinion. The amount of times I've heard doctors tell female
405.
by krageon 3y ago
They really don't inspire confidence. It appears to be a single-author project, so at first I thought it may be a learning project. But it's a number of years old, so probably not (anymore). Most of the build instructions were w
406.
by krageon 3y ago
It is a fair assumption even in this case, the rebranding serves to hide the fact that private keys are used from you.
407.
by krageon 3y ago
It says it has those things, but it changes absolutely nothing for corporate use - you're still exfiltrating important information. To say nothing of sending personal information there, that is an even worse idea (because you have less
408.
by krageon 3y ago
Occam's razor is that it was meant to be comedy, because it being serious is not really credible. The rest of the responses seem to agree that if it is taken seriously, this statement is ridiculous.
409.
by krageon 3y ago
The OP speaks of tea leaf reader, which makes this a secondhand reading of tea leaves. Reading tea leaves is essentially writing fiction - is this not how the comment was meant to be read?
410.
by krageon 4y ago
This isn't very nuanced at all - my only point was that it's not as absolute as it sounds when someone says "eating off these plates destroys your gut lining", not that there was nothing to be found at all.
411.
by krageon 4y ago
I did eat there every evening that I worked there. I apologise, I was not clear.
412.
by krageon 4y ago
This is not about Disneyland, it is about a single dishwasher. I don't see how the scope is insurmountable for a single person when that is the subject.
413.
by krageon 4y ago
Yes, the USA does this and it is a travesty.
414.
by krageon 4y ago
"Race" as a concept that is useful or even worth logging is something most developed countries do not do. What is done is logging where someone is born or where their parents came from (which I suppose is closer to ethnicity, but
415.
by krageon 4y ago
> a house fire by mucking about with electricity in a device that also has water shooting around in it. If a corporation can do it properly, there is no reason to assume OP cannot. It is a little over the top to insist their house will c
416.
by krageon 4y ago
You need to rinse off what you put in if there is a lot of stuff on it, not because it will not be cleaned (it probably will) but because you don't want to have to clean that out of the machine at the end of the night. What does it mea
417.
by krageon 4y ago
I would argue that for a thing to be normal both of you would have to see it at least sometimes, unless OP lives on the moon and you live on mars.
418.
by krageon 4y ago
Most physical labour (construction, but also work in harbours etc) just doesn't work this way. Perhaps that's not a healthy work environment, but if it is the only way you can earn the money that feeds you and perhaps your family
419.
by krageon 4y ago
I agree that "the window is very short" is not a great qualifier to downgrade severity with. Maybe if it required specific setup that was somehow hard to achieve, but "doing things fast" doesn't appear to fall under
420.
by krageon 4y ago
It is entirely normal to have a test period of 1-3 months here (inside the EU, which is not homogenous and doesn't look like the UK at all) where you can be fired immediately.

More ›