krageon

3 ms·

1.
by krageon 9d ago
You've made a hypothesis, provided no basis for it, blew past that and built some more conclusions on top of it. Along the way you introduced a few more unsubstantiated thoughts. The post in it's entirety reads as a religious rant
2.
by krageon 9d ago
They might get sad because they feel like they're missing out
3.
by krageon 9d ago
This is a forgivable statement if you didn't read it, because then I guess you may not have seen that there's themes at play and a point being made. If you did read it I do not understand how you don't see how you are meant
4.
by krageon 9d ago
Is this some sort of avant-garde sarcasm that is meant to be funny? I'm genuinely asking, I am having trouble modeling a live human being that reads any amount of llm-related news and says this without it being facetious.
5.
by krageon 9d ago
If you want some input; I have to assume you are getting downvoted because you are posting a vague unsubstantiated criticism that isn't particularly interesting and while perhaps a little germane also does not invite further conversati
6.
by krageon 9d ago
Large exchanges handle this very simply: If they have the keys, it goes to the inheritor(s) once they get a court order. If they do not, it goes nowhere
7.
by krageon 9d ago
> You've used gift cards before right? The whole point is that you can't convert them to cash. This is very untrue - there's a ton of services that do this and while it is against the ToS sometimes, there's plenty of
8.
by krageon 9d ago
This is not laundering, it is in fact exactly as the service was meant to be used. As long as you save where the money comes from and where it goes you are at worst operating a discount pseudo-bank. But that's what google is also doi
9.
by krageon 9d ago
Very cool. Of course we both understand that this is the case - this is why it is in scare quotes. You are arguing about something I literally acknowledged in my original post. The issue is that it happened due to what is for all intents an
10.
by krageon 11d ago
They broke: * at "random", during regular use * when installing something, sometimes * when removing something, sometimes * slowly, over time They were essentially just huge steaming piles of shit. What you are describing was true
11.
by krageon 17d ago
Given that you know these terms you must be aware we have invented different words for organisms that have mixed effects (positive and negative) on the host organism. Parasite, commensalist and symbiote. If you don't want folks who kno
12.
by krageon 26d ago
Ah, I thought you were saying you were disappointed due to something new.
13.
by krageon 26d ago
arguably the job application process is automated and staffed by the ignorant to such a degree that it's an adversarial game where you don't need to be optimising for correctness. Which is the perfect tool to be mass spamming job
14.
by krageon 1mo ago
A toaster cannot meaningfully consent, because it is not aware. I must say I'm morbidly curious what you are disappointed about.
15.
by krageon 1mo ago
This type of thing has been generalised to "we have created the torment nexus from acclaimed book 'dont create the torment nexus'". I really do not understand what motivates engineers to rebuild things from dystopic fict
16.
by krageon 1mo ago
While in the abstract a great thought, this mindset in aggregate is why our children will end up living in hell.
17.
by krageon 2mo ago
This is a crappy report, that's what is being discussed
18.
by krageon 3mo ago
When you make an outrageous claim the burden of proof is on the claimant. Given that there isn't a real indication of anything to the contrary, it is reasonable to assume reality is still the way it always was and humans are too.
19.
by krageon 3mo ago
Calling it that makes you instantly recognisable as someone who is corporate to a problematic degree. I guess it is somewhat good to be upfront about it, but I think praise is taking it too far. The fight itself definitely would not be st
20.
by krageon 3mo ago
This is a math problem with a math solution. You verify it with math
21.
by krageon 3mo ago
I thought it was interesting to read. It had some information I didn't have before.
22.
by krageon 3mo ago
You make so many outlandish claims and outrageous statements - Oss libraries being entirely ai, you can trivially replace any Oss library with agent output, etc. It really distracts from your core question (which has a premise that doesn&#x
23.
by krageon 4mo ago
Even before the advent of AI the quality of most reports was depressingly low. Most of your reports will quite simply come from folks in lower-wage countries that broadly don't speak English well and that use a shotgun approach to bug
24.
by krageon 4mo ago
I've run a bug bounty program for a relatively large corporation and you are exactly right. It's worse in open source, because none of the developers owe a researcher their time. At least in a bug bounty program you've commun
25.
by krageon 4mo ago
The coreutils rewrite was shit because of the license change. Most of the other founding ideas were also bad as you say, but the license change was absolutely a much worse signal. Just a bunch of people rolling over and showing big corps th
26.
by krageon 4mo ago
> What do you want to tell with this? It's a common llm-ism. It makes clear this person is capable of speaking english without chatgpt and makes a case that the chatgpt voice patterns are in fact as claimed by GP evidence of a lack
27.
by krageon 4mo ago
The third party is never trustworthy. Such a system is the death of all things good in effect - it makes a single party very attractive to compromise. Compromise is so easy in practice that imagining a group of people is preventing it at an
28.
by krageon 5mo ago
It's kind of hilarious that saying "maybe he wasn't capable of reading comprehension" is supposed to be some sort of reasonable basis to have taken another unforgivable action on.
29.
by krageon 6mo ago
I think the fact that you can claim this without any apparent sarcasm means you operate in a very specific part of society most people aren't a part of.
30.
by krageon 8mo ago
While what GP said was not worded how the site rules say it should be, your original point is very tedious and can only be read charitably if we assume you never read any news or barely retain anything. We are currently on a news website. I

More ›