Those are pretty damning statistics to be honest. Just so I know I am understanding you correctly you believe that more that 1.5% of the cases did have merit a

Those are pretty damning statistics to be honest. Just so I know I am understanding you correctly you believe that more that 1.5% of the cases did have merit and if those cases would have been handled outside of the whistleblower legislation they probably would have been more successful? Based on the statistics you provided that seems like a reasonable assumption. Do you happen to have any stats on the percentage of successful cases using more conventional proceedings. I feel like its probably a pretty hard metric to track.