keneda7

7 ms·

31.
by keneda7 4y ago
>>And just to be clear, you're agreeing with somebody who claimed that SFPD is defunded and is only acting differently because they are currently defunded. I responded to you, you responded to someone claiming "The police ar
32.
by keneda7 4y ago
>>After all, why stay in a city when everything is closed when you can get the same experience cheaper somewhere else? If someone is moving due to cost that is displacement in my eyes. If there was not a cost, they would stay. You cl
33.
by keneda7 4y ago
So just be clear you are claiming there is 0 defunding but then admit by your count there is one decrease which is also known as defunding? Also based on the timeline for 21-22 they defunded, then recognized the need more money because you
34.
by keneda7 4y ago
Not the original poster but here is an article on SFs population https://sfstandard.com/research-data/san-francisco-bay-area-... From 2020-2022 SF (city) -65,522 SF Bay Area -249,389 Its also worth noting the SF (city
35.
by keneda7 4y ago
But yet again here you are arguing my point for me. The residents of SF caused this. If the current renters don't care enough to do something about it by voting in different politicians/policies are they not to blame? The popul
36.
by keneda7 4y ago
It is crazy to me how many people just straight up lie on here. The article the poster linked to does not show the overall department budget, rather that was spent on employees' wages. I don't see you or the other poster mentioni
37.
by keneda7 4y ago
I'm still a little confused by your point. Your last comment seems to support what I and the other poster was saying. The residents (home owners new or old and renters are included in residents) caused this issue. You refer to them v
38.
by keneda7 4y ago
I think you may be the one missing the dots. The comment you responded to is pointing out that cycle you list (gentrification -> disparity -> flight -> neglect) is a direct result of the residents actions. They are the ones that
39.
by keneda7 4y ago
I believe this comes down to the difference in the US vs EU. The US focus more on the probability of something being harmful whereas the EU focus more on the possibility of something being harmful. edit: to explain more. There is always a
40.
by keneda7 4y ago
I see this repeated a lot. Are you trying to be technical and say the money wasn't physically printed? If you are doing that, you are being ridiculous. But if you are not trying to be technical could you please provide some proof?
41.
by keneda7 4y ago
No you are just straight up lying now. If a person entered the country with a visa or visa waiver and overstayed their welcome then they entered the country legally. The vast majority of person enter the US without authorization are not t
42.
by keneda7 4y ago
But you mislead in your post by leaving that out? Could you please provide evidence that population growth adjusted this number to under a record high? Until then I am going to actual believe the real numbers and not how you feel.
43.
by keneda7 4y ago
As in today 2023 yes they are going down. That is because Title 42 is being used again. However according to this article last year was a record high. "In fiscal year 2022, federal officials along the southern border stopped migrants
44.
by keneda7 4y ago
If you have a valid rx is it still illegal for you to order the overseas drugs?
45.
by keneda7 4y ago
Ah that makes sense. Thank you for explaining.
46.
by keneda7 4y ago
I'm a little confused here. You say being in the US without permission is not a crime. But that means you crossed a border illegally to get here which is in fact more than a non-criminal civil case. It is stated in the first paragrap
47.
by keneda7 4y ago
I actually paid for resharper for many years. However when I switched over to VS22 I decided to give it a shot without it. As its definitely still lacking compared to resharper I have been using ChatGPT to fill in the gaps. If I get char
48.
by keneda7 4y ago
Completely agree. If they start charging for what I am using it for I would switch back to resharper. If I'm going to pay I may as well may it as convenient as possible and integrate it into VS.
49.
by keneda7 4y ago
I've been waiting for an article like this. As a software developer I completely agree with them. Often when I mention I use ChatGPT I get strange looks. Its like people automatically assume I am going to ChatGPT and saying "Bui
50.
by keneda7 4y ago
Those are pretty damning statistics to be honest. Just so I know I am understanding you correctly you believe that more that 1.5% of the cases did have merit and if those cases would have been handled outside of the whistleblower legislatio
51.
by keneda7 4y ago
You hit the nail on the head but you did not actually say it. The current system is NOT part of the legal system. We are not arguing about the legal system. We are arguing about the administrative system these administrators/profess
52.
by keneda7 4y ago
But the reverse is also true. Professors have the power to ruin a students career before it even starts. I am a product of public schools and two state colleges. I saw tons of professors that used their personal feelings of a student to d
53.
by keneda7 4y ago
I am not sure for how much longer that will remain true. Mercedes seems to be getting closer and closer. https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/27/23572942/mercedes-drive-p...
54.
by keneda7 4y ago
I addressed it in the last post. Let me try and explain it in simpler, easier to understand steps that doesn't force you to use critical thinking. SBF was breaking the law and he knew it. He wanted a get out of jail free card so he
55.
by keneda7 4y ago
I apologize if I misunderstood your original comment. I read it as you saying SBF hedged his bets by giving equally to both sides so they both are just as guilty here. In my original response I was pretty clear I was specifically saying we
56.
by keneda7 4y ago
Making illegal donations is not the same thing at all as donating equally to both sides. The indictment does not say he donated equally to both side like you are trying to imply in your post. He hedged his bets 2-1. For every dollar he ga
57.
by keneda7 4y ago
Yet we just have to take SBFs word for him donating equally the both sides. I do not find him trustworthy. I also would point out that his parents are both involved in left pacs. I'm sure he has no reason to lie. Of the donation we
58.
by keneda7 4y ago
Okay that makes a lot more sense. Based on your response, your argument is more about the way/method they are negotiating with the employer not the act of negotiating itself. My previous comment had asked this also: Is it okay for a c
59.
by keneda7 4y ago
Could you explain this a bit more please? It appears you are saying an employee negotiating for a better salary is a gross and extortion mentality? If so I have to say I 100% disagree with you. Negotiating is one of the last tools workers
60.
by keneda7 4y ago
Any explanation here? From what I can find, eggs are considered one of the super foods by most people.

More ›