3 ms·
I'll try for some more constructive input: This is a good idea, if you properly couch it. Just as an investor must understand they can lose money when investing
by krageon 3y ago
I'll try for some more constructive input: This is a good idea, if you properly couch it. Just as an investor must understand they can lose money when investing, they must understand this sort of input won't always be entirely accurate (much like the evaluation by a real human wouldn't be). A well informed human being gets their information from many sources.
If you can manage to get your users to actually understand this, I think this is a very cool idea. Following a giant stream of news about your big stocks is tedious as hell and anything that can reduce that workload is a good idea.
- messe 3y ago> A well informed human being gets their information from many sources They're actively targeting uninformed, inexperienced investors though.
- krageon 3y agoYes, and the way to solve them having no info is to give them an easy start and guide them to next steps they can actually work with. In my opinion it is not useful to take a service that seeks to solve something and bury them in "you will get sued" comments. It's hateful and won't lead anywhere good.
- alexb_ 3y agoI don't care how "hateful" I'm being. Making a LLM do stock picks and then telling people who don't know any better that it's a reliable way to invest money is something that will cause someone to lose their savings. It's not just about them getting sued - it's about them causing gigantic harm to someone's actual life. Plus, if you take a look at their site, it's clear they're also involved with web3/crypto nonsense, which has stolen quite enough money from honest people already.
- messe 3y agoI’m being blunt, not hateful. Not everything needs to be wrapped in nice words and pleasantries for the sake of it. I find it hard to be constructive toward a project that I strongly feel should not exist and whose existence I believe will be actively harmful.